|
On February 10 2012 00:07 BritWrangler wrote:
Is it just me who wants MKP to go away? I know it sounds harsh but he never seems to win ANYTHING of merit and yet people still worship the ground he walks on. Strange.
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/MarineKing#Achievements
gtfo man lol Great player with great heart, that's why people love him
|
On February 10 2012 03:09 Devise wrote:
I feel like this is the season for another protoss winner, kind of sad for zerg though, only 1 in Ro8
I'm angry because DRG vs Parting will break my heart  I wanted both to go far.
|
Soooooo happy for Genius!
|
On February 09 2012 19:54 Lorch wrote:aaaaaaaaaaaah and my two precitions to get out will meet in the loosers match Also let's talk again about how terran can't beat protoss 
|
people needs to get emp with mech, its basically similar as having MMM with no ghost.
|
On February 10 2012 03:33 ffadicted wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2012 00:07 BritWrangler wrote:
Is it just me who wants MKP to go away? I know it sounds harsh but he never seems to win ANYTHING of merit and yet people still worship the ground he walks on. Strange. http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/MarineKing#Achievementsgtfo man lol Great player with great heart, that's why people love him
I wish this BritWrangler guy would go away.
|
|
|
@Leifish
me2. i know it sounds harsh but this guy seems to know nothing whatsoever about sc
|
too bad MC got the worst opponent possible since pvp is the only matchup where he looks mortal nowadays :D
MC FOR CHAMPIONSHIP!
|
On February 10 2012 03:06 devPLEASE wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2012 23:59 double620 wrote:On February 09 2012 23:47 devPLEASE wrote:On February 09 2012 23:46 antilyon wrote:On February 09 2012 23:42 devPLEASE wrote:
Ro8:
MMA > aLive
MC > Genius (although it's Genius)
Puzzle > Gumiho (assuming puzzle can hold off his very cheesy play)
PartinG > DRG (best match IMO) Gumiho doesn't have a cheesy plat at all. Explain how he beat Mvp. He had to rely on clock banshees to win. That's pretty cheesy. If that is cheesy, then Mvp is just as cheesy as him. Mvp doesn't cheese, he does early tactical plays in order to gain an advantage for mid and late game.
Cloaked banshee opening is a viable and common build, call it a cheese or allin or whatever but it is a good build if you have the micro.
|
I really don't understand how people can like this GSL format. The Bo3 is good, but it seems absurd you get knocked down to Code A even after making Ro16.
|
On February 10 2012 04:14 SniXSniPe wrote:
I really don't understand how people can like this GSL format. The Bo3 is good, but it seems absurd you get knocked down to Code A even after making Ro16.
It's only in name, it's not like being knocked down all the way to ro48 Code A, they need to win only one bo3 to be back in Code S next season, and even if they lose that, they have a second chance in the up and downs. I think being knocked out in the ro32 group stages of Code S is the worst, because you can drop down to Code B with one more bo3.
|
|
|
On February 10 2012 00:07 BritWrangler wrote:
Is it just me who wants MKP to go away? I know it sounds harsh but he never seems to win ANYTHING of merit and yet people still worship the ground he walks on. Strange.
Similar to DRG except MKP has more history and 2nd places =P
|
On February 10 2012 03:33 ffadicted wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2012 00:07 BritWrangler wrote:
Is it just me who wants MKP to go away? I know it sounds harsh but he never seems to win ANYTHING of merit and yet people still worship the ground he walks on. Strange. http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/MarineKing#Achievementsgtfo man lol Great player with great heart, that's why people love him
This here. If you think MKP should go away because he doesn't have enough results uou have no idea what you are talking about.
|
On February 10 2012 04:18 sitromit wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2012 04:14 SniXSniPe wrote:
I really don't understand how people can like this GSL format. The Bo3 is good, but it seems absurd you get knocked down to Code A even after making Ro16. It's only in name, it's not like being knocked down all the way to ro48 Code A, they need to win only one bo3 to be back in Code S next season, and even if they lose that, they have a second chance in the up and downs. I think being knocked out in the ro32 group stages of Code S is the worst, because you can drop down to Code B with one more bo3.
Yes but this is still absurd. If they lose they have to start over from Ro48 the following season, and guess what? Winning isn't so simple considering certain Code S players who were knocked down prior are in the bracket.
For example:
Boxer vs Seed & Leenock vs July
Winner vs Winner = Code S
Or
Curious vs TheSTC/oGsFin
Or
Happy vs Maru/Maaru & Nada vs Polt/Creator
So in essence, if they had a super difficult group for their Code S and lose they have to play against other fallen Code S players, while certain Code S groups are always weaker than others (to much luck factor involved).
I'd prefer the last place finisher to get knocked down to Code A and the 3rd place finisher to go to Up-and-down.
But having Ro16 also do the same seems a bit to much, like a lame attempt to replace players as much as possible.
|
On February 10 2012 04:48 SniXSniPe wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2012 04:18 sitromit wrote:On February 10 2012 04:14 SniXSniPe wrote:
I really don't understand how people can like this GSL format. The Bo3 is good, but it seems absurd you get knocked down to Code A even after making Ro16. It's only in name, it's not like being knocked down all the way to ro48 Code A, they need to win only one bo3 to be back in Code S next season, and even if they lose that, they have a second chance in the up and downs. I think being knocked out in the ro32 group stages of Code S is the worst, because you can drop down to Code B with one more bo3. Yes but this is still absurd. If they lose they have to start over from Ro48 the following season, and guess what? Winning isn't so simple considering certain Code S players who were knocked down prior are in the bracket. For example: Boxer vs Seed & Leenock vs July Winner vs Winner = Code S Or Curious vs TheSTC/oGsFin Or Happy vs Maru/Maaru & Nada vs Polt/Creator So in essence, if they had a super difficult group for their Code S and lose they have to play against other fallen Code S players, while certain Code S groups are always weaker than others (to much luck factor involved). I'd prefer the last place finisher to get knocked down to Code A and the 3rd place finisher to go to Up-and-down. But having Ro16 also do the same seems a bit to much, like a lame attempt to replace players as much as possible.
Anyone who makes it to Ro32 or Ro24 in Code A is automatically guarnateed to at least go to up and downs. Going to Ro24 (by dropping out of Code S Ro16) is actually better than going straight to up and downs, because you have one shot of getting straight back to code S, and even if you lose you then go to up and downs.
|
Damn it, MC vs Genius, WHYYYYYY???? I love both of them
Genius played so well in both last games. Could we have a Protoss championship after almost a year? Hell yes we could, no doubt about it.
|
[QUOTE]On February 10 2012 04:48 SniXSniPe wrote:
[QUOTE]On February 10 2012 04:18 sitromit wrote:
[QUOTE]On February 10 2012 04:14 SniXSniPe wrote:
I really don't understand how people can like this GSL format. The Bo3 is good, but it seems absurd you get knocked down to Code A even after making Ro16.[/QUOTE]
I'd prefer the last place finisher to get knocked down to Code A and the 3rd place finisher to go to Up-and-down.
[/QUOTE]
Code A R24 (which is where you go if you lose code S R16) is better than Up and Down. If you win A R24, you go to code S. If you lose, you go to Up&Down.
|
MMA vs Parting or Puzzle in the final most likely tbh.
I has money on MMA b/c if MC beat Genius. I don't think MC can beat MMA tho.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
