EPTOn June 23 2010 02:02 Ruthless wrote:
you can do a 128 round qualifier with some byes aswell
you can do a 128 round qualifier with some byes aswell
thats what me and saechiis are discussing now
Global Gamers SC2 Invitational - Page 22
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
JMS31207
United States292 Posts
thats what me and saechiis are discussing now | ||
|
DISHU
United Kingdom348 Posts
diamond protoss | ||
|
JMS31207
United States292 Posts
| ||
|
chekthehek
United States279 Posts
Battle.net ID: hekifson Approximate rank:diamond Race:zerg | ||
|
Anfere
Canada231 Posts
Rank: diamond Race: Zerg Great initiative, thumbs up to the organizers ! | ||
|
rS.Sinatra
Canada785 Posts
| ||
|
Saechiis
Netherlands4989 Posts
 | ||
|
T0fuuu
Australia2275 Posts
Am really excited to see this tourney | ||
|
rS.Sinatra
Canada785 Posts
On June 23 2010 05:44 Saechiis wrote: Yes, I think you mentioned that but we just decided to put up the TL account names. Will edit it for you though Oh my bad, I was just making sure because I won't be using this name when SC2 comes out ! :D Sorry for the confusion though. Thanks and I look forward to this for sure! | ||
|
Saechiis
Netherlands4989 Posts
 That leaves 2 more signup spots ... any ridiculously good players we're missing? | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
On June 23 2010 07:04 Saechiis wrote: Ret will be entering the qualifiers too, jaaay! That leaves 2 more signup spots ... any ridiculously good players we're missing? ME!! No, just kidding, I'm horrible. I guess you could get a few more players from the asian server into the qualifiers. If you can get a hold of them that is.  | ||
|
Saechiis
Netherlands4989 Posts
*voice inside my head saying "Yes we can, preciousss" * But no we can't, maybe next iteration | ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10305 Posts
making it more attractive for people to fight for those places instead of doing a wacky playstyle that pays off more then 2-3 place? ^_^ | ||
|
Wilko
Germany470 Posts
| ||
|
Saechiis
Netherlands4989 Posts
Don't worry though, this will be dealt with before the Tourney starts | ||
|
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
On June 23 2010 07:22 SmoKim wrote: Question: wouldn't it be better to use the $150 Pimpest Play for 1-2-3 place instead making it more attractive for people to fight for those places instead of doing a wacky playstyle that pays off more then 2-3 place? ^_^Coming in third guarantees you money, doing something wacky does not. Since there isn't any specific criteria for winning the pimpest plays, I expect players to aim rather for the top three positions than wasting their chances by doing something too wacky. And I don't forsee that the pimpest play will go to someone that does something "pimp" and then get demolished in the following battle (as an example). At least something pimp to me is someone doing something hard, cool, unusual that wins or get the player back into the game, not losing. | ||
|
Wilko
Germany470 Posts
On June 23 2010 07:04 Saechiis wrote: Ret will be entering the qualifiers too, jaaay! That leaves 2 more signup spots ... any ridiculously good players we're missing? What about Brat_OK? I'm sure roxkis can organize an US-Key for him, if he doesn't have one yet | ||
|
SmoKim
Denmark10305 Posts
On June 23 2010 07:25 Wilko wrote: The sponsor donated the prize money under the condition of putting it into the Pimpest Play Prize ah okay, thanks mate | ||
|
Saechiis
Netherlands4989 Posts
On June 23 2010 07:46 Wilko wrote: What about Brat_OK? I'm sure roxkis can organize an US-Key for him, if he doesn't have one yet I think we've already tried to get to him but I'm not sure ... Does he have a TL account? | ||
|
RyanRushia
United States2748 Posts
| ||
| ||
