TL Mafia 3 [Night 5] - Page 2

On November 03 2008 01:30 Caller wrote:
Couldn't we start by say ordering all current suspects to vote on x person and all others to vote on y person? All deviants could then be lynched, etc. Then we have a dt check x list (or all of them) and one of them posts DT says so-and-so? at which point we see if mafia kills him/her that night and if they don't then we get dt to role-check somebody (like me) and see if they confirm the role or not? And if they role-check mafia, well, free lynch lol.
On the other hand if the DT is a fake they'll either reveal themselves really easily or end up sacrificing a mafia to keep the illusion alive for one more turn.

On November 03 2008 01:10 Plexa wrote:
I think lynching the DT is best.. but we do it like this
Day 1 - person speaks up, orders people to vote in places; DT checks him but doesn't speak up
Day 2 - person orders a second list of hits; DT checks a list an gets number of mafia
Day 3 - DT speaks up, posts all his information and gets lynched

Thus the DT has used his two most useful abilities already and is no longer a liability to the town. Knowing a DT is alive and having to protect him every night is a pain in the ass (see Empyrean from last game) especially seeing that the suicide bomber will likely get him. Thus we remove a liability from our side (keeping everything more secret in terms of medics) as well as verifying a leader - who is also a liability (can't have two liabilities am i right?). Also because the lynch lists were ordered, we can easily check lists and find out where the mafia are.

Also, if we lynch the person instead of the DT then mafia can just fake-role claim DT and we lose a jack or a veteran. AND we have the possibility of the mafia confusing things when DTs are saying opposing things. Lynching the DT is the only way to be sure.

On November 03 2008 01:36 Amber[LighT] wrote:
I'm still not following on why we are planning to lynch our own DT's after 3 days. It's not making too much sense at the moment. Why not just keep them alive as long as possible if they get sufficient information. If they get killed then so what, their information will be very helpful either way. I'm going to give your plan another read Ace and we can try it out for a couple of days, but I would rather not lynch someone who's helping us.

On November 03 2008 01:51 HeRoS)Pink wrote:
I don't get why we are lynching an inactive townie on day 1, I mean most of the blues won't post much in order to stay alive and use their power at least one time. Since there's no mayor I don't think any DT will try analyzing clues risking to be killed by mafia on night 1, it would be a total waste of a DT. I can only imaging Vet or townies analyzing clues or even mafia.

Well that's only my opinion

On November 03 2008 02:26 Empyrean wrote:
My plan is much the same as the Mandalor plan of last game, which is to have two groups of people vote for the two top suspects. We'll have this go on for a few days, while the detectives take turns alternating checking the lists while the last detective checks one at random each night. After, say, four lynch votes, the detectives will reveal their list of how many mafia voted for each candidate, and we can use simple math from there. At this point, the two original DTs reveal their lists (and will likely be killed) while the third just waits.

If any mafia decide to claim DT and give a conflicting view, the third DT will speak up. He'll likely get killed the next night as well. But still, once all the detectives are dead, we will have six-eight Mandalor style lists, as well as the names of any mafia who roleclaimed DT (since the DTs are dead, anyone who gave conflicting information by roleclaming DT will logically be mafia).

On November 03 2008 02:26 fusionsdf wrote:


boy there were like 25 nights, so that would take a looong time to go through.

But for instance when naruto vigid, he left clues behind that day post saying things like "the victim was animated" or something like that


I think plexa probably remember most of these better than I do

On November 03 2008 16:43 fanatacist wrote:
Also, how about getting another DT to check up on Folca? I don't think I can vote for anyone until I have a double-verification of some sort. Wouldn't it seem likely for a Mafia to get rid of an active with strong analysis like Ace? I mean, I guess this is why we would be killing Folca too, but is it worth the loss of Ace?

On November 03 2008 10:28 MTF wrote:
Ugh, sorry guys. Short version of today is that my internet went down. (long story involves a loose hamster chewing through internet cables)

Anyway, I haven't had time to read through the thread yet, but here's my assessment on the clues so far. Keep in mind that all of these connections are going to be weak, as we're just starting here.


MidnightGladius:

Profile Quote: "It's time to acknowledge the inevitable. Stifle your pride and embrace the glory of change."


Clues:
+ Show Spoiler +

On November 04 2008 01:16 Bockit wrote:
Ok, finally caught up with a majority of posts.

I think there are two options right now.

1)Lynch Folca.

This gives us so much information it's ridiculous. If he comes up as a detective we know Ace is mafia and we stop a mafia scheme, all the stuff Folca has been saying is good about how he found Ace out etc. If he pops red then while still unsure about Ace's allegiance we just killed a mafia and stopped a scheme.

2)Lynch based on clues and see what mafia do tonight.

If they kill him, well, yeah. If they don't, we get more info from him and then lynch him to see if he's dt or not.

Not sure which I would go for atm. Probably 1.