EPTIn my opinion, we should just start lynching people randomly. Just select random numbers from the list and lynch them.
Team Liquid Mafia [gg] - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Empyrean
17010 Posts
In my opinion, we should just start lynching people randomly. Just select random numbers from the list and lynch them. | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
On February 19 2008 12:11 Falcynn wrote: lynch #6 and 12 those were the second and third winning lotto numbers of the canadian lottery, there sound good? fuck I trust Tracil, and #12 is dead, someone else numbers and state. edit2: the BC lotto has the same numbers as the Canadian lottery page I checked so it's the same. Ha! What a loser ;D 1, 6. Indiana. | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
Someone give me a country and a fruit. I'll give MY method when I post next! | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
I take the country, its capital, the fruit genus and species, and count the number of letters in each. I multiply them together, and cube the result. The resulting number will be divided into groups of two (doesn't matter if it's an odd result, I'll just omit the last number). The first group that corresponds with a player will be selected! Belgium, Brussels, Punica, Granatum 19 | 42 | 17 | 24 | 67 | 2 Player number 19! | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
EDIT: An appropriate pun would be: "That would be fen with me!" I deserve to be shot...or lynched. omg. EDIT 2: For the pun. And really, don't lynch me  | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
On February 19 2008 12:39 Tracil wrote: Even relying on clues would be better than random guessing. You could find an contrived connection with clues to make relying on them akin to relying on random guessing. You saw how positive we were with the clues we had, yet we ended up lynching two innocent townies? Yeah. On a side note, all three sentences began with the letter Y! EDIT: Yeah, I'm not being serious either. | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
By the way, I'm going to sleep now. Be back tomorrow! | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
Off to real sleep now. Seriously. | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
My thoughts: First, to the people who're calling for a double lynch, it's probably too late now. Second, just because people were opposed to Shallow doesn't mean that they aren't mafia themselves. It's VERY possible that Shallow was just a "sacrifice" mafioso; he was going to get lynched soon enough anyway after the whole DrDragoon fiasco, so he could have arranged for some mafia members to "go against" him. Once Shallow died, the mafia members who opposed Shallow would have all doubt on them removed since, hell, they voted to lynch a mafia member! Because of this, I honestly don't think that just because someone accused Shallow, they are an innocent towny. Tracil, your thoughts on this? I know you're quite experienced in these games so I was just wondering if my thinking was correct. "Thirdly", these clues are still as vague as ever. Is there any chance Chuiu could make them less, say, ambiguous? It's very easy to find a contrived "connection" to just about anyone from just about any clue. Personally, I think these clues are throwing us off; we should focus on people's responses and play-style more, instead of relying on "clues". EDIT: "Thirdly"...otherwise I would have had two second points. | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
On February 20 2008 12:31 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: you guys are unbelievably stupid | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
One thing I'm very interested in: if some mafia members aren't responding, or don't check this thread or something, can other mafia members vote in proxy in their stead? If so, then there may be lots of inactive players who are mafia members whose "mafia votes" are being used by other mafia members. This could change the game dramatically. EDIT: I'd like to get Dapperdan or Chuiu's response for my question above, if possible. If not, then probably some other knowledgeable person. | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
On February 20 2008 10:54 Tracil wrote: Mmm. I'm not sure overthinking is quite the right word. Part of my general game theory is that people who talk often and frequently are generally more likely to be town than scum, and if they ARE scum, it'll come out in what they say. Conversly, people who are silent are awful for town. So... I'm still pretty suspicious of Caller, and actually his latest posts look kinda bad. But I think it would be better if we took some time to yell at people not talking at all. @Tracil, why do you think so? @HotZhot, you're probably right. Just throwing stuff out there. Off to sleep! | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
On February 21 2008 08:03 dinmsab wrote: My vote is for Live2Win. GTFO. And it's natural for people to be suspicious, so I don't see why Tracil being suspicious is any indication of guilt. | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
On February 21 2008 11:56 CDRdude wrote: I see a lot of people voting for L2W. Remind me, what clues pointed to him, if any? I never really got a sense of being mafia from him. I guess at this rate, we'll find out. Well, we had "clues" pointed at other people which turned out to be duds. At the moment, we're just voting based on how people act during the thread. | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
On February 22 2008 05:57 Southlight wrote: Also, Empyrean Dogma: I am God. Connects with - "you will have to answer for this to god" Wait...if I were mafia, I will have to answer for this to myself? Right. ... In the meantime, I'm going to jump on the bandwagon! I am voting for FakeSteve for no good reason.  | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
... | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
I'm voting yes on the extension, just to see how this all resolves out. And where the hell is the Detective? Finally, yeah, I just meant to say she LOOKS 15, not she IS 15. <_< | ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
| ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
| ||
|
Empyrean
17010 Posts
... | ||
| ||
