EPT[GCPL Semi Final] Fnatic vs Liquid - Page 20
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Baum
Germany1010 Posts
| ||
|
tsuxiit
1305 Posts
| ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On March 11 2011 13:55 Baum wrote: Jinro played this one so poorly. It started with him making three bunkers at his natural against a teching and fast expanding protoss which enabled tt1 to take the gold for free and then he engaged at the worst possible spot when he hadn't enough vikings yet. I think he was dealing with lag or something. Engaging in that position was a huge issue although Jinro knew he was behind due to TT1's gold and so wanted to contest the Xel'Naga. Latency probably played a role in half his army getting FF'd though. I suppose if he had no latency he might've been able to pull back in time. But really he was behind on macro the entire game and the same is true of game 1. Don't know how that happened. Does latency really affect your macro as well? | ||
|
KawaiiRice
United States2914 Posts
ggs liquid | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On March 11 2011 13:56 tsuxiit wrote: Kawaii over Ret was a huge upset in my opinion. But looking at the games, especially Shakuras it just seemed like he got outplayed; I have no idea what to say. Ret vs. KawaiiRice was probably the closest match in the series. Really exciting games imo and you didn't know who was going to win until the very end of Game 3. | ||
|
TheHova
United Kingdom2612 Posts
On March 11 2011 13:57 Azarkon wrote: Engaging in that position was a huge issue although Jinro knew he was behind due to TT1's gold and so wanted to contest the Xel'Naga. Latency probably played a role in half his army getting FF'd though. I suppose if he had no latency he might've been able to pull back in time. But really he was behind on macro the entire game and the same is true of game 1. Don't know how that happened. Does latency really affect your macro as well? No, it's just people making excuses. Can't accept the fact that TT1 just played better than Jinro did. | ||
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
On March 11 2011 13:59 KawaiiRice wrote: i have no idea how it is from korea to NA but I play on Korea server all the time and the latency is not as bad as you guys are trying to make it seem... I can go mass rines vs zergs and micro fine most games. ggs liquid The latency was fine today, some days it sucks. Today was no issue. I think i played fine game 1 and 2 and i think i missed a ton of depots game 3. I also think anyone who says PvT is fine is an idiot, but primarily because terran cant win if protoss gets templars late game which wasnt really an issue in any of todays games. | ||
bkrow
Australia8532 Posts
True or not we will never know  congrats to fnatic - they looked so damn solid! | ||
|
hitman133
United States1425 Posts
On March 11 2011 13:59 KawaiiRice wrote: i have no idea how it is from korea to NA but I play on Korea server all the time and the latency is not as bad as you guys are trying to make it seem... I can go mass rines vs zergs and micro fine most games. ggs liquid yea, I play with my friend on US server when I was in Vietnam and there was no lag at all, and the internet speed was like 1.4 mbps so yea I dont think it's that bad | ||
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
| ||
|
PrimeTimey
Canada369 Posts
| ||
|
GeorgeForeman
United States1746 Posts
On March 11 2011 13:49 Finrod1 wrote: kinda bad play by jinro. don't know why jinro stayed with this only bio play vs mass colossus. anyway gratz to fnatic! Oddly, colossi also counter tanks pretty well. It's weird. | ||
|
Hrrrrm
United States2081 Posts
GG's | ||
|
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
On March 11 2011 13:55 Baum wrote: Jinro played this one so poorly. It started with him making three bunkers at his natural against a teching and fast expanding protoss which enabled tt1 to take the gold for free and then he engaged at the worst possible spot when he hadn't enough vikings yet. I think he was dealing with lag or something. Because I thought he was gonna 1 gate nex, 6 gate allin, I thought that was why he picked this map... I fucked up a ton of depots so had no army, and you need to fight around that area or your vikings are exposed. Not emping before the fight was a huge mistake of course. Not lag. | ||
|
Kimaker
United States2131 Posts
Was rooting for ya, but hey, can't win 'em all. I salute you FrozenArbiter  | ||
oXoCube
Canada197 Posts
| ||
|
Baby_Seal
United States360 Posts
Still, I'm sorry to see a 3-0 by Fnatic this series. The score doesn't do justice to the quality of the competition and how close this clan war actually was. | ||
|
Dingobloo
Australia1903 Posts
Still, I'm sorry to see a 3-0 by Fnatic this series. The score doesn't do justice to the quality of the competition and how close this clan war actually was. 100x So many close series there. | ||
|
Chicane
United States7875 Posts
On March 08 2011 10:32 shaunnn wrote: The guy with zero major results against any top players in last like 4-5 months? yes and I give him 0 chance against a player of rets calibre who just had a few months training in korea and has already established hes currently better than 90% of the wests top players at assembly. Posts like these are always classic. :D | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
Sen (Z) - ex-BW pro KawaiiRice (T) - ex-was-up-and-coming BW pro Iefnaij (P) - ex-BW pro Gretorp (T) - handsome ex-BW pro? TT1 (P) - ex-BW pro Fenix (T) - ex-BW pro Xeris (manager) So yeah, they have a pretty "deep" team, I'd say. Easily the most stacked with ex-BW pros. Could use one more Zerg though. | ||
| ||
