EPTOn March 15 2012 19:28 Fionn wrote:
Both players played...eh...uhm...yeah
Both players played...eh...uhm...yeah
I second this statement.
Still entertaining though for a PvP
[GSL] 2012 Season 2 Up/Down Matches Day 4 - Page 31
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Lann555
Netherlands5173 Posts
I second this statement. Still entertaining though for a PvP | ||
|
Jumbled
1543 Posts
| ||
|
roronoe
Canada1527 Posts
On March 15 2012 19:27 Ketch wrote: Archons need stronger team colors! Agreed, can't tell what's going on in archon fights. | ||
|
woody60707
United States1863 Posts
On March 15 2012 19:29 Fragile51 wrote: I've seen a pvp come down to an execution race where the last pylon made the difference ;o this wasnt that close tbh There always one. | ||
|
flakmonkey
Australia254 Posts
| ||
|
Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo
Germany2959 Posts
On March 15 2012 19:28 Disengaged wrote: Lol yeah, I was like "Whose Archons are whose, DAMNIT?!" Nah that would clutter the already insanely blurred stream even more. What we need is a goddamn higher resolution and bitrate for GOMs stream. | ||
|
Lysanias
Netherlands8351 Posts
On March 15 2012 19:29 GoooN wrote: Yesterday's games were 80% all-ins -> community unhappy Today 3 base PvP which rarely happens -> community still unhappy Very few like max pvp, who can blame them, don't make us sound like we are always unhappy, it was a poor game on both ends at that. | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On March 15 2012 19:28 cythaze wrote: pvp, y u not like that every game?! 2 people sitting in their bases for 15 minutes that decide to bash heads together 3 times in a row? sorry, i've seen way more entertaining pvp's then that one.. | ||
|
ForTheDream
Germany1780 Posts
| ||
|
Wintex
Norway16838 Posts
| ||
|
ftd.rain
United Kingdom539 Posts
On March 15 2012 19:22 L3g3nd_ wrote: i doubt terrans do, they arent very useful in PvT They are pretty useful in late game tech switches that only toss has the prerogative to do (no one gets scared of terran switching to pure vikings/pure rauder, even bcs, as seen by recent games, do they?), and the 2 base timing push is pretty good, I , for one, hate them quite a lot. | ||
|
MegaFonzie
Australia1084 Posts
brb going to climb a mountain | ||
|
Corrosive
Canada3741 Posts
| ||
|
Sareth
Germany1008 Posts
It was a good PvP. But this does not say much, because PvP is a shitty matchup, to coinflippy, lategame just plain boring and simply no fun to play/watch :-/ very good PvP <= mediocre ZvT in case of Fun for the Viewers. | ||
|
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
Both sides basically played obscenely passive all game so that there was next to nothing to see happen and when stuff did happen it was fairly poorly controlled on both sides. At least thats why I voted no, I wont speak for everyone else. | ||
|
gideel
1503 Posts
On March 15 2012 19:30 Jumbled wrote: I wonder whether stargate units could have had any impact there. Both players were somewhat short on AA, but at the same time there may have been too much pressure to allow a tech switch. stargate has no place in late game pvp (atm)... the initial investment is just too much/takes too long the opponent either attacks you at the right timing cuz u dont have enough units to defend deathball vs deathball or just warps in mass stalkers and blink + wipe out the VR's -> gg | ||
|
TheRhox
Canada868 Posts
| ||
|
xrapture
United States1644 Posts
On March 15 2012 19:29 GoooN wrote: Yesterday's games were 80% all-ins -> community unhappy Today 3 base PvP which rarely happens -> community still unhappy pvp is just horrible to watch-- Huk even said it himself at MLG that it's the worst matchup in the game. If the game doesn't end from build order choices within 10 minutes then it just comes down to one big battle of a moved collosi, where math plays more of a deciding factor than player skill. | ||
|
0ne
Spain2464 Posts
On March 15 2012 19:29 GoooN wrote: Yesterday's games were 80% all-ins -> community unhappy Today 3 base PvP which rarely happens -> community still unhappy Are we supposed to be happy with all ins and obnoxious mass colossus battles? | ||
|
TheRhox
Canada868 Posts
On March 15 2012 19:32 gideel wrote: stargate has no place in late game pvp (atm)... the initial investment is just too much/takes too long the opponent either attacks you at the right timing cuz u dont have enough units to defend deathball vs deathball or just warps in mass stalkers and blink + wipe out the VR's -> gg imagine the effect a mothership would have on collosus vs collosus fights though o.o ofc it's not a feasable investment but still lol. | ||
| ||
