|
On May 11 2017 06:51 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2017 17:53 Grackaroni wrote:On May 07 2017 01:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:On May 06 2017 15:29 fuba wrote: Now I'm really afraid of rolling scum :S You shouldn't, me Palmar and Holyflare will fuck up and kill each other and you'll just cruise to victory.  We seem to be right on track here atm. I think we should all just chill out a little bit. In comparison to Grackaroni thread warrior that never drops anything, Grackaroni subservient thread cop is a stark contrast. lol I was trying to help you because it seemed like he was only voting you because you voted him.
|
He was already fine with me at that point too.
But feel free to quote me having no follow up and leaving the thread.\
It didn't happen as you say it happened, so it may take a while.
|
Do you like what Palmar has contributed so far?
|
On May 11 2017 06:57 Holyflare wrote: My point of view is that rayn didn't like what you said and you had a massive boring snoozefest that I didn't read where you explained your post multiple times and rayn no doubt used dumb analogies to try and get his point across. You just repeatedly explained yourself and had no bite back and didn't even bother getting into my points on rayn. You were having an argument with rayn for the sake of having an argument rather than figuring it out with other people even though they were present.
Then rayn stopped pushing you and you didn't care and you did nothing more and qq left when palmar insulted you. I think the point here is that you have the red banana and everybody knows it.
|
Palmar and DF have been making opposite points.
Palmar says I was being too prickly to Rayn
DF says I wasn't being prickly enough with Rayn
You like both of their contributions because they both dislike me?
|
lol I g2g.
I'll be back to finish this later.
But I totes didn't have no follow up and leave the thread.
|
On May 11 2017 07:02 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2017 07:00 Grackaroni wrote: Palmar and DF have been making opposite points.
Palmar says I was being too prickly to Rayn
DF says I wasn't being prickly enough with Rayn
You like both of their contributions because they both dislike me? Actually i'm curious what do you make of Palmar and DF having the exact opposite conclusions at this point about that interaction. Do you think there is some sort of connection in review? Or? No I think it's just been the most polarizing event in thread and people make different conclusions. I don't really think you can agree with both points, however.
|
On May 11 2017 07:04 Holyflare wrote: That's not true. Palmar said you're prodding rayn (pointless fight with pointless questions) when what you wrote suggests you town read rayn.
DF says you have no backbone and aren't actually fighting, which is true because you were pointlessly submissive and not actually determining his alignment.
Both independently good points. Opposites.
|
|
^
Bad posts. No relevant content to add at all.
Noted.
|
That was meant for Palmar
|
On May 11 2017 09:38 Tumblewood wrote: ok that last bit wasn't quite true but it is true that all of his non-df analysis is predicated on him not understanding obvious jokes Is he the one that thinks your LS post was too serious?
|
Palmar you don't understand the Rayn argument. But w/e, I think your read is probably not faked.
|
On May 11 2017 21:45 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2017 21:41 Grackaroni wrote: Palmar you don't understand the Rayn argument. But w/e, I think your read is probably not faked. explain then I tried to explain the timeline to you earlier and then you gave me an asshole response.
|
Rereading, I also don't actually think any of DF's posts are bad posts. I just called him out because he was one of the people attacking me.
|
On May 11 2017 21:51 Palmar wrote: hah nailed you non-explaining scummerino You think you're getting reads from doing shit like this but they're actually terrible.
|
I would rate this post as 40% accurate. My read on Rayn has been pretty well documented throughout the thread. I guarantee he would call me out if things were actually as you describe.
On May 11 2017 21:07 Palmar wrote:
Additionally Grack's implied read on rayn was very inconsistent
he went from quoting himself in a post along with people who voted for rayn (implies grack believes rayn = scum) to calling rayn's posts rage induced tunnel (implies grack believes rayn = town) to making a "this is fishy" post against rayn (implies grack believes rayn = scum)
to whatever his position is right now (is he voting rayn? has he ever voted rayn?)
|
Palmar, do you remember Koshi and the HAHAs?
|
|
On May 11 2017 22:14 raynpelikoneet wrote: We should lynch darthfoley. And its quite weird Palmar doesnt understand how "timelinewise" Grackaronis posts regarding his stance on me make perfect sense. I'm thinking we should lynch Damdred
|
|
|
|