EPT
Would love to see PL-like league so we could see more games from Liquid players.GSL Season 2 Qualifiers Day 1 - Page 47
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
nukkuj
Finland403 Posts
Would love to see PL-like league so we could see more games from Liquid players. | ||
|
sammler
United Kingdom381 Posts
| ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
On October 10 2010 06:48 nukkuj wrote: Korea really needs more tournaments for SC2, so many excellent players not qualifying. Would love to see PL-like league so we could see more games from Liquid players.i believe we will see it happen soon, just need to give it some time. With the attention of such a huge prize pool and some of the greatest BW Celebrities of all time making the switch, it's only a matter of time. | ||
|
Voros
United States222 Posts
i dont understand why people are so surprised when artosis doesnt make it in the tournament... i am by no means making this a bash-artosis post as i have nothing against the dude.... just never considered him more than a mediocre player... unless he has some accomplishment in sc2 i havent heard of? I was under this impression as well, but when I rewatched his Ro64 games against NexFreeSaga, he's actually a very strong mechanical player with great multitasking skills. The only thing that will keep him out of many future GSLs is practice time. Too bad about Jinro and Haypro, but they'll have luck on their side sooner or later. Both are too strong to be left on the outside looking in for too much longer. How many games does a player have to lose overall to be eliminated from the qualifiers? Is it just a series of best-of-threes? | ||
|
Piski
Finland3461 Posts
On October 10 2010 07:17 Voros wrote: I was under this impression as well, but when I rewatched his Ro64 games against NexFreeSaga, he's actually a very strong mechanical player with great multitasking skills. The only thing that will keep him out of many future GSLs is practice time. Too bad about Jinro and Haypro, but they'll have luck on their side sooner or later. Both are too strong to be left on the outside looking in for too much longer. How many games does a player have to lose overall to be eliminated from the qualifiers? Is it just a series of best-of-threes? You have to beat something like 4 or 5 players in best of 3's to qualify. So it's a long journey. Losing even one of the best of 3's means you are out. | ||
|
OPSavioR
Sweden1465 Posts
artosis | ||
|
Raiznhell
Canada786 Posts
.Boxer's playing tomorrow? i hope he qualifies otherwise depression will settle in lol. | ||
|
Voros
United States222 Posts
You have to beat something like 4 or 5 players in best of 3's to qualify. So it's a long journey. Losing even one of the best of 3's means you are out. Thanks. It might be prohibitive given the number of applicants, but it would be nice to see the qualifers expanded into round robin to account for strength of bracket. The organizers have almost certainly seeded the brackets to avoid having one big name eliminate another before the Ro64 even starts, but it's a shame that strong players have to sit out for a month due to a single Bo3. | ||
|
HeIios
Sweden2523 Posts
On October 10 2010 07:37 Raiznhell wrote: Awh that sucks so bad Jinro and Haypro didnt cut it .Boxer's playing tomorrow? i hope he qualifies otherwise depression will settle in lol. I'm a bit worried, from what I've seen so far he hasn't been the powerhouse he once was. Imo he needs quite a bit more training... [edit] I don't understand the qualification process, can you explain further? Is it just one opponent after the other as soon as the previous winner moves on to the next person? It just doesn't seem like a fair way to adequatly find the best of the best... | ||
|
okaygo
United States83 Posts
IdrA fighting! | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
 | ||
|
zak
Korea (South)1009 Posts
On October 09 2010 22:53 enTee wrote: bad news imho. many no-names qualified. its okay give it some time, sc2 is a new game and thus new faces and new names will become our new stars. | ||
|
Ghad
Norway2551 Posts
On October 10 2010 06:48 nukkuj wrote: Korea really needs more tournaments for SC2, so many excellent players not qualifying. Would love to see PL-like league so we could see more games from Liquid players.This has been troubling me all day. It seems really counterproductive that the GSL is the only time koreans ever get to play actual games, when you see the huge smörgåsbord that the western players has to choose from. | ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
A good start: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=158801 | ||
Zelniq
United States7166 Posts
On October 10 2010 06:02 MrBitter wrote: 7 toss. 7 terran. 2 zerg. >.< purely coincidence. or purely lack of zerg players in general.. dont read into it, it doesnt mean anything at all, neither do any of the other 'lack of zerg' statistics that are so often seen. also pure chance that the 2 zerg who qualified happened to be 2 players very likely to make it very far into the tournament because of their high skill | ||
|
Pervect
1280 Posts
| ||
|
Senx
Sweden5901 Posts
ie nada / july / boxer etc? :D | ||
|
tertle
Australia328 Posts
don't quote me on that though | ||
|
abrasion
Australia722 Posts
On October 09 2010 21:05 Sfydjklm wrote: Gargoyles are exactly like Moutas in SC2, not so much SC1. And i dunno why you say i picked 3 units out of arsenal of 15. It's quiet obvious that Undead were based on Zerg from SCBW, and while they might not play like zerg now, they played out exactly like zerg when WC3 came out. There might be some similarities but UD for example do not need to FE, ever in War 3 - if anyone needs to FE it's human or NE, then Orc the UD. UD can one base the shit out of people, also their buildings are 'summoned' like Protoss. There's elements of all 3 SC races in War 3 and elements of War 3 races in SC2, to out and out say that UD = Zerg though is just wrong. | ||
|
abrasion
Australia722 Posts
| ||
| ||
