Don't forget that NA >> Europe in the first round. Rock/paper/scissors for the win!
[TSL] Ro32 Day3 - Page 88
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
Don't forget that NA >> Europe in the first round. Rock/paper/scissors for the win! | ||
|
WingEn
84 Posts
By the way, it's 4AM in Korea. 3AM + when the series started. I'm pretty sure EU time is wayyyy closer to NA time. Adelscott played well but MVP played very badly due to delay. | ||
|
FliedLice
Germany7494 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:04 MiraKul wrote: -.- do u guys even know what's the time in Korea? So? The games were probably played a few days ago. | ||
|
cmgillett
United States335 Posts
| ||
|
Darkened
Bulgaria105 Posts
| ||
|
teko
Canada1197 Posts
Go foreigners! | ||
|
crawlingchaos
Canada2025 Posts
| ||
|
BoneDancr
United States130 Posts
GG Adelscott, WP. | ||
|
Node
United States2159 Posts
| ||
|
Kazzabiss
1006 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:02 dcemuser wrote: And before people complain about Genius's lag - game 1 is on KR, game 2 is on US, game 3 is on KR according to the rules. EU vs Korea is the only exception since it is unplayable. Nope, you're wrong, it will be the same problem, QXC lives in Europe right now. Playing to NA from EU is fine Playing to NA from KR is horrible | ||
|
Darksoldierr
Hungary2012 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:04 lurked wrote: You know that Adelscott is in EU and that they have a really similar lag, right? You can't blame that game on lag... Did you actually watch the games/listened to the casters? If you are not europian why you even comment on that? There is almost no lagg from EU to NA | ||
|
Argelia
59 Posts
| ||
|
confusedcrib
United States1307 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:03 Warpath wrote: Lag was definitely a factor in the games, but certainly not enough to change the outcome of those games. There is no way to make a claim like that. This best of 3 doesn't really prove anything, because of the lag. I wish TSL was offline ![]() | ||
|
theriv
United States149 Posts
| ||
|
Rhokdar
Denmark240 Posts
| ||
|
Powerpill
United States1693 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:04 vyyye wrote: I'm sure MVP was asking himself "What's the point in playing, I have delay!". Christ dude, get a grip. He was 1-0 to Adels 2-2, did it lag so much that he couldn't upgrade as well? Yea.. not killing Adel's 3rd when he could have easily after that first attack was also not due to lag, just an overly conservative decision imo. | ||
|
RogueStatus
266 Posts
Adelscott outplayed MVP.. lag had minimal impact and wouldn't have made a difference in my opinion. | ||
|
Gevna
France2332 Posts
GG Adel, so good decision making with insane builds. | ||
|
Rorschach
United States623 Posts
Its great though to know a stim/concussive/shields doesn't (and shouldn't) beat more expensive upgrades like charge/armour/blink. Adel teched to robo and than fell back on his superior ground upgrades... Great and entertaining games to watch! Very refreshing macro toss player.............. | ||
|
MahanS
Germany87 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:02 LuckyFool wrote: lag or no lag mvp was completely outplayed tactically and strategically both games. This. | ||
| ||

