Its time to enjoy the matches, keep the whining out of this thread. GL HF!
Also, don't reply to the whining and ignore it: have faith in the mods, we read every post and act swiftly. You're making it worse. Enjoy!

henreiman

United States407 Posts

April 17 2011 20:19 GMT

#3401

On April 18 2011 05:18 Gentso wrote:
I do believe that's why Blizzard changed that version of Shakuras. : |

Actually that was because of the TvZ tank pushes mostly. Sucks for Mondragon but Cruncher was just so cost effective that entire time, even while losing his bases he kept the units alive. And Mondi refilled 4-5x but just couldn't make it that 6th.

Creem

Sweden254 Posts

April 17 2011 20:19 GMT

#3402

On April 18 2011 05:17 DaCruise wrote:
WoW,,what a game,,excellent defense by Cruncher and impressive harras by Mondragon.

Sorry, what? Mondragon played roughly 10 times better than cruncher with drop play and crazy multitasking. In the end though all that was needed was gathering a critical number of void rays and a-move his way to victory.

/SADFUCKINGFACE

User was temp banned for this post.

Talin

Montenegro10532 Posts

April 17 2011 20:19 GMT

#3403

There are obvious dangers to Mondragon's style guys, and he lost a lot of momentum before he cracked Cruncher's defense.

Stop complaining.

Mondi will still take this though.

TheButtonmen

Canada1403 Posts

April 17 2011 20:19 GMT

#3404

On April 18 2011 05:17 garbanzo wrote:
Mondragon really needed more mutas than corruptors. I think they work much better against the void rays.

Guardian shield really really really shuts down Mutas.

castled

United States322 Posts

April 17 2011 20:19 GMT

#3405

On April 18 2011 05:18 ImHuko wrote:
I laugh everytime I see the third bulletpoint for Cruncher

^^ lol

should be
- Plays Protoss

User was warned for this post

edit: sry didn't mean for balance whine really just saying P strategies don't seem very varied recently against Z. Though crucher proved me wrong with the game on TDA!

ComTrav

United States1093 Posts

April 17 2011 20:19 GMT

#3406

On April 18 2011 05:19 Topdoller wrote:
Mondi is changing SC2 in a good way, pity Corrupters are such an epic fail

As I said earlier, I would like to see the impact on this MU if Zerg had a Viking Warren.

Kazang

578 Posts

April 17 2011 20:19 GMT

#3407

On April 18 2011 05:17 Drium wrote:
MONDI WHY WOULD YOU MAKE MUTAS?????

Because they are better and cheaper than corruptors against voidrays.

The Touch

United Kingdom667 Posts

April 17 2011 20:19 GMT

#3408

People aren't giving CrunCher enough credit. He defended all of Mondragon's harassment really well, managing to kill enough of Mondragon's units to make the army trading relatively ineffective and to prevent a massive amount of economic damage from being done.

Mondragon probably played a little better overall, but it wasn't the one-sided game that people are saying it was.

Whitewing

United States7483 Posts

April 17 2011 20:19 GMT

#3409

Guys, both players played well, neither really outplayed the other. It was very very close. Mondragon used a strat that abused the weaknesses of Cruncher's build, and did a lot of damage, but he also took a big hit doing it, and didn't execute as well as he could have.

If a bunch of those drops had been hydra drops, rather than roach drops, he likely would have won. The roaches just couldn't do enough damage.

cptKewk

Sweden87 Posts

April 17 2011 20:19 GMT

#3410

On April 18 2011 05:14 vommy wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

On April 18 2011 05:11 cptKewk wrote:
so I wasn't fast enough with the shooping but my friend noticed this

awesome pic :D

Why thank you =)

Froadac

United States6733 Posts

April 17 2011 20:19 GMT

#3411

On April 18 2011 05:19 shadowboxer wrote:

Show nested quote +

basically says it all.

Alright. Probably most accurate quote on game 2.

Noocta

France12578 Posts

April 17 2011 20:19 GMT

#3412

On April 18 2011 05:17 Fist wrote:
Why the fuck is everyone acting like Cruncher is the only Protoss who is going for a deathball?

Well, cruncher pvz on sharukas is so obviously abusive so he get most of the hate about that. :p

That's why blizzard change the map, but everyone still use the old imbalance old sharukas.

nvs.

Canada3609 Posts

April 17 2011 20:19 GMT

#3413

Games like that take the steam out of my love for SC.

Grrrrrrr.... poor mondi

Caphe

Vietnam10817 Posts

April 17 2011 20:20 GMT

#3414

On April 18 2011 05:18 IdrA wrote:
harass constantly!
keep protoss off balance!
overmake corruptors!

lol

I see, so you are actually taking note then. GL HF Idra.

Firebolt145

Lalalaland34496 Posts

April 17 2011 20:20 GMT

#3415

Every single time I go to the last page in this thread there is a new 2 pages for me to read. :<

Scorch

Austria3371 Posts

April 17 2011 20:20 GMT

#3416

Mondragon played incredibly well. His insane agression and multitasking make for very entertaining games. And if zerg's dedicated air to air unit didn't suck against void rays, he could have won with his style too.

Kimaker

United States2131 Posts

April 17 2011 20:20 GMT

#3417

On April 18 2011 05:18 travis wrote:
stop complaining people, jesus christ. not giving cruncher any credit at all... u don't realize how good his defensive play was. mondragon lost LOTS of units over and over. his play was amazing and great to watch but not all of it was that cost effective.

Travis, busting out the voice of reason again, what are you thinking? This is the internet! xD

Faveokatro

80 Posts

April 17 2011 20:20 GMT

#3418

Mondragon did everything right except saturate another base :-/ His income just fell really behind because I think he mined out of his main and nat and almost out of his third, so he was basically trying to max out on a base and a half at the end.

Mahs

Netherlands171 Posts

April 17 2011 20:20 GMT

#3419

I'm so impressed by Mondragon's play, such an amazing insight throughout the game, strategically such a strong player. Even though he lost, he's my hero.