|
On March 18 2012 09:38 Perseverance wrote:Show nested quote +On March 18 2012 09:36 Benjamin80 wrote:On March 18 2012 09:34 Perseverance wrote:On March 18 2012 09:31 chosenkerrigan wrote:On March 18 2012 09:26 Dfgj wrote:On March 18 2012 09:25 chosenkerrigan wrote:On March 18 2012 09:23 Dfgj wrote:On March 18 2012 09:23 chosenkerrigan wrote:On March 18 2012 09:22 Doublemint wrote:On March 18 2012 09:21 chosenkerrigan wrote:
[quote]
Define Code S level. Define it. Being able to compete with most of the people playing there? Then define "being able to compete"? Now you're just being obtuse. I'm just saying we don't even have a clear definition for "Code S level", so arguing whether or not stephano is Code S level is pointless. Define 'don't even have a clear definition'. OHHH BANELINGBOMB nice job violet Clear definition for Code S: The current 32 players who play in the GSL Code S league held by GomTV in Korea. Stephano is not one of them, so Stephano is not Code S. We do not have the definition for "Code S Level". Understand? If that's the "Clear definition" of Code S, and people are saying that Stephano is "Code S level", then clearly they are stating that he plays at the "current 32 players who play in the GSL Code S league held by GomTV in Korea level". You're an idiot, you just proved you're an idiot. Stop posting now. Oh, and go viOlet!!! LoL Perseverance:D Normally I don't resort to name-calling on these forums but some people just really seem to need it to understand that they are acting like complete morons...
that's rather subjective, since to me you really haven't come off as the gentleman and scholar i'm sure you wish you were.
the definition of code s level is quite simple if you look at it from the perspective of using the term to describe player skill as i believe we are trying to: in that situation the term does not mean code s players, but players capable of competitive play on that level. hence the "level", not "code s players". this would unarguably include stephano shown by both his individual match results and actual achievements, as well as naniwa and huk.
if it is some sort of a gold star of recognition you give to 32 players every month, well, with code s invites and gsl champions dropping in and out of code s, it's hard to find the logic in limiting the term "code s level" for that as it, in a way, would ignore player skill when trying to determine who are on close to equal footing in terms of being the highest class players of this game.
|
|
|
Polt derping hard in both games imo. Risky gambles by violet, payed off though. Nice play
|
i hate infestors and broodlords 
|
Really surprised that Polt lost this.
|
Polt has this, don't worry.
|
|
|
Stay defensive when you're 50 supply up
Push at even supply once BL are up and you have no vikings
#1
|
United States23455 Posts
|
Despite the nerf, I think terran need ghosts in these situations just to EMP the infestors.
|
viOlet 2-0's Polt!
I cant believe it. I just hope he has it in him to beat stephano too, Empire only has Aristeo for zerg players to practice against and he's a 2v2 player.
|
Dominican Republic275 Posts
Its clooooooooooooooooooooooooose.
|
What a gigantic upset. Wow wellplayed Violet. I felt Polt played very bad this serie. Well Now I think Stephano gonna win this tournament but I really want a Polt/Stephano rematch
|
On March 18 2012 09:48 Noocta wrote:
Polt has this, don't worry.
Well, maybe not.
Violet handle that pretty well.
|
If Polt plays like this all tournament there's no big fat cheque for him
|
gj david kim u just made polt lose a won game
|
On March 18 2012 09:48 Bagi wrote:
BL INFESTOR PRETTY GOOD
|
LOOOOOOL
POOOOLT
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
|
|
|
ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL LMFAO
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
