|
.............................................................
that was so false and flailing that i'm not going to respond
|
nvm i'm going to have to eviserate this man
|
On November 21 2017 02:43 Stanislav Petrov wrote:
Okey I'll adress this exactly ones because it's taking up way to much threadspace.
Why I think darthfoley is mafia.
1)There was the Boson contradiction
2)His only reads are town
3)His not lynching chez post (Yes it's an unserious joke but mafia are more inclined to write a excuse for doing something both because they have a desire to guard themselves from any inqusitive people before they ask and because since they don't have genuine thoughts they write down their reason so they don't forget themselves)
The first 2 are the major points and they had been stated by others, It add's nothing for me to say it again or by rephrasing it slightly so it looks like my own thoughts.
4)So far darthfoley has still not tried to make a case on anybody else despite being the lynchcandiate.
1) This is not a big deal. I write down my thoughts as I play and I wanted to ask Boson a question. This is also not an original point by you so whatever
2) Just false
3) Lol, not your original point and also not a good point.
4) Also false
|
I definitely thought Petrov was a smurf but idk. His play reminds me of my first game on TL which I also rolled scum
|
On November 21 2017 02:55 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2017 02:52 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 21 2017 02:37 Hapahauli wrote:##Unvote Darthfoley##Vote Sanislav PetrovDarthfoley was a test. Stanislav Petrov failed. Holyflare failed. Tumblewood gets a D-. Stanislav Petrov is all-over-the-place, is throwing shade, and isn't pushing anything coherent. Shortly after giving a lynch list of... On November 19 2017 08:45 Stanislav Petrov wrote:On November 19 2017 08:39 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 19 2017 07:57 Stanislav Petrov wrote:Lets just lynch Damdred for prodding Oats and backing off immediately  Kelsier & Ruxxar look like they're doing scummy stuff together. Though without confirming if Ruxxar's game history is true, I rather slightly liked Damdreds point on dumb-telling. But ofcourse Damdred would know if Ruxxar was town since Damdred would know all the scum through association. Z-bozon I like what you're doing, let's get along muchacho! If you can tell us your mafia buddies, I will be more than glad to just chill and get along. Ignore the other person that called you retarded, he's just that mean. Cooperating with us is in your best interests. Btw, let's not get too deep into these web of associations this early on. Who would you choose as scum out of KelsierSC/Ruxxar/Damdred? One pick. I'd love to be able to oblige you but since I'm not mafia I can't. Truly saddens me. Right now the order I'd like to lynch in is Damdred->KelsierSC->One of the lurkers ... he blind sheeps the darthfoley wagon without really ever pushing it. His next two posts are pushing the wagon without really contributing or attempting to figure out darthfoley: On November 20 2017 18:28 Stanislav Petrov wrote:On November 20 2017 14:46 Tumblewood wrote:
@hf: why is the df wagon okay despite no one trying to stop it? your reasons seem to amount to "he looks scummy", which is fine i guess, but if it's just that he's scummy are you even considering how the wagon forms? like, what would it take to change your mind, or do you just not actually care? You're trying to stop it right now. The 'nobody is trying to stop it so therefore the accused is innocent' argument sound good in theory but has rarely proved accurate in my experience. And that's without considering how disastrous it would be to let that become meta. The facts are darthfoley is the most suspicious person, so we should lynch him. ...and pushing two other players while having his vote on darthfoley. On November 21 2017 02:20 Stanislav Petrov wrote:
I intended to me more active but I've been having a fever with a killer headache so I've just done some casual reading and lurking. But I'll be here aswell untill the lynch aswell but as of now I don't see a reason to switch target.
Oat's have definitely been getting away with doing the bare minimum, spam, unserious accusations and asking non-important questions in a 2 page filter.
On Conversation. If he hadn't voted me I'd say he's done nothing but throw questions into the air and hope somebody else picked them up and pushed them for him which is scum play. But he did vote me but looking at that because it also feels ungenuine to me. He sheeped Kelsier for the case and didn't aggressively accuse me of being scum as much as he voted me as a parking vote to pressure me to come back and explain something fairly non-important. And has no other scumreads. I don't like that it feels like he's both pushing me superhard by singling me out as his only scumread and at the same time isn't pressuring me hard at all but just says come back and explain this and until you do I'll have an alibi for voting you. So, heuristically I think that Stan would have been less all-over-the-place if he was mafia. He seems like a newer player not sure where to move next. I'd place him in the same category as TW: kinda mafia looking, kinda lynch-baity looking. Holyflare has done little but tunnel darthfoley, who was already leading in votes. I'm not sure what the townie motivation there is there. He looks a lot more scummy in his defensiveness to my eyes. I would also be down for an oatsmaster lynch. Please look at his filter and agree. You think oats filter is bad? Try reading koshi.
If you're serious about this Koshi thing, write a case and try to convince people. Otherwise you're just wasting time and thread space. We only have 2.5 hours until deadline
|
Basically people are defending Stan for being all over the place, yet the big accusation against me is that I was "all over the place" once with one question about my first town read 6 hours into D1.
LoL
|
On November 21 2017 02:59 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2017 02:56 Hapahauli wrote:On November 21 2017 02:52 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 21 2017 02:37 Hapahauli wrote:##Unvote Darthfoley##Vote Sanislav PetrovDarthfoley was a test. Stanislav Petrov failed. Holyflare failed. Tumblewood gets a D-. Stanislav Petrov is all-over-the-place, is throwing shade, and isn't pushing anything coherent. Shortly after giving a lynch list of... On November 19 2017 08:45 Stanislav Petrov wrote:On November 19 2017 08:39 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 19 2017 07:57 Stanislav Petrov wrote:Lets just lynch Damdred for prodding Oats and backing off immediately Kelsier & Ruxxar look like they're doing scummy stuff together. Though without confirming if Ruxxar's game history is true, I rather slightly liked Damdreds point on dumb-telling. But ofcourse Damdred would know if Ruxxar was town since Damdred would know all the scum through association. Z-bozon I like what you're doing, let's get along muchacho! If you can tell us your mafia buddies, I will be more than glad to just chill and get along. Ignore the other person that called you retarded, he's just that mean. Cooperating with us is in your best interests. Btw, let's not get too deep into these web of associations this early on. Who would you choose as scum out of KelsierSC/Ruxxar/Damdred? One pick. I'd love to be able to oblige you but since I'm not mafia I can't. Truly saddens me. Right now the order I'd like to lynch in is Damdred->KelsierSC->One of the lurkers ... he blind sheeps the darthfoley wagon without really ever pushing it. His next two posts are pushing the wagon without really contributing or attempting to figure out darthfoley: On November 20 2017 18:28 Stanislav Petrov wrote:On November 20 2017 14:46 Tumblewood wrote:
@hf: why is the df wagon okay despite no one trying to stop it? your reasons seem to amount to "he looks scummy", which is fine i guess, but if it's just that he's scummy are you even considering how the wagon forms? like, what would it take to change your mind, or do you just not actually care? You're trying to stop it right now. The 'nobody is trying to stop it so therefore the accused is innocent' argument sound good in theory but has rarely proved accurate in my experience. And that's without considering how disastrous it would be to let that become meta. The facts are darthfoley is the most suspicious person, so we should lynch him. ...and pushing two other players while having his vote on darthfoley. On November 21 2017 02:20 Stanislav Petrov wrote:
I intended to me more active but I've been having a fever with a killer headache so I've just done some casual reading and lurking. But I'll be here aswell untill the lynch aswell but as of now I don't see a reason to switch target.
Oat's have definitely been getting away with doing the bare minimum, spam, unserious accusations and asking non-important questions in a 2 page filter.
On Conversation. If he hadn't voted me I'd say he's done nothing but throw questions into the air and hope somebody else picked them up and pushed them for him which is scum play. But he did vote me but looking at that because it also feels ungenuine to me. He sheeped Kelsier for the case and didn't aggressively accuse me of being scum as much as he voted me as a parking vote to pressure me to come back and explain something fairly non-important. And has no other scumreads. I don't like that it feels like he's both pushing me superhard by singling me out as his only scumread and at the same time isn't pressuring me hard at all but just says come back and explain this and until you do I'll have an alibi for voting you. So, heuristically I think that Stan would have been less all-over-the-place if he was mafia. He seems like a newer player not sure where to move next. I'd place him in the same category as TW: kinda mafia looking, kinda lynch-baity looking. Holyflare has done little but tunnel darthfoley, who was already leading in votes. I'm not sure what the townie motivation there is there. He looks a lot more scummy in his defensiveness to my eyes. I would also be down for an oatsmaster lynch. Please look at his filter and agree. Oats is behaving like oats. It's been a while since I've played with him, but all his games are pretty one-linery-ish, incoherent, spammy, etc. What specifically about him is damning? Last three or four games hes been hyperactive oats with the wffort.
Hyper active + lots of aggression, 1v1s and standoffishness. Much different from this game
|
On November 21 2017 03:02 Z-BosoN wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2017 02:59 darthfoley wrote:
Basically people are defending Stan for being all over the place, yet the big accusation against me is that I was "all over the place" once with one question about my first town read 6 hours into D1.
LoL Umm... Im the only one that said Stan is being all over the place. Im also not happy with lynching you... so....
Conversion and a couple others have said similar things iirc
|
On November 21 2017 03:10 Z-BosoN wrote:well he has 50 games. ok so he's just a black box to me then. Show nested quote +On November 21 2017 03:05 darthfoley wrote:On November 21 2017 03:02 Z-BosoN wrote:On November 21 2017 02:59 darthfoley wrote:
Basically people are defending Stan for being all over the place, yet the big accusation against me is that I was "all over the place" once with one question about my first town read 6 hours into D1.
LoL Umm... Im the only one that said Stan is being all over the place. Im also not happy with lynching you... so.... Conversion and a couple others have said similar things iirc I see. And do you agree with that pseudo-defense?
Not at all. I think Stan's all over the place play is not town indicative. I've explained why I think he's scum.
His case on me when called out is also just booty cheeks. No original points, 3/4 points are false, etc.
|
Noted how many people have displayed interest in Oats and TW yet neither have gotten votes?
That changes
##Unvote
##Vote: Tumblewood
|
I will be very sparse activity in about 10 minutes until deadline. I will be on phone but without much time to analyze much. I'm between TW and Petrov
|
##Unvote
##Vote: Stanislav Petrov
|
On November 21 2017 03:38 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2017 03:21 KelsierSC wrote:
I'm out until deadline , don't screw up No seriously this is bs. You are the sole guy voting for TW and you leave the rest of us with 2 wagons telling us not to screw up. That’s some shady shit if I’ve ever seen it.
+1
Very very bad post that makes me queasy
|
On November 21 2017 03:46 Damdred wrote:
I think it is a bad post but not scum indicative.
Why not? Off wagon person telling the rest to not screw up is Town indicative?
|
On November 21 2017 04:13 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2017 02:24 darthfoley wrote:On November 21 2017 02:13 ruXxar wrote:On November 21 2017 01:59 darthfoley wrote:+ Show Spoiler +all these people off wagon saying I shouldn't be lynched without really providing alternatives. + Show Spoiler + Let’s get a koshi lynch going baby. You know you want to. I love a good Belgian spanking. Why Koshi over Oats/TW/Stan? Why not pick one? Oh right, you are keeping your options open to jump on any of those that gain traction
Not keeping my options open
|
On November 21 2017 04:19 Oatsmaster wrote:
Nah not lynching holyflare today.
Darth, at that point you were. Why did you continuously ask people about the 3 people in that post?
If you consider me having three scum reads in a game of 15 people and pushing them over myself getting lynched as "keeping my options open" then sure. Otherwise stop
Made my intentions clear throughout the day. Go back and read. I've been Stan > TW > You the whole day basically. Fuck off with the misrepresentations
|
I don't want to case Kelsier now lol but remember that comment later
|
On November 21 2017 04:25 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2017 04:20 Z-BosoN wrote:
Also why the FUCK do you want me to change my vote? If you have been reading, you would know I would much prefer Stan, not the person you are voting on. Ok so this is just really weird. I asked zbo if he wanted to waste his vote on holyflare and this is how he responded. None of that says HF. And it's extremely defensive. I want everyone to vote for darth.
And I ant you to get your head out of your ass
|
On November 21 2017 04:31 Oatsmaster wrote:
And then Petrov voted for DF so I don't feel inclined to push Petrov over DF
Read Petrov's reasons for voting for me. They were all terrible and false
|
On November 21 2017 04:35 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2017 04:32 Damdred wrote:On November 21 2017 04:29 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 21 2017 04:27 Damdred wrote:
Darth is town though I believe, so nope I think Stan is a good place for me.
We can talk kel tonight if you make it df.
Er alright totally gonna convince people with that. Oh wait no, you are just unnecessarily justifying not lynching scum Actually I am pretty sure Stan will be lynched today over df. You are painting df as scummy for having multiple people as his scum reads. That is not inherently scummy, in fact it is in fact good content to push him on. His reasoning for stan is ok, and him trying to aurvive is null. The content he has produced and his thoughts are generally town focused. So yes, df is more than likely town. Im painting DF as scummy for not having a specific person he thinks is mafia and wants to Lynch/vote for until like 2 hours ago. I don't care if he tries to survive, I care if he paints it like he thinks everyone is equally scummy and asking people which one they want to Lynch.
Petrov: DF scum for only having townreads
Oats: DF scum for having equal scum reads and not pushing anyone
Both are false
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
