EPTYeah, you're right!
Except you're not. There was the whole fiber optic cable breakage problem yesterday, only one or two games out of that pool were played.
[IPL] Day 4 Live Report Thread (Final Day) - Page 48
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
If you don't know how to post in a live report thread by now, be advised: don't whine about game balance and don't bash players/casters/interviewers/staff/other posters. We are monitoring this thread closely. Stop with the USA USA chant shit. Further offenses beyond page 493 will be met with bans. You've been warned. | ||
|
Alak
Sweden380 Posts
Yeah, you're right! Except you're not. There was the whole fiber optic cable breakage problem yesterday, only one or two games out of that pool were played. | ||
|
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
This match was fixed! | ||
|
aebriol
Norway2066 Posts
On October 09 2011 23:30 setzer wrote: Less information can add to the viewing experience. Imagine Blizzard added a tool that gave the statistical win% of one build against another. How would that at all be interesting for the viewer? Another example: TvZ timing attack before mutalisks pop. In BW you would have to watch the eggs, counting the seconds that mutalisks come out and not knowing exactly the second the pop therefore you wouldn't know exactly (unless you of course are an experienced player and know the timing) who will win the battle. In SC2 this feeling is completely mitigated by observers who rely so heavily on tools like the unit building counter. ... I think you should go back and watch brood:war. It's obviously what you love. I think Brood:War is the superior RTS, but the added things observer can show in Starcraft 2 adds a lot to the viewing experience. It's far, far better. And I would love to see the % chance of build vs build ... it's like seeing the % chance in poker. It adds to the viewing experience, and knowing something the players doesn't adds to the experience. It's like 'but he doesn't know that, he is ahead at the moment' ... Everything you write just seems to be 'I prefer not knowing' - to me, knowing is better. You shouldn't have to play the game at a high level to know that roaches are good vs hellion openings ... | ||
|
126Q;A1
Sweden517 Posts
| ||
|
Automata
393 Posts
| ||
|
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
Thorzain was in group 3 and they randomized them due to the lack of time to play them all. Idra forfeitted citing fatigue which put him at bottom of his group (which turned out to be a good spot) | ||
|
MrSexington
United States1768 Posts
| ||
|
Montana[TK]
1624 Posts
| ||
|
theBALLS
Singapore2935 Posts
| ||
|
Gaxton
Sweden2328 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42416 Posts
On October 09 2011 23:37 FaRess wrote: Yes he did I'm only hating about the fact that he did it not the player, he is playing very well, I just can't stand people making excuses before a game in case they lose, stop with the constant paranoia Thats not crying in my eyes. He just _stated_ that he is tired. Once again, he said in an interview yesterday that Thorzain is going to be REALLY tough opponent and it is going to be hard to win a player like Thorzain. But i guess we are different, huh? | ||
|
EdSlyB
Portugal1621 Posts
| ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
 Oh well Stephano and Huk fighting!!! | ||
|
Eufouria
United Kingdom4425 Posts
On October 09 2011 23:38 Ises wrote: Not the Thorzain we saw in Dreamhack valencia :< Definitely, but that's also a problem with this just being Bo3. | ||
|
Vertical
Indonesia4317 Posts
 | ||
|
KillerSOS
United States4207 Posts
| ||
|
Fushin
France193 Posts
But i'm not objective since I feel like Thorzain suffers a big lack of charisma :/ | ||
|
Ryder.
1117 Posts
I reallly should go to sleep | ||
|
tuestresfat
2555 Posts
| ||
|
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
| ||
| ||
