Mafia VIII [GG]
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On May 15 2009 13:42 dreamflower wrote: I guess I always assumed that people who announced they were running for office before roles came out weren't being entirely serious to begin with. More like what Caller was doing with his troll post. Thanks for all the explanations. Some posts are trolling but you usually get 1-2 serious runnings as well | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
I know the game doesnt officially start till friday but guess what! That doesn't stop the bloodyc0bbler platform wooooooooooooo. Ok guys, this game will be the hardest one potentially we have ever done, as such we need to get the mafia as soon as this game starts. I've shown a record of insane amount of clue analyzing from previous games, as such I believe I would make a good candidate for the town to keep alive. I however, would prefer to be pardoner, this allows me to help prevent potentially townbreaking lynches. As mayor, I would analyze the clues (as this is my forte) and bring them to your attention and direct votes on the best possible suspects, thus bringing the town some central leadership to avoid chaos. As pardoner, I would do generally the same idea, however, would use my ability to prevent lynches on cases where it appeared someone with no links was up for no reason. Vote for order, vote for BloodyC0bbler | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
And I really hope people know when to pause in this game when accuded of bandwagoning stupidly. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
In a vet game, It's no longer a game of rush for mayor for a) bg protection (although nice perk) b) its placing yourself where you think your strengths would be best. I don't think the mayor spot would be done justice by me. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
Realistically though, I figure you at serious level of playing as a mayor would outdo mine, or a pardoner level would be my better strongsuit. If plexa, cam, or mtf would like a slot in the mayoral/pardoner I would be more than happy to let them get it. I honestly believe a behavioural analyzer and a clue analyzer should be mayor/pardoner, it gives town potentially two of their best people protected from mafia hits. As mafia will undoubtedly hit players who are known for organizing town in some way. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
Ver Mynock Showtime Caller Myself and myself running two of us would prefer pardoner, the other 3 either or. Ver has an early lead, which would most likely be due to his playstyle, caller has one vote from ver, and showtime with nothing. Mynock has a few votes, i have nothing. This leaves Ver and Mynock atm as the two who stand to be elected and showtime! in this case, have said, they are running off a strength behavioural analysis, which although is a good strength, both elected officials based off the same skills are not entirely useful. Let alone the fact they, in the past have preferred to sit in inner circles than speak openly, which is a horrible way to do things. now, as of the last game I played in, I was sheriff. As the primary elect that game, I did what I will do this game, Openly analyze clues, and link the best possible people for the night posts given. This requires me to me in the public eye of the town at all times, which is what is needed in the elected roles. Also, before voting for showtime or mynock, please consider the game of mine that just recently ended. The only behavioural analyzers out in force were for the red side, and the town completely to dry in that area, however, town had an amazing clue analyzer (although he was ignored) which could have changed the game entirely. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
Also, mafia killing one of their own then claiming vigi, is not in their best interests, as it puts them on the radar for further clue analysis meaning if we see another clue as obvious pointing at them, its game over. And the GF faking it would be a huge loss to their team. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On May 17 2009 03:03 dreamflower wrote: @BC: That's true; I hadn't thought about the clue analysis part. I only mentioned the vigilante aspect because I remember some plans involving confirming vigilantes floating around in previous games. god, chuiu's last game was retarded for the vig talk, it was over discussed and seriously counter productive. Vigi's get confirmed via kills yes, and works a crapload better if you can analyze your own hit. and provided your not a prime suspect already you can normally slide under the radar. As a general note, as this was a rule brought about in chuiu's last game. Elected roles cannot be proven, remember even more closely whos being put in there. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On May 17 2009 13:46 L wrote: I would say that we should vote him in. Feel free to look at the actual benefits of office. They are limited to not being killed and fucking the town over. We have a number of very good players that can clue analyze and I'm certain they will be getting medic protection. Also, I seriously want people to go read mafia 2's section on this after checking out who was mafia. Clue analyzers almost never get the protection they deserve, i honestly dunno where you got that idea. As for this nemy debacle. If he is a DT, he would be useful, but if hes this retarded dumb to get caught already by mafia, he wont last long to use his abilities, and as a mayor we can never prove hes legit regardless of his role. If hes elected and DT the mafia/traitor will convince people hes red and get him lynched and if hes red, town will have wasted their elected role and have to pin him and get him lynched. Even if he is a DT, at this point his usefulness wont last long due to his compromised role. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
Although that leads the game into more finger pointing and chaos, which the style nemy seems to be playing is building. Very few roles would benefit from town chaos. | ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
| ||
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
On May 17 2009 14:55 nemY wrote: I think plenty of nice/mean things about you as well but you don't see me saying them everywhere... anyways, can we move back to the mayor candidates? I have told people multiple times, PM discussion is lame, its never reliable evidence, and leaves you too many holes on being caught. Hense, participating in them is not a bright move. | ||
| ||