EPT[GSL] Ro64 Day 2 - Page 169
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
FreeUrMind
639 Posts
| ||
|
Sanguinarius
United States3427 Posts
| ||
|
frequency
Australia1901 Posts
| ||
|
FuRong
New Zealand3089 Posts
But then again...Marauders + EMP =/ | ||
|
Woony
Germany6657 Posts
On October 19 2010 21:04 frequency wrote: Just tuned in, what were the 'technical difficulties'? Mouse/Mousedriver didn't work for one player. | ||
|
UnholyRai
720 Posts
On October 19 2010 21:04 Sanguinarius wrote: I enjoy watching the macro games. However I am a bit tired of PvT P v T is my least favourite matchup to watch by far. | ||
|
NeoLearner
Belgium1847 Posts
Looking forward to HongUnPrime playing PvZ though. And the TvT is between 2 good players. I mean, FlintZenith was the one who took down Tester, right? | ||
|
drij
China61 Posts
| ||
|
Fa1nT
United States3423 Posts
On October 19 2010 21:06 UnholyRai wrote: P v T is my least favourite matchup to watch by far. Yeah, always marauder + viking vs colossus + stalkers + zealots It's been kinad fun today though, a lot of Thor/DT/void ray play. I want carriers  | ||
|
busbarn
Sweden984 Posts
| ||
|
TRAP[yoo]
Hungary6026 Posts
| ||
|
Lann555
Netherlands5173 Posts
| ||
|
kickazs
Norway540 Posts
| ||
|
kaleidoscope
Singapore2887 Posts
edit: ohh i thought that was set 3 >.< | ||
|
Barundar
Denmark1582 Posts
| ||
|
Sanguinarius
United States3427 Posts
| ||
|
Weavel
Finland9221 Posts
On October 19 2010 21:13 kaleidoscope wrote: Not over yet. Game number 3 coming up. one less protoss.. nice timing though.. | ||
|
Woony
Germany6657 Posts
On October 19 2010 21:13 Lann555 wrote: I'm shocked that we don't see this build A SHITTON more often. It's so insanely powerfull when executed properly I think Tester got out of the qualifiers to this build. It's so freaking hard to stop even if you know it's coming. | ||
|
Wayem
France455 Posts
| ||
|
Dfgj
Singapore5922 Posts
If you expand and go up to 5gate / stargate, you can pump out 2-3 phoenixes and a TON of units and hold it, but it's difficult and you're going to lose more in terms of resource value probably. | ||
| ||
