|
On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:02 Damerion wrote: [b]##vote ShoCkeyy[/b
I ask and expect you all to follow me on this.
@Damdred especially you. Slow down hotshot. When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team?
You're only as good as your last game.
|
On November 01 2017 08:22 ShoCkeyy wrote: My last game was a long time ago. What does that say about me?
That you're scum.
|
Nah, I don't have any scum reads right now. But you're pretty close.
|
On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:02 Damerion wrote: [b]##vote ShoCkeyy[/b
I ask and expect you all to follow me on this.
@Damdred especially you. Slow down hotshot. When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team?
You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing.
|
On November 01 2017 08:28 Holyflare wrote: ##vote Damerion
Mmm. I have mixed feelings about this.
|
Where is the voting thread?
|
On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:02 Damerion wrote: [b]##vote ShoCkeyy[/b
I ask and expect you all to follow me on this.
@Damdred especially you. Slow down hotshot. When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point.
Name recognition help for sure, but it’s also about how you present yourself and your arguments.
Perfect example is Lonelyclock last game. A newbie, but very solid town-read with a lot of credibility. Someone presenting themselves like that pushes a lot of weight around.
Don’t get me wrong, I like your more confident approach, but it’s throwing me off because it’s so different from previous games, and it’s also a bit too much over the top and appears a bit forced.
|
What I’m trying to get at is if this is a one time thing or if this is the new confident you.
I’ll admit im a bit excited by the prospect.
|
On November 01 2017 08:53 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:02 Damerion wrote: [b]##vote ShoCkeyy[/b
I ask and expect you all to follow me on this.
@Damdred especially you. Slow down hotshot. When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. nah actually I'm willing to blind follow you 100% after the last 2 games you're not as good this game though so that's weird.also I never trust HF because he is a "big name" so that's a bad point What’s that supposed to mean???
|
On November 01 2017 08:59 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 08:57 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:53 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:02 Damerion wrote: [b]##vote ShoCkeyy[/b
I ask and expect you all to follow me on this.
@Damdred especially you. Slow down hotshot. When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. nah actually I'm willing to blind follow you 100% after the last 2 games you're not as good this game though so that's weird.also I never trust HF because he is a "big name" so that's a bad point What’s that supposed to mean??? oi don't red text me m8 he just seems weird throwing out all these soft reads. his usual play has been slam down hard with a big read that calls out 2/3 or 3/3 scum, but idk. maybe he's trying to be more active b/c he died last game because of it, but I don't like it
You’re saying he’s not as good when no one has flipped yet. It doesn’t make sense in the context you’re trying to appropriate to him.
You’re trying to measure his “good play” based on his posts rather than the result of his reads.
If his previous games reads had all been wrong, then you wouldn’t be calling his big read posts good.
Like.. I don’t see where you’re coming from.
|
On November 01 2017 09:08 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 09:05 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:59 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:57 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:53 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:02 Damerion wrote: [b]##vote ShoCkeyy[/b
I ask and expect you all to follow me on this.
@Damdred especially you. Slow down hotshot. When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. nah actually I'm willing to blind follow you 100% after the last 2 games you're not as good this game though so that's weird.also I never trust HF because he is a "big name" so that's a bad point What’s that supposed to mean??? oi don't red text me m8 he just seems weird throwing out all these soft reads. his usual play has been slam down hard with a big read that calls out 2/3 or 3/3 scum, but idk. maybe he's trying to be more active b/c he died last game because of it, but I don't like it You’re saying he’s not as good when no one has flipped yet. It doesn’t make sense in the context you’re trying to appropriate to him. You’re trying to measure his “good play” based on his posts rather than the result of his reads. If his previous games reads had all been wrong, then you wouldn’t be calling his big read posts good. Like.. I don’t see where you’re coming from. it's what HF said before, why change up your playstyle when nothing was wrong with it to begin with? the only reason I can think of is he wants to avoid being lynched b/c of activity again, so he tries to throw out soft reads by looking active. I don't like that if his big read posts in the previous games were off, then I can see why he's trying to change his playstyle I don't think I'm being unclear, and have no idea why you're nitpicking at the point, so make that two of us that don't understand each other
Nothing wrong with his play style? He didn’t get his scum reads lynched. He got lynched himself for being scummy. Yes there is something that he can do better with his play style.
Also dont put words in holy flares mouth to lean yourself on.
He did not say that there was “nothing wrong” with damerion a play style.
|
On November 01 2017 09:08 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 09:05 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:59 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:57 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:53 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:02 Damerion wrote: [b]##vote ShoCkeyy[/b
I ask and expect you all to follow me on this.
@Damdred especially you. Slow down hotshot. When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. nah actually I'm willing to blind follow you 100% after the last 2 games you're not as good this game though so that's weird.also I never trust HF because he is a "big name" so that's a bad point What’s that supposed to mean??? oi don't red text me m8 he just seems weird throwing out all these soft reads. his usual play has been slam down hard with a big read that calls out 2/3 or 3/3 scum, but idk. maybe he's trying to be more active b/c he died last game because of it, but I don't like it You’re saying he’s not as good when no one has flipped yet. It doesn’t make sense in the context you’re trying to appropriate to him. You’re trying to measure his “good play” based on his posts rather than the result of his reads. If his previous games reads had all been wrong, then you wouldn’t be calling his big read posts good. Like.. I don’t see where you’re coming from. it's what HF said before, why change up your playstyle when nothing was wrong with it to begin with? the only reason I can think of is he wants to avoid being lynched b/c of activity again, so he tries to throw out soft reads by looking active. I don't like that if his big read posts in the previous games were off, then I can see why he's trying to change his playstyle I don't think I'm being unclear, and have no idea why you're nitpicking at the point, so make that two of us that don't understand each other
Also, how is his read soft? He straight up called shockey mafia, voted for him and asked people to follow him.
|
On November 01 2017 09:23 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On October 15 2017 00:45 Holyflare wrote: You might say that "oh hf but he already said he's finding town this game instead of looking for scummy things that's why it's different!" but without talking about ongoing games he did very well with the previous strategy so I don't see a need to change it up at all. I'm not putting words in HF's mouth-- he has like 2 posts so far, why did you think I was talking about this game
You’re gonna quote a post that’s half a month? Get out of here.
|
On November 01 2017 09:30 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 09:29 Holyflare wrote:On November 01 2017 09:26 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 09:25 Holyflare wrote: That's a quote from last game ... Where he was town? .. and? your line of thinking was that he was scum from it the entire god damn game? lol Yes, but it was wrong because he was town AND changing his play style. Now you are suggesting he is mafia for changing his play style and saying it's scummy for the reasons in my quote that were wrong. I don't like it != he is mafia ??????
You’re trying to use holyflare to give credibility to your argument when the point of his you’re leaning on was wrong and is irrelevant here.
|
On November 01 2017 11:10 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 08:49 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:02 Damerion wrote: ##vote ShoCkeyy[/b
I ask and expect you all to follow me on this.
@Damdred especially you. Slow down hotshot. When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. Name recognition help for sure, but it’s also about how you present yourself and your arguments. Perfect example is Lonelyclock last game. A newbie, but very solid town-read with a lot of credibility. Someone presenting themselves like that pushes a lot of weight around. [b]Don’t get me wrong, I like your more confident approach, but it’s throwing me off because it’s so different from previous games, and it’s also a bit too much over the top and appears a bit forced. I dislike ruxxar's early game filter. Super fluff with no substance. Yea, sure, lots of people are posting fluff kinda. But ruxxar's gives me the vibes of feigning activity to seem interested. It's pretty easy to do early game especially, when people are dicking about. Besides that, I have no idea why he feels the need to dictate how Damerion votes, the aggressiveness of his vote, and the subsequent commentary Let me break down the bolded sentence for you 1) "Don't get me wrong" = apologetic, not trying to tread on anyone's toes, like scumversion last game 2) "I like your more confident approach" implies a town lean of some sort, with buddy potential 3) So he likes the confident approach, BUT it's throwing him off because it's so different from last game. So you like it... but it's throwing you off? 4) It's also "a bit too much over the top and feels forced" implying it's scummy. So to conclude, Ruxxar likes Damerion's aggressive and confident play even though it's throwing him off but it's over the top and feels forced. So why do you like the approach if you are going to call it scummy one line later? This is a whole lot of nothing burger
You're trying way too hard to make something out of nothing. It's like those school classes where you read a text and you are trying to interpret every single word. It's just a whole lot of bullshit.
I also agree with krogans point that you seem to be looking for any reason to attack anyone.
|
On November 01 2017 09:33 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 09:31 Holyflare wrote: So your read is entirely irrelevant but you've been defending it for no reason? Why bother defending the notion that his play style has changed if it means nothing to you?? I'm defending it because it's completely inane to debate something so irrelevant and it's mind boggling that any of you think this is productive
I'm voting conversion until he admits his point about HF was wrong and that defending it was stupid. No hard feelings.
|
On November 01 2017 22:36 Conversion wrote: the problem I have with DF is attacking anyone possible is that he could have just saved himself the effort and pushed me exactly how he pushed me last game and most likely started a wagon. my play hasn’t differed too wildly (as pointed out by krogan), so why would he waste time throwing shade at other people when he has two very good lynch targets he can focus on (me/shockey)
Because pushing you hard if he knows you are town are not going to reflect well on him.
|
On November 01 2017 22:55 happykrogan wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 22:37 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:36 Conversion wrote: the problemI have with the scumread of “DF is attacking anyone possible” is that he could have just saved himself the effort and pushed me exactly how he pushed me last game and most likely started a wagon. my play hasn’t differed too wildly (as pointed out by krogan), so why would he waste time throwing shade at other people when he has two very good lynch targets he can focus on (me/shockey) EBWOP The best explanation I can think of right now is that he doesn't want to follow thread sentiment because it could cause problems later in the game.
All my spermicidal evidence gathered suggests that tunneling is a town trait rather than a scum trait.
|
|
I also quoted the wrong post.
What I mean to say is that DF playing different this game is more a sign of him being a different alignment than the same alignment.
|
|
|
|