EPT[NASL] Day 6-4 - Page 36
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
catamorphist
United States297 Posts
| ||
|
Pajegetc
United States3158 Posts
| ||
|
Figgy
Canada1788 Posts
| ||
|
Darclite
United States1021 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Leviance
Germany4079 Posts
| ||
|
Xxavi
United States1248 Posts
| ||
|
Kamais_Ookin
Canada4218 Posts
 | ||
|
Pajegetc
United States3158 Posts
On May 22 2011 12:54 Figgy wrote: MC's micro is horrible, the korean lag is really showing here. Makes me sad. Stop with the excuses, he was outplayed. | ||
|
nufcrulz
Singapore934 Posts
| ||
|
Wargizmo
Australia1237 Posts
On May 22 2011 12:54 catamorphist wrote: Like Incontrol said, HasuObs's girth is too great for MC. MC can't take it much longer. He obviously doesn't realise that it's Length TIMES Girth divided by yaw that really matters. | ||
|
gideel
1503 Posts
| ||
|
cynical
Canada589 Posts
| ||
|
hugedong
United States510 Posts
On May 22 2011 12:55 Xxavi wrote: I rooted for MC for a long time, but I am tired of seeing early game pushes from him. I know that Hasu was going to do the same, but is it too much to ask to show something different?! If you had the best micro in the entire game, you would do it too. | ||
|
Trsjnica
United States477 Posts
| ||
|
Moonwrath
United States9568 Posts
| ||
|
Leviance
Germany4079 Posts
On May 22 2011 12:54 Figgy wrote: MC's micro is horrible, the korean lag is really showing here. Makes me sad. if he is going for such a micro intensive strategy, it's even more his fault then. Besides that I don't think the lag was to blame in this game. | ||
|
hugedong
United States510 Posts
That was a completely micro oriented situation. No outplaying happened. | ||
|
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
On May 22 2011 12:57 Trsjnica wrote: It is hard to not blame lag when MC is doing so poorly in the NASL. He is 18-3 in PvP games on TLPD. This. His PvP record is ridiculous and so far, most of the PvPs he's dropped has been in online tournaments . You can't say that correlation means nothing. | ||
| ||
