EPTIn my world, it's a must buy.
Without MM, I'd maybe pass, but MM will actually take the frustration out of BW, that feeling of getting stomped for a while, until you can get an occasional win.
Do you plan on trying BW:Remastered when it comes out? - P…
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
niteReloaded
Croatia5282 Posts
In my world, it's a must buy. Without MM, I'd maybe pass, but MM will actually take the frustration out of BW, that feeling of getting stomped for a while, until you can get an occasional win. | ||
|
Nyarly
France1030 Posts
Do you plan on trying BW:Remastered when it comes out? : Yes (4142) 63% No (1217) 19% Maybe (1190) 18% I don't know, can you repeat the question? | ||
|
SinO[Ob]
France898 Posts
| ||
|
lastride
2390 Posts
| ||
|
TT1
Canada10045 Posts
| ||
|
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
| ||
|
Corvuuss
Austria354 Posts
On June 28 2017 19:21 Ancestral wrote: Would have hoped to have seen Linux support, but since I think their target market is SK, that's too much to ask. More and more big titles coming out for Linux but Blizzard nowhere to be seen. As blizzard is a company my reason for this would be: Too much work for not enough return | ||
|
Clbull
United Kingdom1439 Posts
| ||
|
Popparockz
United States40 Posts
On May 06 2017 18:45 Creager wrote: I'm down, but if they somehow decide to charge more than 20 bucks for this I'm not gonna buy it (ok, who am I kidding, I probably still would at some point, but not without swaying fists accompanied by lots of hate). It is 15 dollars. | ||
|
ShuriKn
Canada20 Posts
On June 28 2017 12:03 TT1 wrote: ill play it w/ the old graphics xD do you dislike the new graphics or prefer the classic one? | ||
|
TT1
Canada10045 Posts
On July 02 2017 12:46 ShuriKn wrote: it's about time! do you dislike the new graphics or prefer the classic one? prefer the classic one, ill try the new graphics out of curiosity but i'd rather play on 4:3 anyways. better minimap positioning and mouse movement (even tho i know widescreen has more map vision). | ||
|
KungKras
Sweden484 Posts
| ||
|
pzea469
United States1520 Posts
There is nothing about this that aims to attract new players. Same limited mechanics from BW that will scare away any new kid who gives it a try. Like many, I used to think those limitations were what made the game what it was, but I now believe it is really just holding it back. | ||
|
Fatam
1986 Posts
On June 21 2017 06:59 niteReloaded wrote: Matchmaking will be the deciding factor for me. In my world, it's a must buy. Without MM, I'd maybe pass, but MM will actually take the frustration out of BW, that feeling of getting stomped for a while, until you can get an occasional win. Yeah that is 100% the only reason I will buy as well. | ||
|
iopq
United States1126 Posts
| ||
|
Yiome
China1687 Posts
Would probably pick it up later (on a sale maybe) for the campaign | ||
|
KameZerg
Sweden1772 Posts
On April 29 2017 07:35 ninazerg wrote: Couple of things: First, StarCraft is already playable, so why would I play money to play a game that I can already play? Sure, the graphics are re-done, but it's the same game overall. I've always liked the StarCraft: Brood War graphics, so while I'm not against updating the graphics, I'd be fine without that. Second, Blizzard, as of late, has had a track record of releasing incomplete or buggy products. Or D3. Just for the 1.18 patch, they had a myriad of problems in the test realm, and that version was patched several times and the thing still needs fixing. I would be hesitant to purchase a product from a company that has a reputation for doing shoddy work. I agree, SC:R is literally worse than 1.16 | ||
|
QueenOfLegion
Malaysia15 Posts
| ||
|
WeddingEpisode
United States356 Posts
| ||
|
pebble444
Italy2503 Posts
| ||
| ||
