|
On May 02 2011 12:59 drox22 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 12:54 Vul wrote:On May 02 2011 12:52 tomatriedes wrote:On May 02 2011 12:47 rolfe wrote:On May 02 2011 12:43 drox22 wrote:On May 02 2011 12:40 Duoma wrote:On May 02 2011 12:33 drox22 wrote:On May 02 2011 12:32 Duoma wrote:On May 02 2011 12:29 drox22 wrote:nobody cares, this is the NASL thread stop with this offtopic bs pls Not too bright are you? There is a big difference between off topic "bs" and important occurrences. I'm sure the Op was jut trying to notify people that something slightly more significant that a starcraft game happened. Try to sound a little less like a narcissistic 12 year old. it's not important because this is the NASL thread. it's offtopic and 99% of the world don't care. yes a person died what does it change... exactly NOTHING, now stop with this offtopic nonsense this is the nasl thread. thank you!! Dear god.... Either you are trolling or you suffer some sort of mental condition. Either way team liquid probably isn't the place for you! Back in the land of the sacred "on-topic" LR, that is a lot of mutas. Don't know if boxer has this. No, I'm not trolling at all, 99% of the world don't care and there is thousands of people dying all over the world every single day. This is huge news for americans, but the ROTW doesn't care and you don't have to spam and derail every single thread with this now, there already is a 'Osama Bin laden killed' thread, take this bullshit and discuss it there. Europeans don't spam threads either when something huge for them happens, I expect the same respect from americans. Thanks again. if you don't see that this matters to more people than americans then i pity you It matters a lot, but there are a lot of important things in the world and if we try to discuss them all during LR threads we won't get much on-topic posting. I understand it's important news and I don't particularly mind that the guy posted it but it makes more sense to keep other news in the general section. I think we all agree that its way off topic, and people will disagree about whether its more important to obey forum rules or not in certain situations. But calling it BS and that it doesn't matter to anyone and so on is just idiotic and offensive The reason I called it bs is because it's offtopic, it's against the forum rules to discuss offtopic stuff in LR threads and people should actually be warned for that. Yes it is important for americans, but fact is that we can't discuss offtopic stuff in LR threads no matter how important it is, since there is alot of important things going on in the world. We would end up discussing pretty much everything in LR thread because nobody could then actually tell what is important to be discussed in LR thread and what isn't. It's not equally important to everyone, it's not like we found the man on the moon, a terrorist died, great happens every now and then, but this is not the thread to discuss this in.
Not to be rude but it just prob made people mad that some kid that has just joined TL is telling them whats appropriate for a LR thread. Also he is not just some terrorist he killed a lot of people and maybe its a little more important than a SC game. The original poster was just letting people know stop making yourself look very ignorant
|
On May 02 2011 13:02 PGriff wrote:I get frustrated when people start saying "OMG no GG he is BM!!" after someone doesnt say " good game." He's a competitor, he is pissed he lost no shit hes gonna be upset. They're both trying to win and socke isnt gonna go cry if he doesnt say gg who gives a shit. If you work that hard, but lose its gotta be so frustrating, noone is taking it personally just a tough game, and a frustrating loss
In my opinion it's even worse when people say that the person winning is not BM when they don't GG back, considering most pro players leave the instant they GG.
|
lol Gretorp you just dumb. Germans are some of the most polite people in the world..
|
On May 02 2011 13:08 TheTenthDoc wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 13:02 PGriff wrote:On May 02 2011 12:58 Dexington wrote:
When did Tyler get bm? I get frustrated when people start saying "OMG no GG he is BM!!" after someone doesnt say " good game." He's a competitor, he is pissed he lost no shit hes gonna be upset. They're both trying to win and socke isnt gonna go cry if he doesnt say gg who gives a shit. If you work that hard, but lose its gotta be so frustrating, noone is taking it personally just a tough game, and a frustrating loss In my opinion it's even worse when people say that the person winning is not BM when they don't GG back, considering most pro players leave the instant they GG.
GG= Good Game; Tyler was just frustrated that he lost as Socke went 1 base all-in he's just a competitive person. I have faith TYLER gogogo
|
Did Tyler not return the gl hf? I was eating so I could've just missed it. >_>
|
Can someone find me the video of EGIncontrol nodding his head to himself? that was an intermission during the nasl in the beginning...
plz send me the link via PM!!
|
On May 02 2011 12:59 drox22 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 12:54 Vul wrote:On May 02 2011 12:52 tomatriedes wrote:On May 02 2011 12:47 rolfe wrote:On May 02 2011 12:43 drox22 wrote:On May 02 2011 12:40 Duoma wrote:On May 02 2011 12:33 drox22 wrote:On May 02 2011 12:32 Duoma wrote:On May 02 2011 12:29 drox22 wrote:nobody cares, this is the NASL thread stop with this offtopic bs pls Not too bright are you? There is a big difference between off topic "bs" and important occurrences. I'm sure the Op was jut trying to notify people that something slightly more significant that a starcraft game happened. Try to sound a little less like a narcissistic 12 year old. it's not important because this is the NASL thread. it's offtopic and 99% of the world don't care. yes a person died what does it change... exactly NOTHING, now stop with this offtopic nonsense this is the nasl thread. thank you!! Dear god.... Either you are trolling or you suffer some sort of mental condition. Either way team liquid probably isn't the place for you! Back in the land of the sacred "on-topic" LR, that is a lot of mutas. Don't know if boxer has this. No, I'm not trolling at all, 99% of the world don't care and there is thousands of people dying all over the world every single day. This is huge news for americans, but the ROTW doesn't care and you don't have to spam and derail every single thread with this now, there already is a 'Osama Bin laden killed' thread, take this bullshit and discuss it there. Europeans don't spam threads either when something huge for them happens, I expect the same respect from americans. Thanks again. if you don't see that this matters to more people than americans then i pity you It matters a lot, but there are a lot of important things in the world and if we try to discuss them all during LR threads we won't get much on-topic posting. I understand it's important news and I don't particularly mind that the guy posted it but it makes more sense to keep other news in the general section. I think we all agree that its way off topic, and people will disagree about whether its more important to obey forum rules or not in certain situations. But calling it BS and that it doesn't matter to anyone and so on is just idiotic and offensive The reason I called it bs is because it's offtopic, it's against the forum rules to discuss offtopic stuff in LR threads and people should actually be warned for that. Yes it is important for americans, but fact is that we can't discuss offtopic stuff in LR threads no matter how important it is, since there is alot of important things going on in the world. We would end up discussing pretty much everything in LR thread because nobody could then actually tell what is important to be discussed in LR thread and what isn't. It's not equally important to everyone, it's not like we found the man on the moon, a terrorist died, great happens every now and then, but this is not the thread to discuss this in.
The start of all this was a simple link thrown into this thread. You are actually the one derailing this thread. The original post would already have been forgotten and would not have any current replies if you would not have started your diatribe about rules and whatnot.
|
I know that the community has been harsh to Gretorp in the past but today he kinda annoyed me for the first time:
Why dropped Gretorp this pseudo fact about Socke beeing on Team "meine" or "mine" to explain his name? He has never been on such a team (nSK, pG, TAMM, DkH, Shuuk, a-L, attax as far as my research goes) so please don't make stuff up just to have something to say...
Besides that some awesome games today!
|
I predict warp prism after 2nd immortal.
|
Heh, special tactics from Tyler.
|
|
|
On May 02 2011 12:47 Azarkon wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 12:44 proot wrote:
Boxer will never ever be good at TvZ, it requires such high mechanical play compared to the other match-ups. He really needs to fine tune his macro and positioning to win vs the better zergs. You say that, but Boxer's best MU is TvZ, and his positioning and micro are his strengths...
No, TvZ in BW was Boxers best MU. It is his worst in SC2. Yes he had some great games vs Sen, so that led me to believe me fixed it, but it still needs work.
Boxer's best MU in SC2 is TvT.
|
I haven't even been watching this game, but was this the "anti-4gate" build that Tyler and Day9 hinted at?
1 gate into robo, 2 more gates?
|
Tyler could've controlled that a lot better. I think it could've won right there
|
On May 02 2011 13:15 garlicface wrote:
I haven't even been watching this game, but was this the "anti-4gate" build that Tyler and Day9 hinted at?
1 gate into robo, 2 more gates?
Ya, he goes 10 gate opening skips the first zealot and gets a really quick robo then adds the 2nd gate and zealot
|
I think Tyler could have won if he went up to 4 gates instead of 3. When I saw him use this strat on his stream he had 4 gates, and I've been practicing it with 4 gates too after I saw him do it and it's pretty good.
|
i really want tyler to win
):
|
Tyler's build just tanks his economy too hard. A fast robo can be powerful but not at the cost of winding up with a worse economy than an aggressive 4-gate would have.
|
On May 02 2011 13:15 RaiKageRyu wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2011 12:47 Azarkon wrote:On May 02 2011 12:44 proot wrote:
Boxer will never ever be good at TvZ, it requires such high mechanical play compared to the other match-ups. He really needs to fine tune his macro and positioning to win vs the better zergs. You say that, but Boxer's best MU is TvZ, and his positioning and micro are his strengths... No, TvZ in BW was Boxers best MU. It is his worst in SC2. Yes he had some great games vs Sen, so that led me to believe me fixed it, but it still needs work. Boxer's best MU in SC2 is TvT.
Hmm, well I haven't been keeping up with GSL, but the last time I saw Boxer play TvT he did not look so hot in that MU. Things may have changed since then, though.
|
Australia8532 Posts
On May 02 2011 13:12 Turbo.Tactics wrote:
I know that the community has been harsh to Gretorp in the past but today he kinda annoyed me for the first time:
Why dropped Gretorp this pseudo fact about Socke beeing on Team "meine" or "mine" to explain his name? He has never been on such a team (nSK, pG, TAMM, DkH, Shuuk, a-L, attax as far as my research goes) so please don't make stuff up just to have something to say...
Besides that some awesome games today!
I don't know what makes you feel "your research" is more reliable than Gretorp who has actually spoken to the guy..
Tyler not looking to good here 
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
