|
|
|
On October 31 2017 04:40 Tictock wrote:
I'll /in to help this get started soon.
I will be the obligatory afk'er. ( I still work 70 hour weeks).
Feel free to give my slot away if anyone else wants to play, but I can at least keep the slot warm.
must be a programmer or some kind of engineering 
edit: damn, I was wrong.
|
lol at this early game posting. Is this the new meta? To just claim something and then hope no one notices you lied?
|
On November 01 2017 07:45 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 07:44 ShoCkeyy wrote:
lol at this early game posting. Is this the new meta? To just claim something and then hope no one notices you lied? we’re just ‘avin a blast mate. how are you?
I'm doing well, just got off a work call, gotta shower and hoping that there's more posts when I'm done.
|
Of course you don't liar.
|
Yes all liars until proven innocent.
|
|
|
As if a town read from you means much right now 
|
|
|
My last game was a long time ago. What does that say about me?
|
Look at that, I got two almost three pages worth of info out of my one little measly post.
Still haven't seen these people post either:
4. The_Zen_Man
5. Oatsmaster
10. Breshke
12. Vivax
13. Tictock
So we'd still have to wait till they show up.
|
I mean the game just started, there is nothing to really post about other than Conversion getting triggered about being "grilled"... I also posted the list because I mentioned it's too early to even try to vote because these "list" haven't posted yet.
I haven't really played with any of you other than Holy, Damred, Vivax, and what may be Oatsmaster (but I don't recall). So I'm still just poking around and seeing what comes out of what. I don't mind taking the fall for now until some one slips, cause it's what I usually do. So far those who are "suspicious" of me, one of them have a good chance at being scum
|
On November 01 2017 11:43 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 11:39 ShoCkeyy wrote:I mean the game just started, there is nothing to really post about other than Conversion getting triggered about being "grilled"... I also posted the list because I mentioned it's too early to even try to vote because these "list" haven't posted yet. I haven't really played with any of you other than Holy, Damred, Vivax, and what may be Oatsmaster (but I don't recall). So I'm still just poking around and seeing what comes out of what. I don't mind taking the fall for now until some one slips, cause it's what I usually do. So far those who are "suspicious" of me, one of them have a good chance at being scum So what are your thoughts on me getting triggered? I especially liked DF's posts on Ruxx and his response to being questioned. What's your thoughts on that?
Meh... too me it's fluff.
On November 01 2017 11:10 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 08:49 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:02 Damerion wrote:
##vote ShoCkeyy[/b
I ask and expect you all to follow me on this.
@Damdred especially you. Slow down hotshot. When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. Name recognition help for sure, but it’s also about how you present yourself and your arguments. Perfect example is Lonelyclock last game. A newbie, but very solid town-read with a lot of credibility. Someone presenting themselves like that pushes a lot of weight around. Don’t get me wrong, I like your more confident approach, but it’s throwing me off because it’s so different from previous games, and it’s also a bit too much over the top and appears a bit forced. I dislike ruxxar's early game filter. Super fluff with no substance. Yea, sure, lots of people are posting fluff kinda. But ruxxar's gives me the vibes of feigning activity to seem interested. It's pretty easy to do early game especially, when people are dicking about. Besides that, I have no idea why he feels the need to dictate how Damerion votes, the aggressiveness of his vote, and the subsequent commentary Let me break down the bolded sentence for you 1) "Don't get me wrong" = apologetic, not trying to tread on anyone's toes, like scumversion last game 2) "I like your more confident approach" implies a town lean of some sort, with buddy potential 3) So he likes the confident approach, BUT it's throwing him off because it's so different from last game. So you like it... but it's throwing you off? 4) It's also "a bit too much over the top and feels forced" implying it's scummy. So to conclude, Ruxxar likes Damerion's aggressive and confident play even though it's throwing him off but it's over the top and feels forced. So why do you like the approach if you are going to call it scummy one line later? This is a whole lot of nothing burger
I can kinda understand ruxxar questioning Damerion's reason to vote so early, and it's not that he's dictating, he's just saying to take it slow.
I think this post clearly explains Ruxxar's thinking.
[B]On November 01 2017 09:20 ruXxar wrote: Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 09:08 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 09:05 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:59 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:57 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:53 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:
[quote]
Slow down hotshot.
When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. nah actually I'm willing to blind follow you 100% after the last 2 games you're not as good this game though so that's weird.also I never trust HF because he is a "big name" so that's a bad point What’s that supposed to mean??? oi don't red text me m8 he just seems weird throwing out all these soft reads. his usual play has been slam down hard with a big read that calls out 2/3 or 3/3 scum, but idk. maybe he's trying to be more active b/c he died last game because of it, but I don't like it You’re saying he’s not as good when no one has flipped yet. It doesn’t make sense in the context you’re trying to appropriate to him. You’re trying to measure his “good play” based on his posts rather than the result of his reads. If his previous games reads had all been wrong, then you wouldn’t be calling his big read posts good. Like.. I don’t see where you’re coming from. it's what HF said before, why change up your playstyle when nothing was wrong with it to begin with? the only reason I can think of is he wants to avoid being lynched b/c of activity again, so he tries to throw out soft reads by looking active. I don't like that if his big read posts in the previous games were off, then I can see why he's trying to change his playstyle I don't think I'm being unclear, and have no idea why you're nitpicking at the point, so make that two of us that don't understand each other Also, how is his read soft? He straight up called shockey mafia, voted for him and asked people to follow him.
I know I post like shit, but I do it for a reason, it's easy to be able to see who jumps on the "vote shockeyy" bandwagon, and of course one of the mafia members is easily going to jump on it, if not two cause my posting is so "shitty". Damerian is trying to use his credibility from his past two games to try and have a following into voting some one off easily. It's kinda scummy in my opinion.
|
My thoughts on you getting triggered? You're possibly town, that was desperately trying to prove he was town but came off as mafia to others because his choice of words.
|
And I won't like I at first thought Ruxxar could of been mafia, but after looking into DF, and Damerian post history, I prefer Ruxxar and DF as likely town.
|
On November 01 2017 12:04 ShoCkeyy wrote:
And I won't like I at first thought Ruxxar could of been mafia, but after looking into DF, and Damerian post history, I prefer Ruxxar and DF as likely town.
damn i butchered the beginning of that. "And I won't lie*"
|
On November 01 2017 12:37 Tictock wrote:
Humm, Shokey's more recent posts are ok, but I'm not a fan of the "I play like lynchbait to catch scum" defense.
Especially when he's apparently abandoning that strategy as soon as the pressure is starting to build.
Still the best early vote imo.
I'm around what? I just responded to questions asked directly at me.
|
On November 01 2017 13:13 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 12:04 ShoCkeyy wrote:
And I won't like I at first thought Ruxxar could of been mafia, but after looking into DF, and Damerian post history, I prefer Ruxxar and DF as likely town. Can you explain your thought process here? Why did you change your mind on Ruxxar? You make it sound like looking at my filter and Damerion's filter made you think Ruxxar was town, even though I've argued the opposite. Also, why does Damerion's post history help determine Ruxxar's alignment?
It's getting pretty late and I don't want to butcher my reasoning again but I'll get to it early morning.
On November 01 2017 13:07 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 13:05 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 01 2017 11:10 darthfoley wrote:On November 01 2017 08:49 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:02 Damerion wrote:
##vote ShoCkeyy[/b
I ask and expect you all to follow me on this.
@Damdred especially you. Slow down hotshot. When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. Name recognition help for sure, but it’s also about how you present yourself and your arguments. Perfect example is Lonelyclock last game. A newbie, but very solid town-read with a lot of credibility. Someone presenting themselves like that pushes a lot of weight around. [b]Don’t get me wrong, I like your more confident approach, but it’s throwing me off because it’s so different from previous games, and it’s also a bit too much over the top and appears a bit forced. I dislike ruxxar's early game filter. Super fluff with no substance. Yea, sure, lots of people are posting fluff kinda. But ruxxar's gives me the vibes of feigning activity to seem interested. It's pretty easy to do early game especially, when people are dicking about. Besides that, I have no idea why he feels the need to dictate how Damerion votes, the aggressiveness of his vote, and the subsequent commentary Let me break down the bolded sentence for you 1) "Don't get me wrong" = apologetic, not trying to tread on anyone's toes, like scumversion last game 2) "I like your more confident approach" implies a town lean of some sort, with buddy potential 3) So he likes the confident approach, BUT it's throwing him off because it's so different from last game. So you like it... but it's throwing you off? 4) It's also "a bit too much over the top and feels forced" implying it's scummy. So to conclude, Ruxxar likes Damerion's aggressive and confident play even though it's throwing him off but it's over the top and feels forced. So why do you like the approach if you are going to call it scummy one line later? This is a whole lot of nothing burger You are a whole lotta nothing burger. What are you eving doing with this post. Explaining why ruxxar's post is lame as hell and non-committal to the utmost. It's rather obvious what I was doing. Take your attitude elsewhere
I mean at least he posted. He could of easily not post and you would of still called it lame. Usually negative connotations like that give off a scummy vibe as well so we can do less of.
|
On November 01 2017 14:55 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 13:49 ShoCkeyy wrote:
I mean at least he posted. He could of easily not post and you would of still called it lame. Usually negative connotations like that give off a scummy vibe as well so we can do less of. what are you saying here? That darth is calling me scum and we could do less of that? or that darth calling me scum is scummy and we could do less of that?
Did you read what I even posted? Wtf are you going on about? I wasn't even talking to you....
|
On November 01 2017 21:32 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 20:03 ShoCkeyy wrote:On November 01 2017 14:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 01 2017 13:49 ShoCkeyy wrote:
I mean at least he posted. He could of easily not post and you would of still called it lame. Usually negative connotations like that give off a scummy vibe as well so we can do less of. what are you saying here? That darth is calling me scum and we could do less of that? or that darth calling me scum is scummy and we could do less of that? Did you read what I even posted? Wtf are you going on about? I wasn't even talking to you.... are you saying df is not scum for posting?? I’m confused as well
I don't think I should have to explain myself, but definitely not... DF was calling Ruxxar's post lame, and I just said its better that he posted rather than not. I mean I don't think it's that hard to understand what I meant if people actually read before replying.
So far DF, Damerian and Oats are on my watch list. Conversion is halfway there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
