|
Sadly after all this time with so many tournament threads it still is not clear to many users on this site. There are several types of posts that are not acceptable in tournament threads. Any form of:
Imbalance whine/Player bashing/Caster bashing/Stream complaining
Will result in two day to a week long bans even for first offenses. Please stick to the games at hand and enjoy yourselves with a beautiful event such as this and the free service that comes with it. |
On June 20 2011 04:47 Gigaudas wrote: I wonder if foreigners are too nervous against Koreans. Another Terran doing the exact same thing wouldn't won as easily, no matter the control.
No that's just tough to hold... very tough if you don't scout and don't have a small ramp to control...
|
bombers about to win me some money
|
On June 20 2011 04:50 mr_tolkien wrote:Show nested quote +On June 20 2011 04:49 jj33 wrote: after 10 years of bw, it's amazing how so many people don't know what a all in is.
that wasn't an all in. bomber knew he damage and slowed down hasubos by alot, brought those scvs for extra meat, that's not an allin. So what was he going to do after it ?
these pros, make calculated moves.
He didn't bring all his scvs, he had mules, he had a good econ behind that push.
even if somehow he didn't flatout kill hasuobs with that push, he would have crippled him even moreso. the fact that he would still have a better econ with another push coming or expo behind that push, is not an all in.
all in is basically do or die.
that wasn't do or die.
|
On June 20 2011 04:49 jj33 wrote: after 10 years of bw, it's amazing how so many people don't know what a all in is.
that wasn't an all in. bomber knew he damage and slowed down hasubos by alot, brought those scvs for extra meat, that's not an allin. That was an all in, I could tell from the pixels and seeing a lot of all ins in my time.
|
People still think 'all-in' is a synonym for 'attack'? The SC2 lexicon has been destroyed by people who lack rational thinking or logic.
|
|
It was a beautiful all in. Used to the cloaked banshee to soften him up and scout that it would work and then just rolled him easilly. Nothing wrong with all ins/rushing, it's not like Bomber can't play late game. This unpredictibility is what makes players like MC and Bomber so scary.
|
On June 20 2011 04:50 xza wrote:Show nested quote +On June 20 2011 04:49 Kaliver wrote:On June 20 2011 04:47 xza wrote: whats the song on day9 stream? Skrillex - With Your Friends ' thank you!
As promised, I am forever grateful.
|
On June 20 2011 04:52 jj33 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 20 2011 04:50 mr_tolkien wrote:On June 20 2011 04:49 jj33 wrote: after 10 years of bw, it's amazing how so many people don't know what a all in is.
that wasn't an all in. bomber knew he damage and slowed down hasubos by alot, brought those scvs for extra meat, that's not an allin. So what was he going to do after it ? these pros, make calculated moves. He didn't bring all his scvs, he had mules, he had a good econ behind that push. even if somehow he didn't flatout kill hasuobs with that push, he would have crippled him even moreso. the fact that he would still have a better econ with another push coming or expo behind that push, is not an all in. all in is basically do or die. that wasn't do or die.
yes it was
|
On June 20 2011 04:52 Brutus wrote:Show nested quote +On June 20 2011 04:49 TeWy wrote:On June 20 2011 04:47 Brutus wrote:On June 20 2011 04:47 TeWy wrote: Just a counter build, not an all-in.
Bomber didn't randomly toke all his SCV out of the mineral line because he thought his skill level didn't match with hasu. lol what does this even mean That low league players label good timing attacks as being "all-in" which I think is stupid. All-in is a pejorative word that should be reserved for blind early pool or 4 gates... You think what bomber did wasn't an all in?
Of course not he still has mules dude data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt=""
|
On June 20 2011 04:50 AsnSensation wrote:Show nested quote +On June 20 2011 04:48 Yaotzin wrote: Colloxen never help hold that push. Dont get why Hasu teched to it. what else? more gateway units and let the stalkers fire while the PDD rofl's u hard? it's impossible to hold that if u expanded and had an unfortunate scouting path Yes gateway units. Expanding early is fine actually, easily pays for itself.
|
On June 20 2011 04:49 jj33 wrote: after 10 years of bw, it's amazing how so many people don't know what a all in is.
that wasn't an all in. bomber knew he damage and slowed down hasubos by alot, brought those scvs for extra meat, that's not an allin.
What's unbelievable is that you claim to have followed BW for 10 years and still refer to that as standard play lmao
|
On June 20 2011 04:51 Torte de Lini wrote:Show nested quote +On June 20 2011 04:50 videogames wrote:On June 20 2011 04:49 jj33 wrote: after 10 years of bw, it's amazing how so many people don't know what a all in is.
that wasn't an all in. bomber knew he damage and slowed down hasubos by alot, brought those scvs for extra meat, that's not an allin. Yeah 1 basing for 10 minutes then bringing all your scvs for the push is totally standard play. ICCUP.tv just said it was an all-in. 2 to 1?
if they said that, then it most likely wasn't
|
On June 20 2011 04:50 SpecFire wrote:Quick question guys: 1. Single elimination for brackets or double? 2. Are http://dreamhack.binarybeast.com/xSC21106162 these brackets right? B.c. I swear Sen/Sase was on MC's side buut now they are on a different side. Bomber and MC possible RO8 then? 3. How did Thorzain do? 4. Is MC Idra on at 10 CET time? 5. are there VODS/saved casts on justintv? link? 1. Single 2. Yes they are correct 3. Failed to get out of the group stage. He lost to Hasu and july to finish 3rd in his group (behind Hasu and July). 4. MC vs. IdrA should be on in 10 minutes.
|
what happened g1 ???? T_T
|
On June 20 2011 04:49 crappen wrote:Show nested quote +On June 20 2011 04:47 lunchforthesky wrote:On June 20 2011 04:46 Topdoller wrote:On June 20 2011 04:38 Seditary wrote:On June 20 2011 04:36 crappen wrote:On June 20 2011 04:30 bennyaus wrote:On June 20 2011 04:29 DoomsVille wrote: Well Huks finally going to start facing some real competition now. He had a relatively easy group and faced probably the weakest first round opponent.
Let's see if he has improved his PvP against Socke. Socke doesn't exactly have an amazing PvP record either so it could be time for Huk to break out.
Huk always has strange tournament experiences... either has an easy road or a ridiculously difficult road... rarely gets something in the middle lol His group was decent, not sure what this myth is about it being bad. I mean, maybe he just made the players look bad. Lalush in particular has been pretty good recently. Moon and Tarson aren't bad either. Still, easy compared to others. Lalush was horrible in that last game on Shakuras. So passive, was choking really hard it seemed. July, my new favourite zerg this tournament, he loses with his balls intact, if that should happen. The way July plays, he either smashes his balls into the other player, or into himself. Julys balls wouldn't fit in a dump truck, they are that big !! Indeed. July is the guy who 6 pools when he's 1-1 in a Bo3. If July wins Dreamhack, it wasnt a korean that won, it was God. I didnt watch July in BW, but I see why they call him God of War.
Dont say Flash's name in vain..."God Yong Ho" its one of his nick names
|
On June 20 2011 04:51 mitthrawn wrote: Khaldor's co-caster whining about "all-ins" makes it so worth it. Thank you bomber. <3
hahaha yea. im laughing my ass off. he impersonates the kinda nerd i imagine when reading most of the balance-whine threads here on TL :D
|
Theres no such thing as a terran all-in
|
that wasn't an all in. bomber knew he damage and slowed down hasubos by alot, brought those scvs for extra meat, that's not an allin.
That was all or nothing! If the attack failed and he lost all this SCVs it would be 1 Base Terran with like 10SCVs vs 2 Base Toss...it would be game over
|
NO I REFUSE TO HAVE THIS THREAD FILLED BY ANOTHER ALL IN ARGUMENT WHO CARES
|
|
|
|