• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:24
CEST 09:24
KST 16:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation5$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Earn Rewards for Every Prediction in the Game Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 628 users

[M](4) fenX Volcano

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
fenX
Profile Joined February 2011
France127 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-16 08:16:29
April 24 2011 11:10 GMT
#1
[image loading]

Introduction
Here is my new map that I will probably submit to next MotM and certainly use in my next monthly tournament after that.
What I wanted to do was a 4 players map with axis (not rotation) symetry, since I think it's more balanced, with the main not closed by map borders and the natural away from your oponent (like a 4 players desert oasis, but without the natural miles away from your ramp), and have a big non pathable center to create at least 2 attack paths (wich is the case for Metalopolis and Xelnaga caverns, for example, and those proven to be good maps with lots of strategic options and interesting games).
The result is a big map, because it's 4 players and with naturals away from oponent in every position it means extra space between mains and borders, with very long ground distances but short air and cliff distances, lots of attack path, a natural expansion quite safe from air and drops but open to 2 opposites attack paths by ground, and on the other hand a main safe by ground but vulnerable to drops and air (and eventually reapers/blink harass).
Also main has a second ramp with destructible rocks, but since they are easy to defend they are meant more as a way to break a contain or as a shortcut to your third (if you expand that way) than as a threat.

Map infos
- 4 players (1v1, 2v2, FFA, no spawn restriction)
- Bases : 14 blue
- 2 XNT
- Playable size : 158x163
- Available on EU

Overview
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Analyzer
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]


Aesthetics
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]


If you are on EU and want to play or discuss the map with me feel free to send me a message ingame : Fen.273
My map thread : http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=195518
WniO
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2706 Posts
April 27 2011 20:16 GMT
#2
hmm i really like this layout, reminds me of old blizzard bw maps. the aesthetics are nice but is it laggy?
Mereel
Profile Joined February 2010
Germany895 Posts
April 27 2011 20:21 GMT
#3
do i see tank shells on my mineralz?
TPW Mapmaking Team
fenX
Profile Joined February 2011
France127 Posts
April 27 2011 21:48 GMT
#4
On April 28 2011 05:16 WniO wrote:
hmm i really like this layout, reminds me of old blizzard bw maps. the aesthetics are nice but is it laggy?

hmmm on my old crapy PC it's a bit laggy on the north part near the small volcanos (settings on low), probably due to some flame or smoke doodads, rest of the map was fine for me, my roommate has a better PC and no lag (settings on ultra). I'd need more feedback about that to see if I need to remove some doodads or not.


On April 28 2011 05:21 Mereel wrote:
do i see tank shells on my mineralz?

Yeah, I was a bit concerned about that but I think it's not worse than Taldarim altar, only part of the mineral line is in range, you have to place your tank close to the cliff where they are easily sniped, and they don't help to set a contain.
If under siege on your main you can easily go for a counter and/or fall back to your natural.
Also it was my goal to have a vulnerable main and a safe natural with that layout.
Reapers and blink stalker are more dangerous than tanks here imho, but I'll try to test it against tanks.
My map thread : http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=195518
SidianTheBard
Profile Joined October 2010
United States2474 Posts
April 27 2011 23:30 GMT
#5
I really dislike the backdoor into the main, especially since it's closer to the enemy so therefore will be the main attack route. Not only is it a backdoor but it's right next to the main mineral line.

It seems it'll be too tough to take a 3rd because you will have to spread yourself across 1/2 the map.

Honestly I just wouldn't feel safe at all on this map, even though you say the natural is safe, it really isn't because both the paths to it are just so open. You'll be too busy bringing your army from your natural to the edges of your base and back again to defend. Also be careful that the watchtowers don't give any vision into the main otherwise warp in will completely destroy the map.

I could see getting rid of the 12 and 6 o clock bases and add thirds to each base right next to the natural but down the ramp, so you could still get a 3rd base much easier but you'd still have many attack paths you'd have to watch out for.
Creator of Abyssal Reef, Ascension to Aiur, Battle on the Boardwalk, Habitation Station, Honorgrounds, IPL Darkness Falls, King's Cove, Korhal Carnage Knockout & Moonlight Madness.
FlopTurnReaver
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Switzerland1980 Posts
April 28 2011 13:38 GMT
#6
The volcane is a really cool idea and looks awesome!!

But yeah, really looks like a pain to take a third.
Also + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat made Blistering Sands a terrible map!

BAACK DOOR BAACK DOOR!!
Check out @MapOfTheMonth on Twitter and under http://bit.ly/motmorg
virgol
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden61 Posts
April 28 2011 15:31 GMT
#7
Nice detail on the volcanoes. The only thing I'm a bit concerned about, is that the middle feels a bit clumped up.
fenX
Profile Joined February 2011
France127 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-07 23:38:05
May 07 2011 23:34 GMT
#8
Small update : moved the main mineral line 1 cell away from the cliff and added some trees on the low ground to prevent tanks and thors and colossi to get too close (small units can move between those trees but not big units), also added some textures (hope it won't bug the minimap or the loading screen, it happens to me sometimes with textures from different sets).

On April 28 2011 22:38 FlopTurnReaver wrote:
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat made Blistering Sands a terrible map!

BAACK DOOR BAACK DOOR!!

On blistering sands it was bad because it was shorter for the attacker to bounce between ramp and backdoor than for the defender, not the case here and ramp and backdoor are close enough to defend both, I don't think it will be too much of a problem and will just make it a bit harder for people to turtle on 1 base.
My map thread : http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=195518
WniO
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2706 Posts
May 08 2011 00:01 GMT
#9
this my favorite map so far in motm (: and why the hell cant i swim my zerglings in the lava?
adso
Profile Joined March 2011
718 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-08 00:16:52
May 08 2011 00:11 GMT
#10
On April 28 2011 05:16 WniO wrote:
hmm i really like this layout, reminds me of old blizzard bw maps.+ Show Spoiler +
the aesthetics are nice but is it laggy?

i felt exactly the same.. nostalgia is really a nice rush, merci fenX

On April 28 2011 22:38 FlopTurnReaver wrote:
The volcane is a really cool idea and looks awesome!!

But yeah, really looks like a pain to take a third.
Also + Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat made Blistering Sands a terrible map!

BAACK DOOR BAACK DOOR!!

What's with you and back doors ?

On May 08 2011 09:01 WniO wrote:
this my favorite map so far in motm (: and why the hell cant i swim my zerglings in the lava?

Make the larva use a derived lethal version of Mappove's swamps !!!!

i think 1v1 with 3/4 different spawn locations is the best layout to go for
(also the most difficult to pull off to everyone's taste/satisfaction)

good luck for motmt
fenX
Profile Joined February 2011
France127 Posts
May 13 2011 10:08 GMT
#11
So I got my scorecard and feedback from MotM for this map :

Yeah man, we had a hot and cool reaction to your map! Here are the average scores,

Balance: 4.8
Aesthetics: 8.0
Intangibles: 6.8

We loved the look, great theme and centerpiece, but balance is a big problem. First of all, you can seige the main's mineral line from the center, we tried. That's fixable but an issue.

The bigger issue is the Desert Oasis problem but extra complicated by the four-player factor. So in Desert Oasis you could go two ways around your main towards the center of the map, and even though it proved to have high spectator value, players HATED IT. Some loved it, but lots of hate. The natural is always a problem because it seems impossible to protect.

There may be a place for this style of map, and it certainly looks and feels fun, but we decided against it for competitive play.

Good luck on your next map!

-dimfish


On May 13 2011 09:47 monitor wrote:
Volcano – Sweet aesthetics! I’ve never seen a good use of Typhon and Tarsonis, really good. I like how the trees blend in well- although make sure not to overdo it. You might consider making some areas more rocky, instead of the whole thing being mostly trees. The manmade pathways leading from the main to natural isn’t my favorite, it looks weird and sort of out of place. Maybe make those patches of manmade, and include some patches of man-made cliffs?

My main concern is how forced and choked a lot of the paths are. The paths leading around the main are fairly wide, but have no options for troop movement. This will make maneuvering a 200/200 army quite impossible, and also make forcefields/Planetary Fortresses/siege tanks very powerful. However, I think this issue is sort of unavoidable with the main set-up you have now. In the future, definitely try to avoid this imbalance.

In vertical positions, the main to main distance is too short when you break the back door. Horizontal positions the pathways are to small to use nicely. Cross positions has a too long ground distance. It is really long- and the air distance is so much shorter, counter attacking will be quite hard.

I noticed the mains can be sieged from low ground. On maps like Shakuras Plateau, its not an issue because its easy to get to the tanks. Here however, the distance around your main is quite long, and will make early tank play very hard to deal with. Again, just something to avoid.


And I don't totally agree with all of this. Don't get me wrong, I respect the MotM staff's decision and analysis, but I don't think of balance the same way.
True, the main is siegeable, I reduced the impact it had on the first version but still made it possible, if I'm not mistaken you can't siege the gas geysers and main building, and one tank can only reach half of the mineral line. That would make tanks, thus terrans OP.
Now about the natural, the 2 entrances make it "impossible" or at least very hard to defend with only simcity, especially against zerg, Also the long distances and many attack paths make the speed zerglings the only good unit for counterattacks. Oh and also destructible rocks on the main, especially placed on the bottom of the ramp where more melee units can attack at once. All of this makes zeglings OP.
Now paths with chokes obviously makes the forcefield very strong, and the position of the main makes it easy to attack/cliff harass with blink stalkers and colossi. Then protoss is OP.
It's not that I didn't think about any of these points, but I thought that every race had an imbalance advantage and that overall they balanced each other.
It's more a "style imbalance" than a "race imbalance" maybe.

On the same mindset I run a monthly tournament on my maps, I know some of them are Z/T/P favored, but I think it's still OK as long as I get one map favored for each race and overall the mappool is still balanced (and it's BO3 or BO5). I think it's the case also for the current ladder mappool, some matchups on certain maps are not balanced but overall it's ok.

Also I play zerg and after all I'm a bit concern it may affect my perception of wich expand is safe or not and about the imbalances of the maps (even if I played random for a long time and know other races units and watch a lot of pro games of every matchup), for zerg the natural here is quite safe, just have to make one spinecrawler between the ramp and 2nd hatch and it covers pretty much what it needs to, the 2 entrances is not really a problem and I even feel it's safer than the natural on Xelnaga.

So what is your opinion, how do you think of balance ? Should every map be equaly balanced for every unit / playstyle (wich could lead to a "standard mapmaking" and leave few room for creativity) or is it ok to have imbalances as long as they more or less cancel each other ?
How does the race you play affect your mapmaking ?

PS : I'm glad people enjoyed the aesthetics on Volcano, I'm working on my next map and already spent 1 million hours on textures you can expect something cute too.
My map thread : http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=195518
Corak
Profile Joined February 2010
Germany187 Posts
May 13 2011 13:53 GMT
#12
Disclaimer: bias defending my own map
I think its good if there are some maps which demand other play styles.
As a Protoss player it feels hard that a forge FE is impossible on this map. But I don't think stuff like that is a real problem. And it is at the very least too early into SC2 to tell what BO-no-nos break a map and what are alright.
Some months ago the double natural of Terminus or the inbase natural of Crevasse would have seemed ridiculous, and maps like LT and Stepps of War seen not that much of a problem.
So it is at the very least right to experiment.

I don't like it that the main mins are siegeable. And it seems really hard to get a third in horizontal positions.
The long ways are a bit hard, but the backdoors help. (I shrank my map, to shorten the paths and now the vertical spawns are very aggressive and, as MotM pointed out, my paths are pretty thin.) I would like more of a main cliff to protecting the backdoor, like the main choke of LT is protected by the main cliff.
I don't think that colossus are that OP because of there speed. It will take ages for them to retreat if you just walk them into the enemy main. I think the warp in is the bigger bonus for toss on this map.
In the end only a ton of games will show if this map is balanced or not.
Is it ok if it is not? I think it depends heavily on: "how much?" A bit better for one race, np. But always a uphill battle - no.
And I think often a map is not specific imba for one race. But more like: Zerg has a strong and easy opening, then Terra has a strong mid game and Protoss gets crazy in the late game. (just as an example) This would lead to strategies with this strengths and weaknesses in mind and most of the time everything will be alright, if non of the 'imbalances' are too strong.
fenX
Profile Joined February 2011
France127 Posts
May 16 2011 08:40 GMT
#13
As zerg I feel quite safe taking a 3rd here, no matter what are the positions I can always expand away from my opponent and cover the attack paths by taking the XNT or with overlords on highgrounds or over the unpathable volcano.
It's interesting to see that it's the opposite feeling for other races both for the nat and 3rd (I could guess it for the nat since it's hard to wall off efficiently and impossible to do it fast enough, but didn't imagine it would feel unconfortable for the 3rd). That's what I was talking about with the race I play influencing my mapmaking.
And I agree with the problem of rush distances being either too long or too short, it's a difficult problem to deal with on 4p maps, I'm starting to think that the only good way to solve it is to have a layout similar to Shakuras plateau (with a restriction on close spawn and the 2 other spots roughly at the same distance).
My map thread : http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=195518
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 36m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JimRising 616
StarCraft: Brood War
TY 495
Leta 403
actioN 296
PianO 155
Noble 111
Larva 70
Zeus 49
Yoon 48
sSak 45
Sacsri 20
[ Show more ]
yabsab 10
Nal_rA 1
Dota 2
XaKoH 481
ODPixel240
XcaliburYe114
Fuzer 89
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K525
Other Games
summit1g7503
shahzam1191
monkeys_forever301
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick35020
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH376
• Hupsaiya 64
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• tankgirl 2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2112
League of Legends
• Lourlo1619
• Stunt473
• HappyZerGling91
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
2h 36m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
8h 36m
WardiTV European League
8h 36m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
16h 36m
RSL Revival
1d 2h
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
1d 5h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
OSC
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.