EPTOn July 31 2011 06:36 Inconspicuous wrote:
Oh Day[9], so silly.
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/1hp9i.png)
Oh Day[9], so silly.
that was so fast, i am terrified
MLG Anaheim Day 2 RED Live Report Thread - Page 228
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Alright, its truly time to stop whining. Stop caster bashing also. Be warned. | ||
|
FenneK
France1231 Posts
that was so fast, i am terrified | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:36 Highblade wrote: Does anyone know how I can check the current internet usage of the stream? DL Bandwidth monitor. | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:36 Drazerk wrote: Game two on Tal'darim alter In the top right is  IncontrolWhile in the bottom left is  Boxer 1:50 Barracks / gateway in production | ||
|
adeptz
Australia220 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:36 FXOpen wrote: Never thought I would say this.. But I kinda want incontrol to win this one. Why? | ||
|
Demonaz
United Kingdom1219 Posts
| ||
|
DyEnasTy
United States3714 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:35 iamke55 wrote: Boxer is 100x better than incontrol regardless of which builds they use... I wouldnt be that skewed about it. Im detecting some animosity toward incontrol here. | ||
MoonBear
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:36 MoonBear wrote: Match 2: Tal'Darim Altar  iNcontroL 0 vs 1  BoxeRiNcontroL spawns as the Red Protoss @1BoxeR spawns as the Blue Terran @7Crossmap! Incontrol scouts before building his gate at 14. Boxer opening Rax no gas. | ||
|
Zarahtra
Iceland4053 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:35 Neplusultra wrote: someone doesnt know incontrol's trollish and sarcastic manner He's actually very manner ingame. People say he does it just for the public, but no matter, he's very GM ingame. | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:36 xXFireandIceXx wrote: lol incontrol wants to test boxer's late game I would too. Boxer's macro is his weakest part of his game. | ||
|
Deadiam
United States69 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:35 iamke55 wrote: Boxer is 100x better than incontrol regardless of which builds they use... This ... EGIncontrol consistantly fails to put up results and I fully expect him to get dominated by Boxer. | ||
|
nooboon
2602 Posts
| ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:37 JoeSchmoe wrote: it's actually true. every GSL protoss had immortals to deal with this. incontrol makes cannons against siege tanks. And still they died horribly. | ||
|
snifit
Canada217 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:35 Coriolis wrote: GSL 1 actually. Poltprime created it and used it during a match on scrap station. Polt's build was the raven PDD all-in. | ||
ZeromuS
Canada13389 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:32 Troublesome wrote: I am so freaking sick of seeing this all-in. It produces terrible one-sided games. Protoss has to play PERFECTLY to defend. Well not really Toss just needs to scout it and then tech collossus. At that point you keep an obs back and safe if theres a raven pull back stalkers once the PDD is down and have mainly zealots. I mean it requires a particular response but it is important to note that the map xel naga is bad for really fast expos in TvP or PvT. The two entrances/chokes to nat are pretty hairy to defend if you went fast expo and the opponent focused on army. Even with bunkers the 3 gate is very good on the map due to the big nat which is what Incontrol went for when he saw the 2 rax pressure. Similarly the 2 rax does very well thanks to the open natural as well. The reasons above are why I am a fan of the 2 gate fast robo opening on the map thanks to the observer and the ability to get a good read on this map. Even if T gets a slightly earlier expo on xel Toss isnt really behind because once the nat is up forcefields really help hold the natural thanks to the 2 small chokes. As long as T doesnt get a fast gold base Toss can take the nat a little bit later so a 2 rax expo getting the T nat CC made 1 minute before Toss isnt too too bad. Any early push after an opening like that from T is pretty weak compared to where toss is with the army at that time. | ||
|
Dametri
United States726 Posts
Speshul Tactics | ||
|
KimJongChill
United States6429 Posts
lol why? | ||
|
Ryzu
United States369 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:37 JoeSchmoe wrote: it's actually true. every GSL protoss had immortals to deal with this. incontrol makes cannons against siege tanks. And even then they lose to it. | ||
|
Corrik
United States1416 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:35 Yaotzin wrote: 4 zealots wouldn't have changed the result whatsoever. It almost never would've. You HAVE to expand, or they can just set up bunkers+siege tanks at your nat and you're dead anyway. Uh, he would have had a lot more than 4 zealots! 400 for the Nexus, 100 for the Pylon. 500 Minerals on paper. But, that's 500 minerals way earlier to use which could have been more units, more tech, or more production facilities. I assume he was producing probes continuously so it wouldn't have affected that, but it would have given him a lot more to use (whether it be faster colossi or such). | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
For another game ;D | ||
|
Monocle
United States1509 Posts
On July 31 2011 06:37 Demonaz wrote: I can't believe Boxer beat Idra, just catching up on results now. GO EMPEROR! Not just beat. Crushed. | ||
| ||
