Quoted for truth. I thought the bunker defense was effective....
Because of rush distance that was just ownage though..... If there was more time and he actually pulled his drones out i feel like there woulda been more of a chance.

Mr_Kzimir

France268 Posts

November 29 2010 10:17 GMT

#308

It's not a meta game issue.

It's a map issue , SoW is just too small

Atlas_550

United States180 Posts

November 29 2010 10:17 GMT

#309

On November 29 2010 18:44 IdrA wrote:
wow
great matches today
newdawn vs maps
fruitdealer vs maps
ret vs maps
hongun vs jsl

go ret

I like you... You should come on my stream and play 2s sometime....

Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo

Germany2959 Posts

November 29 2010 10:17 GMT

#310

To be honest he had no more chance after that bunker opening.

Putting up a geysir, -4 Drones on minerals, building a Baneling Nest 100-50 and then getting ENOUGH Banelings IN time.
Nah, I mean 3-4 Banelings just don't do in that situation.

Immersion_

United Kingdom794 Posts

November 29 2010 10:17 GMT

#311

Oh get over it guys when ur "all-in" destroys him with that much to spare it means he won the game ages ago. Would u prefer a macro game where we already knew the result?

Vitamins

United States680 Posts

November 29 2010 10:17 GMT

#312

Perhaps it's just me, but there's a lot of damn whining about double barracks marine/scv all-ins. I still find them entertaining and great to watch. A win is a win, especially in GSL. ^^

HwangjaeTerran

Finland5967 Posts

November 29 2010 10:17 GMT

#313

This is hilarious. I'm going to start doing that too against zerg.
You'd think they have encountered this rush a billion times on the ladder already.

Shikyo

Finland33997 Posts

November 29 2010 10:17 GMT

#314

On November 29 2010 19:16 Shizuru~ wrote:

Show nested quote +

its steppes of war, what were you expecting from a TvZ game on that that map?

Vetoes. T_T

Can you stop that without a Banelingnest? Since you need like 5-6 spines to stop that.

wachnlurn

Korea (South)50 Posts

November 29 2010 10:17 GMT

#315

On November 29 2010 19:15 itsmeOrchiD wrote:
These SCV Marine all-ins are getting old.

if zerg would stop going hatch first...

Wargizmo

Australia1237 Posts

November 29 2010 10:17 GMT

#316

On November 29 2010 19:15 Beider wrote:
Tasteless made a boo boo

Trying to 1up his brother's antics at dreamhack

Corrik

United States1416 Posts

November 29 2010 10:17 GMT

#317

How can you blame the Terrans for the All-In rush? It is clearly because Zerg keep going FEs. If you don't want to see Marine + SCV All-Ins then convince the Zerg to stop FEing when there is a clear strategy to stop it now.

TehForce

1072 Posts

November 29 2010 10:17 GMT

#318

its such a shame that the players can't downvote ANY map. thats sooo bad and only produces boring games like that on steppes of war.

Reason.SC2

Canada1047 Posts

November 29 2010 10:17 GMT

#319

Will someone figure out that 90% of terrans are doing SCV marine all-ins and just roflstomp it?

Scorch

Austria3371 Posts

November 29 2010 10:17 GMT

#320

What's the point of the 10 hatch 10 pool build? From what I understand, it's neither really economic nor aggressive. It helps get out zerglings in time to hold the expansion, but is it worth it with so few drones? Wouldn't it be equally economic but safer to just expand later instead?