|
On March 05 2019 03:33 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2019 11:15 Blazinghand wrote:
TBH I think it would be reasonable to spend the lynch or the free mayor lynch on me today. I don't mind being knocked out early, and it would give other players a chance to play longer and have more fun. Same with eating a vigi bullet if needed I would be fine with killing blazinghand today. He asked us to lynch him might as well make me happy. Plus the second sentence feels fake to me. Like no way he actually believes that if he were town.
Hm. Lamp and I are finally agreeing on something.
|
On March 05 2019 04:08 Holyflare wrote:
Let's start this blazinghand shitfest shall we? What better way to start off the end of the world than lynch the tyrant himself!
I don't think I have ever heard a better reason to lynch someone.
|
Lets do this!
On March 05 2019 04:13 Acrofales wrote:
##unvote
##vote: Blazinghand
|
Hey Holyflare, is your mayorial shank still aimed straight at Palmar's heart? If so, this mayor train that's forming up on you is pretty damn troubling.
|
On March 05 2019 04:23 Pandain wrote:
I haven't read the last thirty or so pages and I won't have time.
Thoughts were that fecalfeast seemed clearly reading and active in the thread but completely contentless. I don't think we should be looking to lynch someone extremely active as well.
I had a spreadsheet I was working on, I'll post my more important notes from there.
On March 05 2019 04:15 Pandain wrote:
##mayor: holyflare
##vote: fecalfeast
Hmmmmrmmmmmmm
|
In fact, both our mayors are a bit troublesome. Although the longer Sentinel is useless the better I feel if Palmar still wants to shank him. I'm not feeling the conversion train though.
|
On March 05 2019 04:42 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 04:40 darthfoley wrote:On March 05 2019 04:35 Conversion wrote:On March 05 2019 04:32 darthfoley wrote:On March 05 2019 02:56 Conversion wrote:On March 05 2019 00:16 darthfoley wrote:On March 03 2019 11:01 Conversion wrote:
I’m going to bed, but @MrWiggles telling me I didn’t do fuck all but stray away my point on MZ.. what?
I was literally advocating going away from the point until Vivax kept pushing for answers? Are you on drugs? I just read Conversion's filter and it's like 90% about MeapZ. He even claims he wants to "go away from that point" yet continues to harp on it afterwards. I've been waiting for him to say something about ANYONE else in the game and the only other name he's thought of mentioning is Oats On March 04 2019 08:13 Conversion wrote:
I’m back sort of. I have interviews all week so wont play much today.
did MZ ever explain his reasoning on why he put Oats low on his scum list for scumreading me, the same as him, but excluded me from his to lynch list? also why he agreed with Oats making a large post of bullshit voted and saying “not town?”
if not I’d like to lynch him On March 04 2019 23:31 Conversion wrote:re: MZ On March 03 2019 23:54 Conversion wrote:On March 03 2019 07:27 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On March 03 2019 07:24 Holyflare wrote:
[quote]
Yet oats doesn't feature in your 3 want to lynches?
I mean I wouldn't be upset with an oats lynch but I think that Grack or iamp are better choices. Plus he has conversion as scum which I agree with so that pushes him down my priority list. what the fuck is this post? if you agree with someone that I am scum, why am I not in your lynch list and why aren’t you pushing for it? On March 03 2019 23:59 Conversion wrote:On March 03 2019 23:54 Conversion wrote:On March 03 2019 07:27 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
[quote]
I mean I wouldn't be upset with an oats lynch but I think that Grack or iamp are better choices. Plus he has conversion as scum which I agree with so that pushes him down my priority list. what the fuck is this post? if you agree with someone that I am scum, why am I not in your lynch list and why aren’t you pushing for it? also you found that Oats was good to agree with because he put one post with a bunch of votes that included me and said “not town?” dude doesn't want to lynch oats because oats scumreads me like he (MZ) does, but doesn't push it any further. has 1 scum read that he doesn't pursue very hard, and then makes a giant fucking google docs post just tracking reads and painting it green/red also oats reason for scumreading me was a giant fucking useless post of quoting a bunch of votes and going "not town" and he refuses to acknowledge that it's a pretty dumb reason to agree that someone is sharing your scumread based on that I think you just described your filter. On March 04 2019 23:39 Conversion wrote:
I just read MZ's reply to me and 50% of him is just ad hominem about how I can't read or how I'm dumb
fun stuff and this is the shit you guys want me to catch up on lmao On March 04 2019 23:55 Conversion wrote:
also rereading MZ's "defense" against me he still doesn't explain why oats throwing shit against a wall is enough justification for him to drop him in his lynch list, instead of going like "the fuck is this shit you're throwing against a wall?" but whatever I'd be down for a Conversion lynch. His filter is a vast expanse of vagueness outside of MZ. His read hasn't developed or changed. He hasn't even seemed interested in pursuing any other leads. this is such a garbage post that did nothing but parrot Vivax, Palmar, and MZ are you serious? Yea, I’m serious. I post things as I catch up, not my fault other people see the same thing I do. How about you stop calling other people garbage and do something useful? You love to complain yet do fuck all to actually progress the game. You scumread MZ for having the same filter as you, which is at best hypocritical and at worst fishing for low hanging fruit as scum. If you’re Town please do anything else aww is poor little darthfoley mad? how about you actually catch up on the game instead of making shitty posts like this and being underwhelming? Nah you’re just annoying as fuck. I have skimmed the last 5-8 pages on my break, but I’ll look at your Tubestock stuff when I get home from work. and you're annoying as fuck too. don't bother talking to me if you're going to act like a little bitch for shit you've called me out in the past. thanks ![[image loading]](http://www.quickmeme.com/img/69/69fbf7240f42620c870bdc173856ead82781e930db2ac505e941931fc2c24ea1.jpg)
|
Damn. I thought I got the image right. Screw phoneposting memes. Must not allow deep linking images or something. Here. Different source, and none of the light-hearted de-escalation I was going for.
![[image loading]](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/353/279/e31.jpg)
|
On March 05 2019 04:45 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
What's with the BH train? If you want to kill a hardcore lurker like that why not use the mayor lynch? I don't see the benefit
Because BH is not your typical lurker. IMHO it's like foolishness or sandroba lurking. They hate playing scum, so just don't.
|
On March 05 2019 04:52 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 04:48 Trfel wrote:
Voting Palmar for mayor because of all of the mayors' targets I want to see [UoN]Sentinel lynched most. Him having a townread on himself while claiming to have not read his role PM is super suspicious, moreso the more I think about it. Other than his huge list post he hasn't shown much thought at all, he's been just following the thread sentiment. His overall play makes his effort seem fabricated. A few reasons being quoting my reasoning in one area while highly scumreading me in another, and more importantly not seeming at all invested in his reads. If he put all that effort into reading and making his scumreads, he wouldn't not actually push those reads and follow the thread sentiment like a headless chicken. It feels forced, and like he's trying to use the effort to prove he's town.
##Mayor Palmar Catching up but nearly everything in this post is either wrong or disingenuous BH isn't in this game and unless this is some sort of last minute ploy to get him to come out, seeing as we've got 4 hours to deadline I don't approve of wasting a vote on a player who isn't even around to defend himself
Turns out he was here all along, lurking until his train took out from the station. If he flips scum, I'm looking at you next.
|
On March 05 2019 05:00 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 04:54 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 04:45 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
What's with the BH train? If you want to kill a hardcore lurker like that why not use the mayor lynch? I don't see the benefit Because BH is not your typical lurker. IMHO it's like foolishness or sandroba lurking. They hate playing scum, so just don't. Even assuming this is true the only way this makes sense is if we have absolutely no other candidates to lynch. BH has barely defended himself and he's barely posted in the thread which means we barely get any information when we learn his role except maybe who sheeped his vote.
I'd rather lynch scum than "information". God, you're really trying to dig yourself into this hole, aren't you? :O
|
On March 05 2019 05:03 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:01 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:00 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 04:54 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 04:45 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
What's with the BH train? If you want to kill a hardcore lurker like that why not use the mayor lynch? I don't see the benefit Because BH is not your typical lurker. IMHO it's like foolishness or sandroba lurking. They hate playing scum, so just don't. Even assuming this is true the only way this makes sense is if we have absolutely no other candidates to lynch. BH has barely defended himself and he's barely posted in the thread which means we barely get any information when we learn his role except maybe who sheeped his vote. I'd rather lynch scum than "information". God, you're really trying to dig yourself into this hole, aren't you? :O No, you'd rather pick an easy lynch based off activity rather than trying to figure out who all the scum are.
Lol. Hi pot.
|
On March 05 2019 05:07 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:05 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:03 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:01 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:00 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 04:54 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 04:45 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
What's with the BH train? If you want to kill a hardcore lurker like that why not use the mayor lynch? I don't see the benefit Because BH is not your typical lurker. IMHO it's like foolishness or sandroba lurking. They hate playing scum, so just don't. Even assuming this is true the only way this makes sense is if we have absolutely no other candidates to lynch. BH has barely defended himself and he's barely posted in the thread which means we barely get any information when we learn his role except maybe who sheeped his vote. I'd rather lynch scum than "information". God, you're really trying to dig yourself into this hole, aren't you? :O No, you'd rather pick an easy lynch based off activity rather than trying to figure out who all the scum are. Lol. Hi pot. Here are my scumreads rn LS Damdred Tictock Trfel I'm fine with lynching any of the four and I want whoever I do lynch to say as much as they can before they die so that maybe I can learn something useful
LS martyred and gave up.
Damdred is lurking somewhere, but I'm trusting ppl who know him better than me to make sense of his uselessness. But he's a lurker.
Ticktock didn't seem scummy except for that really bad reentry and fuck off today. But he already said he won't be back before the deadline so if your aim is to have a discussion, maybe read the thread?
So the only real "scum read" that follows your own rules is trfel. Great. I actually agree he is scummy as crap. But he actually looks like he's playing, rather than telling us to lynch him. Sure, we could vig BH. Or, being a high profile target who is martyring himself because he can't be bothered to read the thread, we could lynch him dead. And if he flips scum,
|
If he flips scum, I am totes looking into every scummy fuck that tried to detail that wagon.
|
On March 05 2019 05:17 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:13 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:11 iamperfection wrote:On March 05 2019 05:08 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:06 iamperfection wrote:
Bh is unacceptable and he has had plenty of time to do something productive he is scum Well, my lack of activity being unacceptable? absolutely. If you think that "BH is inactive when he is scum" is even close to a correct heuristic you must have never played with me, or seen or hosted or observed any game I'm in. Come on, dude, you know that isn't true. Be a man and vote me on policy. Don't make false statements about my meta. I don't give a shit about your meta. You somehow mayor vote palmar when you haven't read at all he didn't play untill page 40 It's a policy vote and you know it. Admit it. Be a man. I looked in the vote thread and saw someone had voted for him for mayor, and Palmar's a decent player, so I voted for him too. I figured it would be productive. I don't even know why i'm arguing, I'm fine dying. I just hate people saying wrong things Why are you complaining about policy votes when your first pick for mayor has been a guy who's exclusively promised a policy vote
Why are you misrepresenting Palmar?
|
On March 05 2019 05:21 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:21 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:19 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:17 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:13 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:11 iamperfection wrote:On March 05 2019 05:08 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:06 iamperfection wrote:
Bh is unacceptable and he has had plenty of time to do something productive he is scum Well, my lack of activity being unacceptable? absolutely. If you think that "BH is inactive when he is scum" is even close to a correct heuristic you must have never played with me, or seen or hosted or observed any game I'm in. Come on, dude, you know that isn't true. Be a man and vote me on policy. Don't make false statements about my meta. I don't give a shit about your meta. You somehow mayor vote palmar when you haven't read at all he didn't play untill page 40 It's a policy vote and you know it. Admit it. Be a man. I looked in the vote thread and saw someone had voted for him for mayor, and Palmar's a decent player, so I voted for him too. I figured it would be productive. I don't even know why i'm arguing, I'm fine dying. I just hate people saying wrong things Why are you complaining about policy votes when your first pick for mayor has been a guy who's exclusively promised a policy vote Why are you misrepresenting Palmar? At what point in time did Palmar change his opinion Wait is Palmar promising something other than "I'll lynch a lurker"?
Yes. He's promising to lynch sentinel for not reading his role pm.
|
On March 05 2019 05:21 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:19 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:17 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:13 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:11 iamperfection wrote:On March 05 2019 05:08 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:06 iamperfection wrote:
Bh is unacceptable and he has had plenty of time to do something productive he is scum Well, my lack of activity being unacceptable? absolutely. If you think that "BH is inactive when he is scum" is even close to a correct heuristic you must have never played with me, or seen or hosted or observed any game I'm in. Come on, dude, you know that isn't true. Be a man and vote me on policy. Don't make false statements about my meta. I don't give a shit about your meta. You somehow mayor vote palmar when you haven't read at all he didn't play untill page 40 It's a policy vote and you know it. Admit it. Be a man. I looked in the vote thread and saw someone had voted for him for mayor, and Palmar's a decent player, so I voted for him too. I figured it would be productive. I don't even know why i'm arguing, I'm fine dying. I just hate people saying wrong things Why are you complaining about policy votes when your first pick for mayor has been a guy who's exclusively promised a policy vote Why are you misrepresenting Palmar? At what point in time did Palmar change his opinion
He didn't as far as I know. But it's by no means the only thing he has done. And there is a real chance that he'll kill one of his scumreads over his policy. Conversion is up high on his list.
|
On March 05 2019 05:24 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:22 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:21 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:21 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:19 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:17 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:13 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:11 iamperfection wrote:On March 05 2019 05:08 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:06 iamperfection wrote:
Bh is unacceptable and he has had plenty of time to do something productive he is scum Well, my lack of activity being unacceptable? absolutely. If you think that "BH is inactive when he is scum" is even close to a correct heuristic you must have never played with me, or seen or hosted or observed any game I'm in. Come on, dude, you know that isn't true. Be a man and vote me on policy. Don't make false statements about my meta. I don't give a shit about your meta. You somehow mayor vote palmar when you haven't read at all he didn't play untill page 40 It's a policy vote and you know it. Admit it. Be a man. I looked in the vote thread and saw someone had voted for him for mayor, and Palmar's a decent player, so I voted for him too. I figured it would be productive. I don't even know why i'm arguing, I'm fine dying. I just hate people saying wrong things Why are you complaining about policy votes when your first pick for mayor has been a guy who's exclusively promised a policy vote Why are you misrepresenting Palmar? At what point in time did Palmar change his opinion Wait is Palmar promising something other than "I'll lynch a lurker"? Yes. He's promising to lynch sentinel for not reading his role pm. Hmm, that's fairly reasonable as these things go, but is anyone with any shot at the things running on a "lynch the least active player" type platform? I'd much prefer to vote for a mayor who is doing that.
If the top of my head that would kill onegu. But maybe there's someone I have forgotten about entirely. Onegu is on track for getting himself modkilled though.
|
On March 05 2019 05:23 Koshi wrote:
Tfrel rsoultin and BH need to go
Why rsoultin? I don't get it from your filter. Because of a "mafia emoticon" whut?
|
On March 05 2019 05:26 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2019 05:25 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:24 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:22 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:21 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:21 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:19 Acrofales wrote:On March 05 2019 05:17 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On March 05 2019 05:13 Blazinghand wrote:On March 05 2019 05:11 iamperfection wrote:
[quote]
I don't give a shit about your meta.
You somehow mayor vote palmar when you haven't read at all he didn't play untill page 40 It's a policy vote and you know it. Admit it. Be a man. I looked in the vote thread and saw someone had voted for him for mayor, and Palmar's a decent player, so I voted for him too. I figured it would be productive. I don't even know why i'm arguing, I'm fine dying. I just hate people saying wrong things Why are you complaining about policy votes when your first pick for mayor has been a guy who's exclusively promised a policy vote Why are you misrepresenting Palmar? At what point in time did Palmar change his opinion Wait is Palmar promising something other than "I'll lynch a lurker"? Yes. He's promising to lynch sentinel for not reading his role pm. Hmm, that's fairly reasonable as these things go, but is anyone with any shot at the things running on a "lynch the least active player" type platform? I'd much prefer to vote for a mayor who is doing that. If the top of my head that would kill onegu. But maybe there's someone I have forgotten about entirely. Onegu is on track for getting himself modkilled though. Hmm, if he's actually going to get modkilled, maybe that's actually fine and we can use the mayor lynch on someone else. I recall some pregame talk about not using modkills and instead giving town more ways to clear out inactive players, did anything pan out from that?
I dunno. That'd require reading the OP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
67370
1020
505
EPT
