On March 08 2012 04:32 L4hlborg wrote: I wonder when the matches were played. OGs lacking Supernova because of IEM could make a difference. Not that they can't win without him (I'd say they are a bit favored any way) but you never know.
Weeks ago.
Completely wrong. They said during the cast last night the games hadn't even been played yet and they weren't sure if they were going to play them in time to broadcast today. Looks like they got them finished
Good to know. Why did they not play these games earlier?
On March 08 2012 05:47 Seeker wrote: Does anyone know WHY IPL does this? Why do they stream games that were already played weeks in advance?
Why does it even bother you ? They'd hide the replay thingy they could tell you those games were live. Even if they were played 2 months ago it's still new content and relevant :/
On March 08 2012 04:32 L4hlborg wrote: I wonder when the matches were played. OGs lacking Supernova because of IEM could make a difference. Not that they can't win without him (I'd say they are a bit favored any way) but you never know.
Weeks ago.
Completely wrong. They said during the cast last night the games hadn't even been played yet and they weren't sure if they were going to play them in time to broadcast today. Looks like they got them finished
Good to know. Why did they not play these games earlier?
Because then people would complain about the games being old
On March 08 2012 05:47 Seeker wrote: Does anyone know WHY IPL does this? Why do they stream games that were already played weeks in advance?
As it's already been stated it's not weeks in advance, but a few days, maybe a week, beforehand. The teams involved in this tournament are from entirely different timezones across the world, playing them live would be impossible. Hence, they have to schedule the games to be played at a convenient time for both parties, then they can broadcast at a consistent time slot each day. It's really the only way a tournament like this can work
On March 08 2012 09:57 DJHelium wrote: Jjakji allkill incoming!
Pardon my ignorance but what exacty constitutes an all-kill? This has been bothering me for quite a while since it doesn't really makes sense to me. If you doesn't start for the first match, how exactly can you "all-kill" your opponent? If it's just that you don't lose a game then every deciding game would technically be an all-kill even if it's just one game. Would two wins be enough to be called as such? Three?
On March 08 2012 09:57 DJHelium wrote: Jjakji allkill incoming!
Pardon my ignorance but what exacty constitutes an all-kill? This has been bothering me for quite a while since it doesn't really makes sense to me. If you doesn't start for the first match, how exactly can you "all-kill" your opponent? If it's just that you don't lose a game then every deciding game would technically be an all-kill even if it's just one game. Would two wins be enough to be called as such? Three?
Killing the whole enemy team. If you don't start you can all-kill if the rest of your teammates all lose until you play.
wow I really don't think NSHS can take it against oGs. oGs has too many powerful Terrans and overall good players, Fin / StC / Supernova will clean them up and if Jjaki can take them out, they still have VINES who is overall very good and InCa who could snipe a Protoss...
On March 08 2012 09:57 DJHelium wrote: Jjakji allkill incoming!
Pardon my ignorance but what exacty constitutes an all-kill? This has been bothering me for quite a while since it doesn't really makes sense to me. If you doesn't start for the first match, how exactly can you "all-kill" your opponent? If it's just that you don't lose a game then every deciding game would technically be an all-kill even if it's just one game. Would two wins be enough to be called as such? Three?
Killing the whole enemy team. If you don't start you can all-kill if the rest of your teammates all lose until you play.
On March 08 2012 09:57 DJHelium wrote: Jjakji allkill incoming!
Pardon my ignorance but what exacty constitutes an all-kill? This has been bothering me for quite a while since it doesn't really makes sense to me. If you doesn't start for the first match, how exactly can you "all-kill" your opponent? If it's just that you don't lose a game then every deciding game would technically be an all-kill even if it's just one game. Would two wins be enough to be called as such? Three?
An all-kill is simply when a single player takes out the full "best of"-number of enemy players. If the first player for oGs kills two players from NSHS, and then Jjakji comes out at 0-2 and wins it 5-2, it is an all-kill because every player who partecipated in the team match from oGs has been eliminated by a single player of NSHS.
On March 08 2012 09:57 DJHelium wrote: Jjakji allkill incoming!
Pardon my ignorance but what exacty constitutes an all-kill? This has been bothering me for quite a while since it doesn't really makes sense to me. If you doesn't start for the first match, how exactly can you "all-kill" your opponent? If it's just that you don't lose a game then every deciding game would technically be an all-kill even if it's just one game. Would two wins be enough to be called as such? Three?
Killing the whole enemy team. If you don't start you can all-kill if the rest of your teammates all lose until you play.
As an addition to this, it's known as a "reverse all-kill" when you're down 4-0 and you come back and win 5-4.
On March 08 2012 09:57 DJHelium wrote: Jjakji allkill incoming!
Pardon my ignorance but what exacty constitutes an all-kill? This has been bothering me for quite a while since it doesn't really makes sense to me. If you doesn't start for the first match, how exactly can you "all-kill" your opponent? If it's just that you don't lose a game then every deciding game would technically be an all-kill even if it's just one game. Would two wins be enough to be called as such? Three?
On March 08 2012 09:57 DJHelium wrote: Jjakji allkill incoming!
Pardon my ignorance but what exacty constitutes an all-kill? This has been bothering me for quite a while since it doesn't really makes sense to me. If you doesn't start for the first match, how exactly can you "all-kill" your opponent? If it's just that you don't lose a game then every deciding game would technically be an all-kill even if it's just one game. Would two wins be enough to be called as such? Three?
An all-kill is simply when a single player takes out the full "best of"-number of enemy players. If the first player for oGs kills two players from NSHS, and then Jjakji comes out at 0-2 and wins it 5-2, it is an all-kill because every player who partecipated in the team match from oGs has been eliminated by a single player of NSHS.
Yeah, now that you mention it it's sounds pretty obvious. I would blame it on being late if I hadn't been baffled by this before lol. Maybe I'm just stupid -_-
On March 08 2012 09:57 DJHelium wrote: Jjakji allkill incoming!
Pardon my ignorance but what exacty constitutes an all-kill? This has been bothering me for quite a while since it doesn't really makes sense to me. If you doesn't start for the first match, how exactly can you "all-kill" your opponent? If it's just that you don't lose a game then every deciding game would technically be an all-kill even if it's just one game. Would two wins be enough to be called as such? Three?
An all-kill is where you defeat every player on the opposing team yourself (ie all players, hence the name). You don't necessarily have to be the first player to do that (though it does look better that way). There's also the 'reverse all-kill', where the score is 0-4 and the player all-kills the other team to make it 5-4.
OT: Go oGs! Seal is really their only good ZvT player, if Fin can clear him then Supernova/STC should have it much easier.
EPT
. Duly noted
