• Log InLog In
• Register

eri vs strelok zvt - Page 3

Post a Reply Prev 1 2 3 All

HappyManRun 1111 Posts December 09 2005 16:44 GMT #41 haha I was half hoping he would mass drop T's main with about 16 infesteds Anyways good one Eri, but your macro was horrible haha... idle drones everywhere :p Anyways, you inspired me to play ZvT instead of PvT, sounds way more fun to play :D

Chris307 3095 Posts December 18 2005 15:02 GMT #42 Queens fucking suck. I will go down with this ship twice if I have to.

Chris307 3095 Posts December 18 2005 15:04 GMT #43 The replay was highly entertaining however, I especially liked the part where you ensnared a group of vessels so they couldn't get to marines in time and scourged them. I can't imagine why two people in this thread have commented on how good your macro was though, I was weeping over it.

Liquid`Drone Norway28727 Posts December 18 2005 23:43 GMT #44 AND BECAUSE QUEENS ARE SO FUCKING AWESOME I STILL MANAGED TO WIN CONTEMPLATE THAT YOU NEWB

Chris307 3095 Posts December 19 2005 11:29 GMT #45 From what I saw, the Queens actually did very little to contribute to the win. With early attacks and the disabling of Strelok's first expansion, made possible by Dark Swarm, you put him out of his rhythm and made his inexperience show. Queens are about as useful in a game of Starcraft as a pair of sweaty balls are on The View.

Liquid`Drone Norway28727 Posts December 19 2005 22:48 GMT #46 .. I wouldn't have won the first decisive battle without ensnare and then I would never have gotten to pressure his expansion. that was the key point in the game. without ensnare he could have ran from the dark swarm and delayed my advance until he had vessels to irradiate my defilers with. apart from the first battle they're not necessary, they just make 12 marines seem like 8 and give my lurks some extra kills. meaning that if he has twice the necessary amount of rines they don't matter, but if he has barely enough then they do. you're just too stubborn and really not good enough to be stubborn. when ret says queens suck at least it means something cause he'd beat me more often than not tvz, even tho he's also ignorant of their effects.

Chris307 3095 Posts December 20 2005 15:28 GMT #47 I really don't think wisdom and practice correlate at all. I've been with the game atleast as long as you have, and my inability to be competitive at the top of the game back when I was 15 and still played to win games is irrelevant in this matter. You will win more battles with a Queen in play than you would with a few hundred of each resource dead in your stockpiles, that's granted. The real question for debate here is whether or not the resources spent on a Queen and Ensnare would've been better spent on other upgrades, on additional units, or on Hive tech.

RiSE United States3182 Posts December 31 2005 05:29 GMT #48 neat randomination =]

metaxa Lithuania30 Posts January 04 2006 04:05 GMT #49 omg, ensnare+lurks was gorgeous!..

Prev 1 2 3 All

Please log in or register to reply.