|
On July 06 2011 21:07 ckast wrote: bomber vs polt...dude..i wish polt can win but bomber is such a beast... um wait..he took out MMA 4-0 so who knows MMA is in Code B now though.
|
for the sake of RO16 MC should better lose now. If he's not losing, no matter who wins, the tread will be spammed by "NO HUK" or "YEAH HUK" and oh NO MC or YES MC
|
On July 06 2011 21:07 ElusoryX wrote: omg yes huk 2-0! i can see him winnin the gsl...
hehe, he pretty much owned both enemies
|
Canada13379 Posts
On July 06 2011 21:06 WindCalibur wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2011 21:05 Dommk wrote:On July 06 2011 21:04 Fyzar wrote:On July 06 2011 21:03 Goibon wrote:On July 06 2011 21:01 Fyzar wrote:On July 06 2011 21:01 Goibon wrote: You know those "play of the week" videos the IPL put out?
Well that had to be close to #1
Even better than the Archon by Killer What was so amazing about it? Might have won the game for Bomber? I dunno man, that's enough for me. Not often you see something that significant happen. What scares me is that there's always the chance it was default tank AI which did it, and maybe Bomber got lucky. That would suck. Yeah no, I liked on what moment it came, it certainly saved him. But I don't see what was amazing about what he did ;>? He targeted banelings which pretty much every terran does, right? Tanks auto target banelings because they have priority over lings. Not sure whether or not it was a target, but if it was then it was a hell of a shot I thought tanks fire at the closest thing they can fire at...
You need to purposely fire on the banelings unless banelings started coming before the lings did. Its part of the reason you send immortals in first, the tanks will decide the immortals take priority since they show up first.
Source: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Attack_Target_Priority
|
On July 06 2011 21:06 WindCalibur wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2011 21:05 Dommk wrote:On July 06 2011 21:04 Fyzar wrote:On July 06 2011 21:03 Goibon wrote:On July 06 2011 21:01 Fyzar wrote:On July 06 2011 21:01 Goibon wrote: You know those "play of the week" videos the IPL put out?
Well that had to be close to #1
Even better than the Archon by Killer What was so amazing about it? Might have won the game for Bomber? I dunno man, that's enough for me. Not often you see something that significant happen. What scares me is that there's always the chance it was default tank AI which did it, and maybe Bomber got lucky. That would suck. Yeah no, I liked on what moment it came, it certainly saved him. But I don't see what was amazing about what he did ;>? He targeted banelings which pretty much every terran does, right? Tanks auto target banelings because they have priority over lings. Not sure whether or not it was a target, but if it was then it was a hell of a shot I thought tanks fire at the closest thing they can fire at... No, casters and banelings have higher priority. This priority targetting applies to any unit with an attack, they will always prefer casters if in range.
You need to purposely fire on the banelings unless banelings started coming before the lings did. Its part of the reason you send immortals in first, the tanks will decide the immortals take priority since they show up first.
Target priority is chosen when the unit attacks. If the Tank sieges up and the banelings run in before it fires then the tank will fire on the banes.
|
Aotearoa39261 Posts
Since the winner is vs Huk, I hope Kyrix wins because I dont want huk to have to team kill plus it will give huk extra incentive if kyrix wins ^^
|
On July 06 2011 21:06 WindCalibur wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2011 21:05 Dommk wrote:On July 06 2011 21:04 Fyzar wrote:On July 06 2011 21:03 Goibon wrote:On July 06 2011 21:01 Fyzar wrote:On July 06 2011 21:01 Goibon wrote: You know those "play of the week" videos the IPL put out?
Well that had to be close to #1
Even better than the Archon by Killer What was so amazing about it? Might have won the game for Bomber? I dunno man, that's enough for me. Not often you see something that significant happen. What scares me is that there's always the chance it was default tank AI which did it, and maybe Bomber got lucky. That would suck. Yeah no, I liked on what moment it came, it certainly saved him. But I don't see what was amazing about what he did ;>? He targeted banelings which pretty much every terran does, right? Tanks auto target banelings because they have priority over lings. Not sure whether or not it was a target, but if it was then it was a hell of a shot I thought tanks fire at the closest thing they can fire at...
Yeah, tanks autotargeting banelings would be new to me, that's why it's so important to do it on your own. But where there even lings left in the range of the tanks?
|
On July 06 2011 21:05 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2011 21:05 StyLeD wrote:On July 06 2011 21:04 SelK wrote:So if MC wins, it's going to be HuK vs MC in RO16 ?  Yep. Either way a super strong player will go to RO8, and with Bomber, Nestea, etc still there, it looks to be the best GSL finals yet ;D edit: Forgot about Nada too O_O Don't jinx it! Hongun vs Trickster. I'm calling it now.
|
On July 06 2011 21:01 zimms wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2011 20:58 JunkkaGom wrote:On July 06 2011 20:57 zimms wrote: If you play the game of drones, you win or you die. well done. best post ever True that. But it's not from me, it's from the Idra Fanclub. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/7gnlS.jpg)
I'm not catching the cleverness. If you play SC2 you win or you die.
|
Korea (South)855 Posts
On July 06 2011 21:07 ckast wrote: bomber vs polt...dude..i wish polt can win but bomber is such a beast... um wait..he took out MMA 4-0 so who knows polt normally does better against stronger player
|
On July 06 2011 21:08 VirgilSC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2011 21:07 ckast wrote: bomber vs polt...dude..i wish polt can win but bomber is such a beast... um wait..he took out MMA 4-0 so who knows MMA is in Code B now though.
ya..a guy who won every TVT to get to the final and drop to code B because of a non TvT game
|
On July 06 2011 21:08 BlindDruid wrote: for the sake of RO16 MC should better lose now. If he's not losing, no matter who wins, the tread will be spammed by "NO HUK" or "YEAH HUK" and oh NO MC or YES MC This makes no sense. Just thought you should know that.
|
United States97275 Posts
On July 06 2011 21:09 Eufouria wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2011 21:05 Shellshock1122 wrote:On July 06 2011 21:05 StyLeD wrote:On July 06 2011 21:04 SelK wrote:So if MC wins, it's going to be HuK vs MC in RO16 ?  Yep. Either way a super strong player will go to RO8, and with Bomber, Nestea, etc still there, it looks to be the best GSL finals yet ;D edit: Forgot about Nada too O_O Don't jinx it! Hongun vs Trickster. I'm calling it now. not 1-sided enough. Hongun vs Nestea. Hongun wins 4-1
|
On July 06 2011 21:08 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2011 21:07 rpgalon wrote: why Huk, Why you Had to 2-0 your group....! It's not like it was going to be any better if he went 2-1. MC or Bomber. Pretty much a shitty draw either way I'd say Huk has a better chance at beating MC than Bomber...
|
|
On July 06 2011 21:07 rpgalon wrote: why Huk, Why you Had to 2-0 your group....!
I'd prefer him play against MC than Bomber.
That Bomber guy really knows how to abuse everything to get an edge, what a baller.
|
|
On July 06 2011 20:48 Sc2Null wrote: sooo...From GSL May runner-up...to up/down matches..lol?
GSL curse!
|
On July 06 2011 21:08 Dommk wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2011 21:06 WindCalibur wrote:On July 06 2011 21:05 Dommk wrote:On July 06 2011 21:04 Fyzar wrote:On July 06 2011 21:03 Goibon wrote:On July 06 2011 21:01 Fyzar wrote:On July 06 2011 21:01 Goibon wrote: You know those "play of the week" videos the IPL put out?
Well that had to be close to #1
Even better than the Archon by Killer What was so amazing about it? Might have won the game for Bomber? I dunno man, that's enough for me. Not often you see something that significant happen. What scares me is that there's always the chance it was default tank AI which did it, and maybe Bomber got lucky. That would suck. Yeah no, I liked on what moment it came, it certainly saved him. But I don't see what was amazing about what he did ;>? He targeted banelings which pretty much every terran does, right? Tanks auto target banelings because they have priority over lings. Not sure whether or not it was a target, but if it was then it was a hell of a shot I thought tanks fire at the closest thing they can fire at... No, casters and banelings have higher priority. This priority targetting applies to any unit with an attack, they will always prefer casters if in range. For the caster I'm 100% sure it's not true. Baneling I have to verify but sure it's not true. in fact http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Attack_Target_Priority edit : burned 2 times
|
On July 06 2011 21:08 Dommk wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2011 21:06 WindCalibur wrote:On July 06 2011 21:05 Dommk wrote:On July 06 2011 21:04 Fyzar wrote:On July 06 2011 21:03 Goibon wrote:On July 06 2011 21:01 Fyzar wrote:On July 06 2011 21:01 Goibon wrote: You know those "play of the week" videos the IPL put out?
Well that had to be close to #1
Even better than the Archon by Killer What was so amazing about it? Might have won the game for Bomber? I dunno man, that's enough for me. Not often you see something that significant happen. What scares me is that there's always the chance it was default tank AI which did it, and maybe Bomber got lucky. That would suck. Yeah no, I liked on what moment it came, it certainly saved him. But I don't see what was amazing about what he did ;>? He targeted banelings which pretty much every terran does, right? Tanks auto target banelings because they have priority over lings. Not sure whether or not it was a target, but if it was then it was a hell of a shot I thought tanks fire at the closest thing they can fire at... No, casters and banelings have higher priority. This priority targetting applies to any unit with an attack, they will always prefer casters if in range.
Do you have a source for that?
|
|
|
|