|
Alright, its truly time to stop whining. Stop caster bashing also. Be warned. |
On July 31 2011 03:25 Sacro wrote: Man qxc is so good, tought he was in a really bad possition after the worker harasse, but he magically got back into it!
He was in a really bad position, but his counter harass killed ~22 scvs, so he was still up in workers, but had half the tanks.
|
Holy crap this game looks like BW. Good game bros!
|
dat manner scan
edit: i mean "dose"
|
Dat mass scan BM, I love it! Go Rain
|
|
|
Note to self: make more Thors in TvT
|
Rain dropped like 3 scans in the same place there, not that it mattered.
|
|
manner scans ahahahahahha
|
Were those manner scans or misclicks? lol
|
118 supply vs 175 dayuuum son
|
On July 31 2011 03:27 Morta wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2011 03:27 Maliris wrote: their macro is really bad, floating 2k minerals each ;s Mules brah. ;D You usually float minerals with mech
|
Beyonder
Netherlands15103 Posts
On July 31 2011 03:27 Maliris wrote: their macro is really bad, floating 2k minerals each ;s Guess what their units rely on? GAS. Guess what you cant do in this game? MAKE MORE THAN 200 supply. T_T
|
On July 31 2011 03:28 VGhost wrote: Rain dropped like 3 scans in the same place there, not that it mattered. It's known as a flower scan.
|
|
|
mrbitter's bias is ruining these games for me
|
On July 31 2011 03:28 Beyonder wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2011 03:27 Maliris wrote: their macro is really bad, floating 2k minerals each ;s Guess what their units rely on? GAS. Guess what you cant do in this game? MAKE MORE THAN 200 supply. T_T Yeah, it is common for Zerg and TvT to have 2k minerals in the late game. Zerglings and Marines in TvT can't really do much.
|
On July 31 2011 03:28 Beyonder wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2011 03:27 Maliris wrote: their macro is really bad, floating 2k minerals each ;s Guess what their units rely on? GAS. Guess what you cant do in this game? MAKE MORE THAN 200 supply. T_T Guess what you're using now? Common sense. Guess what most people don't understand? Indeed.
|
|
|
|