EPTOverall just good changes and the double elimination code s tournament is gonna be soooo sick.
GSL + GSTL format changes. - Page 13
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Finrod1
Germany3997 Posts
Overall just good changes and the double elimination code s tournament is gonna be soooo sick. | ||
|
Freak705
Canada231 Posts
GOM: ![[image loading]](http://dropdeadcomedians.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/1726009-shut_up_and_take_my_money_super.jpg) | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18419 Posts
| ||
|
Indrium
United States2236 Posts
| ||
|
ishboh
United States954 Posts
| ||
|
awu25
United States2003 Posts
15 players play in 5 player groups = 3 groups Top two players = 6 people 6 people from code A + 1 person from MLG = 7 people going into code S? Meaning there's still one code S spot open? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18419 Posts
On May 19 2011 21:40 awu25 wrote: I dunno if this was answered already regarding this: In the actual 'Up-and-Down' matches, it will be played by 8 players in Code S who got knocked down with 7 top players from code A. 15 players will play in 5 player group with top two players in the group advancing to code S. 15 players play in 5 player groups = 3 groups Top two players = 6 people 6 people from code A + 1 person from MLG = 7 people going into code S? Meaning there's still one code S spot open? Winner of Code A gets a spot in Code S. | ||
|
awu25
United States2003 Posts
Ahh thanks, I knew I was probably missing something | ||
|
DiamondTear
Finland165 Posts
| ||
|
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
Don't like the changes in the up-and-down matches though, makes rising from Code A to Code S and falling from Code S to Code A tougher. And, in my opinion, there are still some players currently in Code A that deserve to be in Code S and some players currently in Code S that should be in Code A. | ||
|
pieman819
Australia457 Posts
On May 19 2011 21:46 DiamondTear wrote: If MLG winner declines it will be given to the MLG runner up and not the Code A runner up, did I understand correctly? yes | ||
|
MoreFaSho
United States1427 Posts
| ||
|
TheBJ
Bulgaria906 Posts
| ||
|
Jesushooves
Canada553 Posts
I guess some people listened to Xeris' post. ^^ | ||
|
Cosmos
Belgium1077 Posts
| ||
Adebisi
Canada1637 Posts
| ||
|
Hibahihi
United States67 Posts
http://www.gomtv.net/2011super1/news/65340 | ||
|
StorM__
Germany118 Posts
| ||
|
NHY
1013 Posts
On May 19 2011 21:08 vx70GTOJudgexv wrote: Could be like Shinhan PL does it. G1: #3 vs. #6 G2: #4 vs. #5 G3: Winner of G1 vs. Winner of G2 G4: Winner of G3 vs. #2 G5: Winner of G4 vs. #1 Or similar to NFL playoffs: G1: #3 vs. #6 G2: #4 vs. #5 G3: Winner of G1 vs. #2 G4: Winner of G2 vs. #1 G5: Winner of G3 vs. Winner of G4 This is awesome. All of the changes are. Dual tournament groups is amazing, with so much more potential. GSTL sticking around is awesome. We're starting to see some nice development into a much more fluid format with GSL and a standing for teams in GSTL. Hopefully we see some more regimented team practicing a la BW teams now that there's a team league regularly. G1: #2 from Group B vs. #3 from Group A G2: #2 from Group A vs. #3 from Group B G3: Winner of G1 vs. #1 from Group A G4: Winner of G2 vs. #1 from Group B G5: Winner of G3 vs. Winner of G4 Same way they did playoff in IEM V. | ||
|
pompey606
United Kingdom98 Posts
| ||
| ||
... which is not correct cause that would be a bit weird!
