On January 19 2007 02:04 jkillashark wrote:
/me nods head vehemently in agreement.
/me nods head vehemently in agreement.
Holy crap you used the word "vehemently" now I love you more.
Forum Index > News |
iNcontroL
![]()
USA29055 Posts
On January 19 2007 02:04 jkillashark wrote: Show nested quote + On January 18 2007 21:52 Manifesto7 wrote: FINALLY. FORTY FIVE OF THE LONGEST DAYS OF MY LIFE! As for the HW threads, skyglow is absolutely right. It is an excuse to act immature and foolish, because that never happens anywhere else on this board. /me nods head vehemently in agreement. Holy crap you used the word "vehemently" now I love you more. | ||
Figurehead
Poland31 Posts
On January 19 2007 01:49 InsanitY wrote: i love the comment on the savior-card "only a zerg, only a zerg" ^^v "When I logged in and witnessed the word 'Ma-Jae-Yoon', I felt as if Mount Everest was erected in front of me." Child | ||
![]()
Beyonder
![]()
Netherlands15103 Posts
| ||
Gokey
United States2722 Posts
| ||
![]()
Mynock
4492 Posts
I don't even understand it anymore. Not a tiniest bit. Do you guys just need threads as an excuse to spam and act immature? Maybe we should make a subforum for that then? ![]() Nyovne too, why? ![]() -Mynock | ||
![]()
Hot_Bid
Braavos36375 Posts
the "triumphs" part, all six links are clearly not the good kind of HW thread, none i list are the "borderline" cases that are being contested so hotly i certainly didn't mean to create the poll as a way to "pump up" the pro crusade crowd, i was legitimately being honest in asking for a response, and if enough people said no (doesn't have to be a majority) i would call for an end to it. i don't think it comes off the way you say it does, i think you and skyglow are as biased against the crusade as some people are for it. | ||
Vin{MBL}
5185 Posts
![]() | ||
![]()
Hot_Bid
Braavos36375 Posts
lastly how are the questions biased? please give me examples of "unbiased" questions? | ||
Pressure
7326 Posts
[02:06] [dronebabo] how old are you [02:06] [i845] 13 [02:06] [dronebabo] are you interested in girls yet [02:06] [dronebabo] i got porn HELL NO | ||
![]()
Mynock
4492 Posts
And yes I'm irritated by this movement because it's everywhere. It's not confined to special threads that I can choose to ignore, but permeates the whole forum. And ruins certain threads I'd like to read. It's not isolated, it's an attitude. That makes it a whole notch worse than a couple threads you can easily ignore if you're not interested. I never see you posting in any political threads, yet I don't see you complaining either. Admit that you're having major fun with this whole crusade idea, and won't let easily go of it. And finally, how about we just treat those thread like any others, and close them if they suck, leave them to their fate if they don't? Why this distinction in the first place? It's all utterly unnecessary, let alone now that we see the negative effects of the other side of it as well. -Mynock | ||
![]()
Mynock
4492 Posts
On January 19 2007 14:13 Hot_Bid wrote: also, while some people use the crusade as a way to act immature and flame, i would be 100% behind faster moderator involvement regarding closing HW threads. the only reason the crusade was started was because mods couldn't close fast enough, not because i want to post random shit in a topic. lastly how are the questions biased? please give me examples of "unbiased" questions? "would be 100% behind faster moderator involvement regarding closing HW threads." Yeah exactly. Not behind the closing of stupid threads. Behind the closing of HW threads. Regardless. We're perfectly clear on your point. -Mynock | ||
![]()
Hot_Bid
Braavos36375 Posts
also, about the alleged "bias" of the poll, two "yes" options imo are better for your argument than mine. the two "yes" options were for "should HW threads exist"? so i don't understand, if anything two "yes" options to "should HW threads exist" is biased FOR the existence of HW threads... and i already stated, if mods close the threads faster, there's no reason for the crusade to exist. i don't know where you got the "won't easily let go of it" because i haven't even posted flames or spam in the last like 5 crusades (some of which were incorrectly targeting legit HW threads). | ||
![]()
Hot_Bid
Braavos36375 Posts
the poll results show that there is a significant portion of the population that doesn't like the crusade, (something like 36% "negative" and 10% "neutral") so in the next scoop i was planning to call off the whole thing. i just don't like how you make all these assumptions about my motivations and such when all i'm trying to do with CleaR, LiquiScoop, etc, is to improve the General Forum through effort in posting. it's kind of frustrating when all you do is make sarcastic comments and personal attacks when we're all on the same side here. i think its good that we care and that we try. i will, as i planned, call it off in the next scoop. sometimes ideas with good intentions run away and don't work out the way you planned them, but that's no reason to assume things about me personally. when the crusade is called off in the next LS, i urge faster mod closing of bad hw threads. "bad" as in very clear that its last minute lazy answer begging. i am disappointed that you went to the personal attacks/assumptions immediately about this, and that your tone is really condescending. | ||
![]()
Mynock
4492 Posts
I didn't mean to sound that way, but again I did. I was merely feeling that way because just a couple days ago you wanted closing rights exclusively for HW threads, and then this current issue of LS also featured "triumphs" etc. And yes, the whole "crusade" thing also ticked me off. And since other staff (Mani, ETT, JKS, others...) also expressed their concerns about it I felt you were being thickheaded. Hence the assumptions. But I never actually meant to assume that you were purely doing it for your personal enjoyment and not with good intentions for the side. Sry again ![]() PS.: Good job calling it off after all. Let the mods do their jobs. PPS: Surprised no one mentioned it yet, but that Garimto pic startled the shit outta me. -Mynock | ||
![]()
Hot_Bid
Braavos36375 Posts
| ||
SonuvBob
Aiur21549 Posts
On January 19 2007 16:16 Hot_Bid wrote: no problem mynock, i never had a problem with you in the past, just a case of misunderstanding. Does this mean there isn't going to be a Mynock/Hot_Bid steel cage deathmatch? ![]() | ||
![]()
thedeadhaji
![]()
39489 Posts
At least read the content of the post and think twice what you're posting before you do so... all too often I see a borderline op post get the full treatment --;; By the way I believe this motion to stop bad homework threads has helped though, since if you look back to before all of this started, and compare it to the situation now, you would see that statistically there are less homework threads, and the ones that do pop up are generally of much higher quality. Before, I dont think there were even very many "borderline" op posts. There were very good posts, ones which I had absolutely no clue how to answer (WiP and a one or more posters come to mind. shit your math is way beyond me --; ![]() In any case if everyone keeps Mani's mantra of "Making a thread should be an effort by the poster", then I am sure things would be much cleaner. I asked for some help / suggestions about PP and my broodwar situation, and I tried hard to make it worth while to readers and explain the situation throuroughly. I hope I did at least a decent job at that. A lot of my posts are shitty, but I hope most of the threads I start are at least of acceptable quality. Thanks for reading, I guess :O | ||
BuGzlToOnl
United States5918 Posts
![]() | ||
skyglow1
New Zealand3962 Posts
The sad thing is that there will still be many who spam without first noticing I put effort in the post, just that its in a spoiler. In fact, I think I am going to do it and see how it works out before the crusade is called off in the next LS. I've been studying alot and some stuff I don't understand too T_T | ||
![]()
Hot_Bid
Braavos36375 Posts
On January 20 2007 01:14 skyglow1 wrote: I should purposely make a "HW" thread on a genuine question, puts lots of effort into it, but place everything into a spoiler and attempt to make the non-spoiler material look messy, lacking in effort and retarded. The sad thing is that there will still be many who spam without first noticing I put effort in the post, just that its in a spoiler. In fact, I think I am going to do it and see how it works out before the crusade is called off in the next LS. I've been studying alot and some stuff I don't understand too T_T this is a stupid idea and i don't understand how this would prove anything | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Dota 2![]() ![]() EffOrt ![]() Barracks ![]() Larva ![]() Stork ![]() BeSt ![]() Nal_rA ![]() firebathero ![]() Soulkey ![]() Dewaltoss ![]() [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • HeavenSC StarCraft: Brood War![]() • StrangeGG ![]() • Legendk ![]() ![]() • Kozan • Migwel ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • sooper7s • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike |
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Wardi Open
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV European League
Online Event
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|