[M][T] Aperture Mafia 4, Episode 2 - Page 5

On October 29 2020 03:29 Hapahauli wrote:
Therrre we go, Slam failed the test.

On October 29 2020 03:44 Hapahauli wrote:
Rayn and Iamp get A's.

Acro gets a B.

Grack gets a C+.

Shockey gets an Incomplete.

On October 29 2020 03:49 Hapahauli wrote:
Yeah yeah whatever. I know you’re town and that’s all I care about for now. Have fun screaming at a wall.

On October 29 2020 03:57 Hapahauli wrote:


The way he addressed my claim makes him town. That is how Town-Rayn acts when he is confronted when an "experienced player" does something that doesn't make sense to him.



Absolutely not.

This post:



and this post:



Are not congruent.

On October 29 2020 04:24 Hapahauli wrote:
The fuck are you smoking?

On October 29 2020 04:26 ShoCkeyy wrote:
Lamp and Hapa confirmed mafia.





Rayn posted near 4:20, you should know what he's smoking.

On October 29 2020 04:27 yamato77 wrote:
I think this game is probably best played with a bit more close-to-the-vest style of forming reads (especially so in a Day 0 where not much of value can occur), so I am going to refrain from widely commenting on everything I have observed in the thread so far and instead discuss specific points of interest and how they would relate to potential night actions taken by the town in the coming phase.

I think that we absolutely should attempt to limit who visits the Database, and I generally agree with the notion that we should accept volunteers. The interesting point is who they should attempt to target with their action, and in that I think we already have an excellent candidate. Grack, if we continue to believe he is town (for reasons previously stated by others), should absolutely try to find out more about Hapahauli's role. That said, roleblocks may prevent this from happening, but this is the sort of thing we should be trying to do with the Database instead of simply worrying about its effect on game mechanics. Agreed?

I personally cannot be a part of this mission. I believe the most pro-town thing I could do is to take my own personal night action that deals with my role. Other than that, I think the best approach to this cycle will be to simply attempt to coordinate who is doing what and dealing with claims. It is a themed game so these mechanics cannot simply be ignored in favor of "scumhunting" early on in a game when we can't even lynch for a significant period of time.

On October 29 2020 04:37 yamato77 wrote:

I'm not going to play along in a rayn-game. If this turns into one I will just replace. Not worth my time.

On October 29 2020 04:39 yamato77 wrote:

He failed to comment on literally anything I said and made vague threats he can't even enforce for several more days, and did so in a completely disrespectful manner. I am not here to play in a shitflinging game. Not worth my time.

On October 29 2020 04:27 yamato77 wrote:
I think this game is probably best played with a bit more close-to-the-vest style of forming reads (especially so in a Day 0 where not much of value can occur), so I am going to refrain from widely commenting on everything I have observed in the thread so far and instead discuss specific points of interest and how they would relate to potential night actions taken by the town in the coming phase.

I think that we absolutely should attempt to limit who visits the Database, and I generally agree with the notion that we should accept volunteers. The interesting point is who they should attempt to target with their action, and in that I think we already have an excellent candidate. Grack, if we continue to believe he is town (for reasons previously stated by others), should absolutely try to find out more about Hapahauli's role. That said, roleblocks may prevent this from happening, but this is the sort of thing we should be trying to do with the Database instead of simply worrying about its effect on game mechanics. Agreed?

I personally cannot be a part of this mission. I believe the most pro-town thing I could do is to take my own personal night action that deals with my role. Other than that, I think the best approach to this cycle will be to simply attempt to coordinate who is doing what and dealing with claims. It is a themed game so these mechanics cannot simply be ignored in favor of "scumhunting" early on in a game when we can't even lynch for a significant period of time.

On October 29 2020 04:39 yamato77 wrote:

He failed to comment on literally anything I said and made vague threats he can't even enforce for several more days, and did so in a completely disrespectful manner. I am not here to play in a shitflinging game. Not worth my time.

On October 29 2020 04:45 Hapahauli wrote:
Rayn, when you disagree with someone, you tend to do so in a tone that comes across as extremely aggressive and personal.

I don't think you intend it, but that's my experience... both in the last game we played and this one.

You can take it for what it is worth.

On October 29 2020 04:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
How am i being incredibly rude to you yamato?