[LP] To Edit is to Care - Page 6

107 Comments Post a Reply

Prev 1 4 5 6 All

greenbastard

Sweden1 Post

August 09 2011 18:10 GMT

#101

Liquipedia is great, however LP makes me and always will make think about liquidpoker... =)

blahz0r

3030 Posts

August 09 2011 19:21 GMT

#102

A contribution is a contribution no matter how big or small. Even the effort put in to want to edit something is a step towards contributing. Most if not everyone will be hesitant on their first few edits, I know I was. My advice to overcoming this fear is do a few small edits and build up your confidence, experience, and knowledge of LP. Again any contribution helps, no matter how big or small.

Thanks to all the people who have worked on LP making it what it is today. Especially to those on IRC/talk pages who have helped me out.
I got a mention woot woot

ArchDC

Malaysia1996 Posts

August 09 2011 20:02 GMT

#103

Nice job guys!!

Emporio

United States3069 Posts

August 09 2011 21:34 GMT

#104

My concern with contributing to liquipedia is that I'm not really sure what I can do that would be useful. Maybe I could add trivia about progamers I know fairly well, but is that really important?

Also, I would maybe think about adding BO's but I'm in plat and I don't really feel qualified to be putting up information that while maybe accurate, I don't necessarily understand correctly. If there was some way that I could do the framwork and build up the meat of articles, but know that there would definitely be someone that would check, correct, and verify what I did and do so in a relatively timely manner so I don't forget, or liquipedia doesn't end up with a crappy guide that hasn't been confirmed, then I would feel much more comfortable doing that.

Aesop

Hungary11304 Posts

August 09 2011 22:05 GMT

#105

On August 10 2011 06:34 Emporio wrote:
My concern with contributing to liquipedia is that I'm not really sure what I can do that would be useful. Maybe I could add trivia about progamers I know fairly well, but is that really important?

Also, I would maybe think about adding BO's but I'm in plat and I don't really feel qualified to be putting up information that while maybe accurate, I don't necessarily understand correctly. If there was some way that I could do the framwork and build up the meat of articles, but know that there would definitely be someone that would check, correct, and verify what I did and do so in a relatively timely manner so I don't forget, or liquipedia doesn't end up with a crappy guide that hasn't been confirmed, then I would feel much more comfortable doing that.

ad 1: More info on players is always appreciated.

ad 2: As zatic said in the other thread, porting to Liquipedia what already exists would be a great help to start with. If we had all the good guides on these forums (and I think those stick out sufficiently) over there, we would be a step further already. They need some adaptation to wiki style and layout, but that doesn't require you to be very creative.