|
On February 17 2008 07:50 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On February 17 2008 07:47 Amber[LighT] wrote:
Wait a sec. Maybe that 'doctor' we are suspecting is a vigilante? We're not told if those two people who used the serum were necessarily mafia right? Maybe Dr. Dragoon is a vigilante. The question is should he be lynched or should we keep him around? can't be first night =/= vigilante Exactly
On February 09 2008 12:55 Chuiu wrote:
Vigilante - You have the ability to kill 2 people of your choice at any night phase in the game. You don't have to use both at once. But be careful, because a clue will be left behind that points to you for the mafia (or the town) to interpret. You must wait until the second night of the game to act, however.
|
On February 17 2008 08:59 CDRdude wrote:
Crap, I need to catch up on 10 pages of this, I've been doing other stuff. Any compelling conclusions? Everyone wants to lynch Dr.Dragoon, people think that the line in the day post
A little more than a few hours later kAra was tossing in his sleep, artofmagic heard him from the next room and came in to see what was wrong.
points to Nightmare, and apparently the mafia stuffed his "prey" into a sleeping bag which points to me since my name is a misspelling of a bird of prey. Also because the mafia threw a body out the window and Falcon's swoop or something. Double lynch is in effect so you can vote for two people.
Edit; also since we can vote for two people I'll cast my extra vote for Dr.Dragoon.
|
On February 17 2008 09:59 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:
Wait can you use both votes on the same person? I don't believe so.
|
bah sorry Chuiu for changing my vote again (or for the first time...I'm actually not sure), but this time it's final.
I vote for Dr.Dragoon and Notsorry
|
A little more than a few hours later kAra was tossing in his sleep, artofmagic heard him from the next room and came in to see what was wrong. People think that part relates to a...nightmare. The only reason I give you the benefit of the doubt is because I've realized how the way some of these sentences are worded can be misleading.
|
Yeah, I seriously didn't want Nightmare to die. Dragoon however...despite the fact that he was a townie I have to say we might be better off without him in the long run.
|
Also
On February 17 2008 14:30 Chuiu wrote:
one yelling and screaming for his life and bitter to the end, the other quiet and confused.
ROFL can anyone guess which one's which?
|
Another thing I'd like to mention is that Dragoon and Nightmare's deaths pretty much prove now that we're interpreting clues the wrong way. I mean the clues leading to nightmare we're pretty vague, but that whole syringe thing with Dr.Dragoon seemed dead on and yet we were wrong.
|
On February 17 2008 14:48 ulszz wrote:Lol, well we got owned. At least I can say I didn't vote for either of them  . Well, I originally voted for Dr. Dragoon but I changed it. It seems like the only real evidence we have at the moment is pointing towards NotSorry. I guess we will have to wait and see what tonight brings us though. edit-added The only evidence on NotSorry that I've seen anyone post is based off of clue interpretations, and after Dragoon and Nightmare's death I don't really hold any interpretations in very high regard anymore.
|
Yeah, if the next clues are too vague I say we just kill the people who aren't posting.
|
On February 18 2008 05:33 Fishball wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2008 04:34 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:On February 18 2008 04:31 ZaplinG wrote:On February 18 2008 03:32 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:
I'm a bit confused by this. I can't look into Dragoon's head and see why he sent me that PM.
Maybe he was trying to get me to "admit" I'm Mafia.
Maybe he just wanted to see how I'd react.
Maybe he's just an idiot.
In this case, I was just the messenger boy. Hell, I didn't even vote to lynch Dragoon because I came to realized that it was probably just a stupid move on his part that he didn't think through. Or maybe you didn't vote for him because he already had enough votes and you didn't want to raise more suspicion on yourself. Or maybe that's not the reason at all? No point playing the game of words. Lets just lynch you and we'll find out, right or wrong  Well after getting 3 lynches wrong, if we make 2 more random lynchings that'll give us like...an 80% chance of hitting mafia.
/noobstatistics
|
On February 18 2008 12:04 demonic_phate wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2008 11:59 Cambium wrote:On February 18 2008 10:47 rpf wrote:On February 18 2008 10:26 Yogurt wrote:On February 18 2008 09:46 rpf wrote:
Actually it says "a educated;" oh, the irony. i dont get it MAFIA? Any word beginning with a vowel following the article "a" means the article "a" becomes "an." Dude, this isn't even true -_____-;; Here's a counter-example: A unit So your suggesting that whether or not you add an "n" to a if it proceeds certain words is totally random? As with most grammatical rules in english, there are exceptions EDIT: Damnit rpf beat me to it  I think it has to deal with pronounciation then the actual fact of whether or not the vowel is in front. In the case of unit, you pronounce it as yunit, not oonit, if it was the later then there would be an "an" in front since it's a vowel sound in front.
and why the fuck are we talking about grammar in a mafia game?
|
On February 18 2008 12:11 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2008 12:09 Falcynn wrote:On February 18 2008 12:04 demonic_phate wrote:On February 18 2008 11:59 Cambium wrote:On February 18 2008 10:47 rpf wrote:On February 18 2008 10:26 Yogurt wrote:On February 18 2008 09:46 rpf wrote:
Actually it says "a educated;" oh, the irony. i dont get it MAFIA? Any word beginning with a vowel following the article "a" means the article "a" becomes "an." Dude, this isn't even true -_____-;; Here's a counter-example: A unit So your suggesting that whether or not you add an "n" to a if it proceeds certain words is totally random? As with most grammatical rules in english, there are exceptions EDIT: Damnit rpf beat me to it I think it has to deal with pronounciation then the actual fact of whether or not the vowel is in front. In the case of unit, you pronounce it as yunit, not oonit, if it was the later then there would be an "an" in front since it's a vowel sound in front. and why the fuck are we talking about grammar in a mafia game? Because saying "I am about to make a proposal which you will be unable to turn down" is a lot less intimidating than "I'm gonna make you an offer you cannot refuse" and why do you need the proper way to say that? eh? because you're mafia and don't want to look like an idiot in front of your victims?
|
On February 19 2008 01:35 Romance_us wrote:
It makes the most logical sense to me that the people talking the MOST and stirring shit up are the most likely to be suspects. They have already edged us on to lynching two innocent people in one night. I certainly do not trust TRACIL or fakesteve for that matter.
And even if fakesteve is not mafioso, we clearly need a more level-headed mayor. He used one of his double-lynches to kill two innocent townies for Christ's sake! Well if we kill fakesteve we don't get to elect another mayor, whether or not losing out on the remaining 3 double lynches is worth getting rid of him is still up in the air though.
|
On February 19 2008 11:41 Empyrean wrote:
Actually, form a mafia standpoint, it would probably make more sense to kill randomly in order to not have any leads as to who they are.
In my opinion, we should just start lynching people randomly. Just select random numbers from the list and lynch them. Alright, someone anyone, pick two numbers between 1 and 6. whatever number you pick isn't going to directly be that number (for example if you pick two, I'm not going to say lynch whoever #2 is just...ok I don't know how I'm going to explain this without giving away my technique(I'll explain afterwards)) just someone pick two numbers between 1 and 6.
edit: might work better with 1 and 6 actually.
|
On February 19 2008 12:04 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2008 12:01 Falcynn wrote:On February 19 2008 11:41 Empyrean wrote:
Actually, form a mafia standpoint, it would probably make more sense to kill randomly in order to not have any leads as to who they are.
In my opinion, we should just start lynching people randomly. Just select random numbers from the list and lynch them. Alright, someone anyone, pick two numbers between 1 and 6. whatever number you pick isn't going to directly be that number (for example if you pick two, I'm not going to say lynch whoever #2 is just...ok I don't know how I'm going to explain this without giving away my technique(I'll explain afterwards)) just someone pick two numbers between 1 and 6. edit: might work better with 1 and 6 actually. So we pick a number and you tell us who to lynch. In other words, you have full control over who gets lynched? Don't think so. I said I'll explain my technique afterwards so you can decide if it's fine or not -,-
edit: and for even more randomness, tell me what state you're from if you're in the United States, if not then I'll come up with something else.
edit2: goddamnit, I hope noone's figured out what I'm getting at from that last part.
|
god damnit, just pick 2 numbers and tell me what state you live in.
or province, w/e
|
lynch #6 and 12 those were the second and third winning lotto numbers of the canadian lottery, there sound good?
fuck I trust Tracil, and #12 is dead, someone else numbers and state.
edit2: the BC lotto has the same numbers as the Canadian lottery page I checked so it's the same.
|
ulszz got first, lynch 18 and 8 (I counted powerball as 6th number)
so lynch zdd and so no fek, anyone else agree?
|
ah crap, I found a fatal flaw in my plan, some (well most) lotteries only go up to 50, so everyone with a number higher than 50 is safe T.T
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
