in ZvZ a ten pool is a standard opening...
[NASTL] Semi-Finals Liquid vs FXO - Page 10
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
ComusLoM
Norway3547 Posts
in ZvZ a ten pool is a standard opening... | ||
agile_legs
Philippines348 Posts
| ||
LlamaNamedOsama
United States1900 Posts
On March 16 2012 10:55 kerpal wrote: sure, you're right that people do immediately call out all those things, but were you watching the games? that was poor play by gumiho, not lifting a cc when lings are attacking it? that's unusually bad. people would be surprised to see that from any decent player. And much of the time, many good players do make mistake, it's easier to make mistakes than to play perfectly. Look at Nestea's performance in MLG Winter vs. Demuslim, I remember him making some key errors that seemed uncharacteristic of high level play, and individual bias always make these people make excuses like the above. Sometimes a mistake is (surprise!) a mistake. | ||
ClysmiC
United States2192 Posts
| ||
figq
12519 Posts
| ||
iamperfection
United States9636 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:20 Bagration wrote: Liquid! Knock FXO out of this tournament! Not yet i want to see an ace match. | ||
Wafflelisk
Canada1061 Posts
| ||
FrOsTyy
United States125 Posts
| ||
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
Liquid sticking it to FXO here | ||
Alethios
New Zealand2765 Posts
| ||
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
Liquid up 2-0, this could be it. | ||
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
iamperfection
United States9636 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:20 FrOsTyy wrote: It is so sad to watch Liquid even stand a chance vs these Code A and S players because of latency. We need iccup back so bad. Whats sad about it? | ||
LikeAG6
Australia74 Posts
It's really not, and if you want to consider it so for argument sake, then it makes the MU very coin flippy | ||
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:20 FrOsTyy wrote: It is so sad to watch Liquid even stand a chance vs these Code A and S players because of latency. We need iccup back so bad. FXO knew that they would have latency when they signed up for this tournament. | ||
Falconblade
United States1035 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:20 FrOsTyy wrote: It is so sad to watch Liquid even stand a chance vs these Code A and S players because of latency. We need iccup back so bad. Oh quit your moaning and putting Korean players on a pedestal. Lucky and Gumiho made dumb errors throughout. | ||
Proseat
Germany5113 Posts
| ||
SCST
Mexico1609 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:20 FrOsTyy wrote: It is so sad to watch Liquid even stand a chance vs these Code A and S players because of latency. We need iccup back so bad. Mmm tears of whiners and excuse-makers taste so good! | ||
Conquest101
United States1395 Posts
On March 16 2012 11:20 FrOsTyy wrote: It is so sad to watch Liquid even stand a chance vs these Code A and S players because of latency. We need iccup back so bad. On March 16 2012 11:18 ELA wrote: Don't you realize that was lag? Oh wait, not lag, I meant the timezone difference? Sorry, try again. If HerO beats Oz and people blame lag, I'm going to *headdesk* so hard. | ||
Kznn
Brazil9072 Posts
| ||
| ||