|
On April 19 2012 21:22 SeeKeR wrote:Show nested quote +On April 19 2012 21:20 Hassybaby wrote:On April 19 2012 21:19 mcmartini wrote:On April 19 2012 21:17 Hassybaby wrote:On April 19 2012 21:17 Sadistx wrote:On April 19 2012 21:16 Gorlin wrote:On April 19 2012 21:14 SeeKeR wrote:
Wow people vote 5 stars way to easily. A 5 star game should be rare. That game was a two, maybe a three. It's just anti-terran bias here. Look at the 3 pages of nothing "ommmmmmgggggggggg hero". Those people are voting. I have a crazy theory People like Hero I love HerO and I was happy to give a big exclamation when he won, but I voted 2 stars. Just because someone is happy their player got through doesn't give it an auto 5 star. I agree, but its retarded to think it was 5-start because Hero beat a Terran. People just like a player, and when they do something well they think its godly Not everything is race bias guys This is what I was really afraid of when I implemented the 5 star system. Ppl should vote based on the QUALITY of the games, not by how much they enjoyed seeing their favorite player succeed
I don't know why you waste your time making variations of something that already works. Yes/No/If you have time works fine and any poll will be biased.
|
On April 19 2012 21:25 Ruscour wrote:
No-one in Australia drinks Fosters haha.
Seriously though, someone host a big tournament...everyone and their dog will go...
Cept them silly westerners
|
|
|
United Kingdom10823 Posts
You people and your drinking
*scoff*
|
On April 19 2012 21:27 BlueFlames wrote:Show nested quote +On April 19 2012 21:25 Misoza wrote:On April 19 2012 21:24 Bashion wrote:On April 19 2012 21:22 Misoza wrote:On April 19 2012 21:20 aznball123 wrote:
No, it was a great game. Just the MVP fans butt hurt, most people wouldn't even have pushed to kill the siege tank like Hero did. It was a nice attack from MVP, but a brilliant hold by Hero. Definitely, worth the 5 star. Don't be butt hurt, just watch. /facepalm. Why the facepalm? Its a matter of opinion. He thinks that game deserves a 5star. Thats it. Just because you dont agree with him, dont need to be a prick. Because his opinion is bad and he should feel bad. So will you be the judge of opinions from now on? How glad i am i dont have to think for myself anymore.
My opinion is that his opinion is wrong.
*explodes into a paradoxial cloud of dust*
|
On April 19 2012 21:27 MCDayC wrote:Show nested quote +On April 19 2012 21:27 BlueFlames wrote:On April 19 2012 21:25 Misoza wrote:On April 19 2012 21:24 Bashion wrote:On April 19 2012 21:22 Misoza wrote:On April 19 2012 21:20 aznball123 wrote:
No, it was a great game. Just the MVP fans butt hurt, most people wouldn't even have pushed to kill the siege tank like Hero did. It was a nice attack from MVP, but a brilliant hold by Hero. Definitely, worth the 5 star. Don't be butt hurt, just watch. /facepalm. Why the facepalm? Its a matter of opinion. He thinks that game deserves a 5star. Thats it. Just because you dont agree with him, dont need to be a prick. Because his opinion is bad and he should feel bad. So will you be the judge of opinions from now on? How glad i am i dont have to think for myself anymore. I believe that was a joke. I may be wrong.
I really hope so. Now back to the match of the cutest zergs in sc2.
|
On April 19 2012 21:26 Scarecrow wrote:Show nested quote +On April 19 2012 21:25 Fubi wrote:
Man, I'm kinda starting to hate allowing players to pick their maps. It usually ends up being a "bo1" for g1, into 2 random poor games with maps favouring one player. Vetoes seem like a far better way of doing it. Having 2 out of the 3 potential games being played on the most imbalanced maps in the pool is a dumb system
Yea seriously agree. I mean I understand that they're trying to make more games that goes to the "exciting" decisive 3rd game, but it isn't really accomplishing that job that much, all it's doing is giving us 2 extra bad games most of the time.
|
|
|
Happy for HerO but I keep thinking PvT is broken
|
United Kingdom10823 Posts
With the colour of this map, you shouldn't need to spread creep. it's already there
|
On April 19 2012 21:25 Ruscour wrote:
No-one in Australia drinks Fosters haha.
Seriously though, someone host a big tournament...everyone and their dog will go...
I like carlton. But I'm from tasmania so it's all cascade and boags here
|
On April 19 2012 21:28 cefiro wrote:
Airsharks o0 I want a map with Flying July!
|
On April 19 2012 21:27 FireSA wrote:
I think the effects of Hero drawing out the second game are being underestimated by people. I am pretty darn sure that it is the main reason that MVP did what he did, and why he tapped out so quickly after failing
Was thinking the same thing too, esp with MVP's exploding wrists the long game was probably very tiring.
That and he might have remembered the problems he went through trying to kill HerO even being 1 base up essentially the entire game.
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
how did they open? missed it
|
Leenock not even blinking when that ling harass comes... drones keep mining, lings shifted just enough to protect. Nice to see
|
On April 19 2012 21:27 -TesteR- wrote:Show nested quote +On April 19 2012 21:22 Talin wrote:Are people seriously complaining about poll votes? -_- I can't remember voting objectively in any starcraft-related poll ever, EVER (unless it happened to coincide with my choice).  remember, the people who are complaining about the 5 star votes are the same people who would themselves vote 5 stars if MVP had won :D
That's not true at all and a really stupid thing to say, a Terran winning with a one base all-in against a Protoss will almost never be a 5 star game unless some crazy shit happens. You guys say posters only vote with their heart for recommended games but I can give you examples in the SPL finals thread that proves this very wrong.
|
is the trashtalk over? i instantly muted when artosis asked about spacesharks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
