EPT[GSL] Code S S1 - RO32 Day Two - Page 5
| Forum Index > News |
|
ComusLoM
Norway3547 Posts
| ||
|
Master_Blaster
United Kingdom269 Posts
I still think MC and Leenock will advance. | ||
|
Yaki
France4234 Posts
| ||
|
DanielSe
Germany38 Posts
Fin > Leenock MC > Supernova Leenock > Supernova Fin > MC Leenock < MC | ||
|
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
On January 10 2012 17:11 DanielSe wrote: I think Fin > Leenock MC > Supernova Leenock > Supernova Fin > MC Leenock < MC Wow my predictions are like a reversal of yours Forgg < Leenock MC < Supernova Leenock > Supernova Forgg > MC Forgg > Supernova | ||
|
MVTaylor
United Kingdom2893 Posts
Leenock was top 8 of GSL November so in tier 1 while fin had so little GSL points for the year he was in tier 4. (MC was in tier 2 based on his GSL 2011 points, Supoernova Tier 3) Of the 8 players in each tier one was randomly picked by drawing names or whatever to go in to each group, the player from tier 1 would play the player from tier 4, Leenock just happened to get fin, he in no way "chose" to play him. It's only the round of sixteen where group nominations occur. http://www.gomtv.net/2012gsls1/news/66780 | ||
|
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
On January 10 2012 17:24 mvtaylor wrote: People do know Leenock didn't "choose" fin don't they? Leenock was top 8 of GSL November so in tier 1 while fin had so little GSL points for the year he was in tier 4. (MC was in tier 2 based on his GSL 2011 points, Supoernova Tier 3) Of the 8 players in each tier one was randomly picked by drawing names or whatever to go in to each group, the player from tier 1 would play the player from tier 4, Leenock just happened to get fin, he in no way "chose" to play him. It's only the round of sixteen where group nominations occur. http://www.gomtv.net/2012gsls1/news/66780 I believe that the winner and runner-up of GSL November got to pick the first person in their group. | ||
|
LanZ
35 Posts
All in all, I want him to play on friggin' CLOUD KINGDOM. Props to Superouman as well!  | ||
|
B.I.G.
3251 Posts
| ||
|
Master_Blaster
United Kingdom269 Posts
On January 10 2012 17:23 Subversive wrote: Wow my predictions are like a reversal of yours Forgg < Leenock MC < Supernova Leenock > Supernova Forgg > MC Forgg > Supernova ForGG doesn't have better tvz than Jjakji, not by a mile. Unless for a really creative all in cheese i don't think Leenock will lose. ForGG over MC? You must be kidding. MC gives chills to MVP when they play and you think Forgg has a chance over a veteran like MC? I like ForGG but don't think of him of a never before seen genius. He has first to fall to really rise. | ||
|
MVTaylor
United Kingdom2893 Posts
On January 10 2012 17:25 Subversive wrote: I believe that the winner and runner-up of GSL November got to pick the first person in their group. I stand corrected! | ||
|
DreamOen
Spain1400 Posts
| ||
|
FuRong
New Zealand3089 Posts
| ||
|
deadmau
960 Posts
| ||
|
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
On January 10 2012 17:26 Master_Blaster wrote: ForGG doesn't have better tvz than Jjakji, not by a mile. Unless for a really creative all in cheese i don't think Leenock will lose. ForGG over MC? You must be kidding. MC gives chills to MVP when they play and you think Forgg has a change to a veteran like MC? I like ForGG but don't think of him of a never before seen genius. He has first to fall to really rise. Well as I predict that Forgg loses to Leenock, I'm not sure what the first part of your post is referencing. As for your bias love of MC, you talk like MC has just won his second GSL and Forgg is some scrub sacrifice. Forgg smashed Sage and Tassadar. It's not unreasonable to believe he could beat MC. | ||
|
Master_Blaster
United Kingdom269 Posts
On January 10 2012 17:32 Subversive wrote: Well as I predict that Forgg loses to Leenock, I'm not sure what the first part of your post is referencing. As for your bias love of MC, you talk like MC has just won his second GSL and Forgg is some scrub sacrifice. Forgg smashed Sage and Tassadar. It's not unreasonable to believe he could beat MC. Sorry about Leenock, saw different. So I need to be a biased fan of MC to tell a fact like that? You are a ForGG biased fan that thinks he can just come and win a GSL from the first try like he is joining a retarded tournament. | ||
|
deadmau
960 Posts
| ||
|
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
On January 10 2012 17:32 Subversive wrote: Well as I predict that Forgg loses to Leenock, I'm not sure what the first part of your post is referencing. As for your bias love of MC, you talk like MC has just won his second GSL and Forgg is some scrub sacrifice. Forgg smashed Sage and Tassadar. It's not unreasonable to believe he could beat MC. Again: Sage lost to an undefended proxy rax and to a timing attack after mass zealots vs marauders, not exactly the most proving matches in my book; he also is not at MC's level. | ||
|
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
On January 10 2012 17:35 Master_Blaster wrote: Sorry about Leenock, saw different. So I need to be a biased fan of MC to tell a fact like that? You are a ForGG biased fan that thinks he can just come and win a GSL from the first try like he is joining a retarded tournament. Yeah the difference is, when I quoted the guy above me, I didn't act incredulous about his choices like he was an idiot. | ||
|
droppanda
Australia176 Posts
Leenock vs forgg? Forgg still has to prove himself, his run in code A was great but until we can see more of his pay in the GSL, its too early to tell. Personally from what I saw, there were a few games in that run where the losers lost the game, rather than forgg winning them. Leenock is good, there is no doubt about it. Zergs usually have a hard time against terran, and i would comfortably put money on Forgg to win if it were almost any other zerg, but against leenock, no way. He always puts up an incredible fight against terrans. | ||
| ||
