|
Also for some reason rux's vote is on Vivax?!?
|
Also his earlier comments on damerion are textbook wishy-washy scum keeping his options open
|
Also he's mafia, just lynch him man.
|
On November 03 2017 05:11 darthfoley wrote:You might be right about this, but I think ruxxar is the safer bet. @Oats all of Vivax's filter is super bland and opportunistic. His two scum reads were me, who at the time had a lot of pressure, and Shockey, who's uber lynch bait and also had thread sentiment against him. He never provided any town reads, and his reasons for scum reading us were either non-existent or just regurgitating other people's ideas. Sure it's 3 posts, but they're bad posts.
Meh, I thought shoockey was mafia on my first read through. Also thought you were mafia.
Soooo I kinda don't think he's scum.
Townreada are overrated
|
Deadline in 1h 45 min right?
|
On November 03 2017 05:15 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 05:13 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 03 2017 05:11 darthfoley wrote:On November 03 2017 05:00 Holyflare wrote:
Vivax mafia though You might be right about this, but I think ruxxar is the safer bet. @Oats all of Vivax's filter is super bland and opportunistic. His two scum reads were me, who at the time had a lot of pressure, and Shockey, who's uber lynch bait and also had thread sentiment against him. He never provided any town reads, and his reasons for scum reading us were either non-existent or just regurgitating other people's ideas. Sure it's 3 posts, but they're bad posts. Meh, I thought shoockey was mafia on my first read through. Also thought you were mafia. Soooo I kinda don't think he's scum. Townreada are overrated Yea I've never subscribed to the whole "i'm gonna find town and then PoE" strategy. Idk, Vivax being the fifth person to put me at #1 scum just doesn't sit right. Also his activity compared to the other mafia game going on according to HF. Might be a lame reason to read someone scum, but oh well
He has no activity in that game too lol
|
On November 03 2017 05:17 darthfoley wrote:
So it's like 3-3-2 with Shockey-Ruxxar-Me? TT having only one vote after 3-4 people have been shitting on him is mighty mighty interesting.
I mean, rux voted Vivax randomly, and it's me and you shitting on TICKTOC soooo eyeah
|
On November 03 2017 05:22 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 05:18 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 03 2017 05:17 darthfoley wrote:
So it's like 3-3-2 with Shockey-Ruxxar-Me? TT having only one vote after 3-4 people have been shitting on him is mighty mighty interesting. I mean, rux voted Vivax randomly, and it's me and you shitting on TICKTOC soooo eyeah I thought Ruxx, Damdred, and 1-2 others were talking about how TT is bad? HF too, no?
Yeah possibly, can't really say anything about them not voting for TT when I don't want to lynch him today either lol.
Don't really think it's that important.
I much rather lunch rux today
|
On November 03 2017 05:27 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 04:34 Damerion wrote:On November 03 2017 04:30 ruXxar wrote:On November 03 2017 03:44 Damerion wrote:
Hello,
I just woke up from my shift. As such I obviously have a lot of catching uo to do.
I have been trying to keep up with the thread right now and I am in the neighborhood of scum being in these five people.
Shockey/RuxXar/Ticktock/Zen
The fifth person I do not want to say quite yet as I do not want the gane to develop into a war if I am wrong.
But I feel like at least two mafia are in this group listed.
And as I filter dive I will place my vote on Shockey as a place holder. Can I hear your opinion on ticktock and zen? In the moat concise way possible, Very little interaction between either of them. Zen made a rather large post that has enabled him to hide in the aether. Both are very sideline characters not involved in the lynch, and really there posts are mostly surface level things that come from skimming the thread. Overall I would say tt is a 6/10 read and zen is slightly stronger at 7/10. Shockeyy filter is mafia oriented still I believe. So why is zen scummy for doing that when you literally made 1 post on shockeyy and afkd? What makes him mafia and not just afk? 7/10 is so strong.
Its different when other people do it!
|
On November 03 2017 05:27 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 04:34 Damerion wrote:On November 03 2017 04:30 ruXxar wrote:On November 03 2017 03:44 Damerion wrote:
Hello,
I just woke up from my shift. As such I obviously have a lot of catching uo to do.
I have been trying to keep up with the thread right now and I am in the neighborhood of scum being in these five people.
Shockey/RuxXar/Ticktock/Zen
The fifth person I do not want to say quite yet as I do not want the gane to develop into a war if I am wrong.
But I feel like at least two mafia are in this group listed.
And as I filter dive I will place my vote on Shockey as a place holder. Can I hear your opinion on ticktock and zen? In the moat concise way possible, Very little interaction between either of them. Zen made a rather large post that has enabled him to hide in the aether. Both are very sideline characters not involved in the lynch, and really there posts are mostly surface level things that come from skimming the thread. Overall I would say tt is a 6/10 read and zen is slightly stronger at 7/10. Shockeyy filter is mafia oriented still I believe. So why is zen scummy for doing that when you literally made 1 post on shockeyy and afkd? What makes him mafia and not just afk? 7/10 is so strong.
Lynch rux?
|
On November 03 2017 05:35 Vivax wrote:
Coppola already called, he wants a movie with shockey as the protagonist cause he's so scum
Do you think rux is mafia?
|
On November 03 2017 05:42 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 05:40 Damerion wrote:
Before I head out I will say a couple of things.
Your correct in that it is hypocritical in the way I read people for fitting in with little effort. But juat because I also fit the profile does not mean that others also do not fit that criteria.
Making snide comments does not change the fact that my assessment is correct even if I have to fit the criteria myself.
Secondly I will not say that we should lynch Shockeyy today, he has been one if the more polarizing figures in d1, and it does feel at this point like scum are pretty ok with the lynch.
I really enjoy ny thoughts that Zen+Ticktock+one is the current team I am working with.
I believe we should lynch Ticktock with Damdred today, also its possibke RuxXar is the third with how he was ok with Ticktock but then switched when it was possible ticktock could be lynched.
I'm still going to lynch tick tock. I just wanted to get vivax playing.
Clearly ninja voting him was totally gonna get him to play^^
|
On November 03 2017 05:44 Tictock wrote:We had a late lynch rush at my morning job so I have shit for time today, basically just the next half hour and I need to eat lunch in that time as well. No time for filters, just gunna skim a bit. This caught my eye: Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 01:32 ShoCkeyy wrote:On November 03 2017 01:19 Tictock wrote:On November 03 2017 00:20 ShoCkeyy wrote:
I feel a bit odd about TT too, as some one who understands the amount of hours worked, I wouldn't come in posting my thoughts after each person's post in the thread, this caused him to change his view on the game all the time, something I feel like scum wouldn't even care about anyways.
I would of gathered my thoughts first on the overall conversation, and then provide quick bullets on each of the topics i wanted to discuss; Zen's big post here. I felt like TT was just trying to string together posts after each response in the thread to make it look like he was active, while letting his scum buddies do the rest when he's not available. This is literally how I play every game. I like to respond to things as soon as I read them else I feel like I will have a harder time recalling things later on. And yes I always get called out for it as well. And how many of those times were you actually scum? I'm not voting for you yet cause that's not an indication that you can be scum, but it definitely leans towards it. I don't care much for why you're voting for me, but if you're thinking I'm scum over the others that are very likely to be scum, then you obviously see the game differently. First, in response. Hardly any, I think? I haven't been playing much mafia and I've only rolled Town in the past year. Probably an easy thing to check via the database. Second, it occurres to me that scum!Shokey has everything to gain by pushing me here when there is clearly several people scum reading me and he is in danger of being lynched ATM. ##UnvoteGunna put my vote on DF and try to catch up.
Put your vote.on rux
|
On November 03 2017 05:44 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 10:39 Tictock wrote:On November 01 2017 09:20 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 09:08 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 09:05 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:59 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:57 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:53 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:
[quote]
You have good reads, I'll give you that.
You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. nah actually I'm willing to blind follow you 100% after the last 2 games you're not as good this game though so that's weird.also I never trust HF because he is a "big name" so that's a bad point What’s that supposed to mean??? oi don't red text me m8 he just seems weird throwing out all these soft reads. his usual play has been slam down hard with a big read that calls out 2/3 or 3/3 scum, but idk. maybe he's trying to be more active b/c he died last game because of it, but I don't like it You’re saying he’s not as good when no one has flipped yet. It doesn’t make sense in the context you’re trying to appropriate to him. You’re trying to measure his “good play” based on his posts rather than the result of his reads. If his previous games reads had all been wrong, then you wouldn’t be calling his big read posts good. Like.. I don’t see where you’re coming from. it's what HF said before, why change up your playstyle when nothing was wrong with it to begin with? the only reason I can think of is he wants to avoid being lynched b/c of activity again, so he tries to throw out soft reads by looking active. I don't like that if his big read posts in the previous games were off, then I can see why he's trying to change his playstyle I don't think I'm being unclear, and have no idea why you're nitpicking at the point, so make that two of us that don't understand each other Also, how is his read soft? He straight up called shockey mafia, voted for him and asked people to follow him. It scares me how much I find myself agreeing with Ruxx this game. I can't exactly word why but this post comes from town 90 % of the time. It simply is a genuine approach to the game. Not voting TT.
Vote rux you asshole
|
This is all why rux is mafia guys
|
It's interesting that he doesn't engage me anymore though
|
On November 03 2017 05:50 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 05:47 Oatsmaster wrote:
It's interesting that he doesn't engage me anymore though Who? Also notice how Vixax has pivoted off of me when thread sentiment did so
Rux.
Again mehhh
|
On November 03 2017 05:52 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 05:51 ruXxar wrote:On November 03 2017 05:48 Vivax wrote:On November 01 2017 23:19 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 22:55 happykrogan wrote:On November 01 2017 22:37 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:36 Conversion wrote:
the problemI have with the scumread of “DF is attacking anyone possible” is that he could have just saved himself the effort and pushed me exactly how he pushed me last game and most likely started a wagon. my play hasn’t differed too wildly (as pointed out by krogan), so why would he waste time throwing shade at other people when he has two very good lynch targets he can focus on (me/shockey) EBWOP The best explanation I can think of right now is that he doesn't want to follow thread sentiment because it could cause problems later in the game. All my spermicidal evidence gathered suggests that tunneling is a town trait rather than a scum trait. On November 01 2017 23:19 ruXxar wrote:
Empirical* WTF LOL One of my finer moments. I'm surprised you were the first to notice. Possibly everyone calling you scum didn't even read your filter then. I'm still in the process of.
Possibly the multiple lies and getting caught making up stuff distracted me
|
On November 03 2017 06:00 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 09:45 ShoCkeyy wrote:
Look at that, I got two almost three pages worth of info out of my one little measly post.
Still haven't seen these people post either:
4. The_Zen_Man
5. Oatsmaster
10. Breshke
12. Vivax
13. Tictock
So we'd still have to wait till they show up. What info did Shockey get? What's the point of listing all nonposters besides trying to look helpful. Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 12:00 ShoCkeyy wrote:On November 01 2017 11:43 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 11:39 ShoCkeyy wrote:I mean the game just started, there is nothing to really post about other than Conversion getting triggered about being "grilled"... I also posted the list because I mentioned it's too early to even try to vote because these "list" haven't posted yet. I haven't really played with any of you other than Holy, Damred, Vivax, and what may be Oatsmaster (but I don't recall). So I'm still just poking around and seeing what comes out of what. I don't mind taking the fall for now until some one slips, cause it's what I usually do. So far those who are "suspicious" of me, one of them have a good chance at being scum  So what are your thoughts on me getting triggered? I especially liked DF's posts on Ruxx and his response to being questioned. What's your thoughts on that? Meh... too me it's fluff. On November 01 2017 11:10 darthfoley wrote:On November 01 2017 08:49 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:02 Damerion wrote:
##vote ShoCkeyy[/b
I ask and expect you all to follow me on this.
@Damdred especially you. Slow down hotshot. When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. Name recognition help for sure, but it’s also about how you present yourself and your arguments. Perfect example is Lonelyclock last game. A newbie, but very solid town-read with a lot of credibility. Someone presenting themselves like that pushes a lot of weight around. Don’t get me wrong, I like your more confident approach, but it’s throwing me off because it’s so different from previous games, and it’s also a bit too much over the top and appears a bit forced. I dislike ruxxar's early game filter. Super fluff with no substance. Yea, sure, lots of people are posting fluff kinda. But ruxxar's gives me the vibes of feigning activity to seem interested. It's pretty easy to do early game especially, when people are dicking about. Besides that, I have no idea why he feels the need to dictate how Damerion votes, the aggressiveness of his vote, and the subsequent commentary Let me break down the bolded sentence for you 1) "Don't get me wrong" = apologetic, not trying to tread on anyone's toes, like scumversion last game 2) "I like your more confident approach" implies a town lean of some sort, with buddy potential 3) So he likes the confident approach, BUT it's throwing him off because it's so different from last game. So you like it... but it's throwing you off? 4) It's also "a bit too much over the top and feels forced" implying it's scummy. So to conclude, Ruxxar likes Damerion's aggressive and confident play even though it's throwing him off but it's over the top and feels forced. So why do you like the approach if you are going to call it scummy one line later? This is a whole lot of nothing burger I can kinda understand ruxxar questioning Damerion's reason to vote so early, and it's not that he's dictating, he's just saying to take it slow. I think this post clearly explains Ruxxar's thinking. [B]On November 01 2017 09:20 ruXxar wrote: On November 01 2017 09:08 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 09:05 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:59 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:57 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:53 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:
[quote]
You have good reads, I'll give you that.
You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. nah actually I'm willing to blind follow you 100% after the last 2 games you're not as good this game though so that's weird.also I never trust HF because he is a "big name" so that's a bad point What’s that supposed to mean??? oi don't red text me m8 he just seems weird throwing out all these soft reads. his usual play has been slam down hard with a big read that calls out 2/3 or 3/3 scum, but idk. maybe he's trying to be more active b/c he died last game because of it, but I don't like it You’re saying he’s not as good when no one has flipped yet. It doesn’t make sense in the context you’re trying to appropriate to him. You’re trying to measure his “good play” based on his posts rather than the result of his reads. If his previous games reads had all been wrong, then you wouldn’t be calling his big read posts good. Like.. I don’t see where you’re coming from. it's what HF said before, why change up your playstyle when nothing was wrong with it to begin with? the only reason I can think of is he wants to avoid being lynched b/c of activity again, so he tries to throw out soft reads by looking active. I don't like that if his big read posts in the previous games were off, then I can see why he's trying to change his playstyle I don't think I'm being unclear, and have no idea why you're nitpicking at the point, so make that two of us that don't understand each other Also, how is his read soft? He straight up called shockey mafia, voted for him and asked people to follow him. [b] I know I post like shit, but I do it for a reason, it's easy to be able to see who jumps on the "vote shockeyy" bandwagon, and of course one of the mafia members is easily going to jump on it, if not two cause my posting is so "shitty". Damerian is trying to use his credibility from his past two games to try and have a following into voting some one off easily. It's kinda scummy in my opinion. He even admits looking scummy and justifies it with doing it on purpose. Also no explanation whatsoever why Damerion shouldn't have done what he did as town. If I was right on 3/3 mafias last game, obviously I'm going to expect people to follow my opinion. Shockey tries to turn it into something scummy. Should I even go on? This guy screams mafia all over.
You aren't going to convince me that he's scummier than rux who literally lied today.
|
On November 03 2017 05:52 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2017 05:49 darthfoley wrote:On November 03 2017 05:42 ruXxar wrote:On November 03 2017 05:40 Damerion wrote:
Before I head out I will say a couple of things.
Your correct in that it is hypocritical in the way I read people for fitting in with little effort. But juat because I also fit the profile does not mean that others also do not fit that criteria.
Making snide comments does not change the fact that my assessment is correct even if I have to fit the criteria myself.
Secondly I will not say that we should lynch Shockeyy today, he has been one if the more polarizing figures in d1, and it does feel at this point like scum are pretty ok with the lynch.
I really enjoy ny thoughts that Zen+Ticktock+one is the current team I am working with.
I believe we should lynch Ticktock with Damdred today, also its possibke RuxXar is the third with how he was ok with Ticktock but then switched when it was possible ticktock could be lynched.
I'm still going to lynch tick tock. I just wanted to get vivax playing. Never understood the whole "I'm voting for this person and telling them I'm pressuring them, not because I think they're mafia strategy" Might as well play poker and show your hand to the whole table If it works it works. Don't hater the player, hate the game.
But it doesn't???!?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
