|
On October 04 2016 21:44 Calix wrote:Actually I'm calling bullshit here. NU says that 'what I have seen from you so far does not strike me as odd' Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:36 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:32 Calix wrote:
Legit question. Are you actually scum-reading me?
You've made some mocking comments and "oh XYZ bullshit reason concerns me" and even agreed with me on a point or two but you have not actually said "I think Calix is scummy" or called anything I've done scummy...just questionable. I town-read you. What I have seen from you so far does not strike me as odd. I agreed with Oats' comment on you because I could understand where he was coming from. Not knowing you're Hypocrisy Incarnate, he could not know that your comments about me making fluff posts were NAI. Capiche? ...yet he makes these posts in his catch-up where he clearly has concerns and doubts about my posts. This strikes me as inconsistent. Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 20:44 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 15:40 Holyflare wrote:
nEVERuNLUCKY probably bs confirmed himself town and koshi is either abusing it and bsing or is also town. Calix bad or mafia for even voting that way.
More wishy washy statements on koshi to come. I see what you did with my name, lul. I'm concerned that Calix didn't question my BS confirm. She just went along with it and called me bad. Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:02 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. For the sake of argument, why would he try force a read on the one person who can most easily rebut him ? She can claim that she knows my play and get others to lynch me. Doesn't matter if I can rebut her, as long as the others trust her voice over mine. I don't really understand why you ask this question. Power Wolfs do this all the time. There isn't really a 'why'. Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:31 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:07 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. So you're arguing that I am pushing a read onto someone who I claim has obvious town/ scum meta. Let's just indulge in this delusion and pretend that I'm scum and let's assume that you're town...since this push makes no sense for two of the scum to do. I decide to make a lame push on you based on the question. People start to town-read you for your question. I pop in and double down on my push, thus drawing a shit-load of attention to myself. Even if I mislynched you, I would look exceptionally bad for mislynching someone that I claim has "obvious town/ scum meta" So what exactly does scum!Calix get out of doing this, exactly? Inquiring minds want to know. Put that way my point looks dumb. Still feel uneasy about you saying I look for shortcuts often (NAI)and associating a scum-read to it. I don't even know what shortcuts you are referring to.
Where is the contradiction?
Your posts don't strike me as odd AI-wise, but I am concerned with the points you are missing.
|
On October 04 2016 21:45 Oatsmaster wrote:
Lol wtf you guys played like less than 10 games together and profess to be able to read each other one post into the game, come on man.
6 games together, 7 games if you count the game she coached me.
She never said she was "able to read [me] one post into the game". Neither have I. Where did you get this from? All she said is that I was an easy read for her (which, again, is not necessarily true) and that I always was the first one lynched as mafia.
I don't make anything out of this. Calix is just that person with a massive ego. While she is as tall as Peter Dinklage IRL, her ego is as big as Robert Downey Jr.
Calix that's really soft. Why can't I vote for superbia? Am I gonna lose my vote? No. Am I free to vote again? Yes.
That is not what she said.
You are contradicting yourself by saying that Calix appears scummy to you, yet, you vote Superbia whom you made no comment on.
So why is my vote even alignment indicative when there are still more than 24 hours to Lynch?
I would like to hear this.
Really, really, really defensive here. Calix never said your vote was AI.
3 "reality twists" in one post.
|
On October 04 2016 21:49 batsnacks wrote:
NU why does Calix's things strike you as town things are you just saying that to look tough
Ugh, you won't like my explanation. I'm bad at defending town-reads.
Tone. Confidence. Not-scummy.
|
On October 04 2016 21:51 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:47 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:44 Calix wrote:Actually I'm calling bullshit here. NU says that 'what I have seen from you so far does not strike me as odd' On October 04 2016 21:36 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:32 Calix wrote:
Legit question. Are you actually scum-reading me?
You've made some mocking comments and "oh XYZ bullshit reason concerns me" and even agreed with me on a point or two but you have not actually said "I think Calix is scummy" or called anything I've done scummy...just questionable. I town-read you. What I have seen from you so far does not strike me as odd. I agreed with Oats' comment on you because I could understand where he was coming from. Not knowing you're Hypocrisy Incarnate, he could not know that your comments about me making fluff posts were NAI. Capiche? ...yet he makes these posts in his catch-up where he clearly has concerns and doubts about my posts. This strikes me as inconsistent. On October 04 2016 20:44 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 15:40 Holyflare wrote:
nEVERuNLUCKY probably bs confirmed himself town and koshi is either abusing it and bsing or is also town. Calix bad or mafia for even voting that way.
More wishy washy statements on koshi to come. I see what you did with my name, lul. I'm concerned that Calix didn't question my BS confirm. She just went along with it and called me bad. On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. On October 04 2016 21:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:02 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. For the sake of argument, why would he try force a read on the one person who can most easily rebut him ? She can claim that she knows my play and get others to lynch me. Doesn't matter if I can rebut her, as long as the others trust her voice over mine. I don't really understand why you ask this question. Power Wolfs do this all the time. There isn't really a 'why'. On October 04 2016 21:31 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:07 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. So you're arguing that I am pushing a read onto someone who I claim has obvious town/ scum meta. Let's just indulge in this delusion and pretend that I'm scum and let's assume that you're town...since this push makes no sense for two of the scum to do. I decide to make a lame push on you based on the question. People start to town-read you for your question. I pop in and double down on my push, thus drawing a shit-load of attention to myself. Even if I mislynched you, I would look exceptionally bad for mislynching someone that I claim has "obvious town/ scum meta" So what exactly does scum!Calix get out of doing this, exactly? Inquiring minds want to know. Put that way my point looks dumb. Still feel uneasy about you saying I look for shortcuts often (NAI)and associating a scum-read to it. I don't even know what shortcuts you are referring to. Where is the contradiction? Your posts don't strike me as odd AI-wise, but I am concerned with the points you are missing. Wait, so your posts where you accuse me of "forcing a read on you" and say that I "still make you uneasy" AREN'T things that you find odd???
Ah. I did contradict myself.
Well, I think you are town now. So check this:
IC 540
|
On October 04 2016 22:01 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 21:59 Calix wrote:
Anyone want Superbia to play for the game that he fucking signed up for? Or do people want him to promise to contribute but not actually bother? Btw Calix, I am curious. What was the "Superbia stole my laptop" about?
C'mon, it was a great joke. I'm disappointed you did not get it.
It was about posting one-liners in a quick succession, like you did in HM3.
|
On October 04 2016 21:58 Superbia wrote:
Anyone want spoilers yet? Or do people want to figure this game out for themselves?
If you have valuable information, spoil me by any means.
On October 04 2016 22:00 Superbia wrote:
For serious though. There's a decent meta reason why I want to stay in the sidelines (as town—but also regardless of alignment) d1.
I would like to know what reason it is that is preventing you from being useful, but if I ask and the reason is actually valid, then your "lurking.exe" program will get a runtime error. Is it something I should know?
|
On October 04 2016 22:04 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:51 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 21:47 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:44 Calix wrote:Actually I'm calling bullshit here. NU says that 'what I have seen from you so far does not strike me as odd' On October 04 2016 21:36 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:32 Calix wrote:
Legit question. Are you actually scum-reading me?
You've made some mocking comments and "oh XYZ bullshit reason concerns me" and even agreed with me on a point or two but you have not actually said "I think Calix is scummy" or called anything I've done scummy...just questionable. I town-read you. What I have seen from you so far does not strike me as odd. I agreed with Oats' comment on you because I could understand where he was coming from. Not knowing you're Hypocrisy Incarnate, he could not know that your comments about me making fluff posts were NAI. Capiche? ...yet he makes these posts in his catch-up where he clearly has concerns and doubts about my posts. This strikes me as inconsistent. On October 04 2016 20:44 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 15:40 Holyflare wrote:
nEVERuNLUCKY probably bs confirmed himself town and koshi is either abusing it and bsing or is also town. Calix bad or mafia for even voting that way.
More wishy washy statements on koshi to come. I see what you did with my name, lul. I'm concerned that Calix didn't question my BS confirm. She just went along with it and called me bad. On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. On October 04 2016 21:24 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:02 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. For the sake of argument, why would he try force a read on the one person who can most easily rebut him ? She can claim that she knows my play and get others to lynch me. Doesn't matter if I can rebut her, as long as the others trust her voice over mine. I don't really understand why you ask this question. Power Wolfs do this all the time. There isn't really a 'why'. On October 04 2016 21:31 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:07 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 21:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 19:05 Calix wrote:
This is meta-based so not air-tight by any means but nothing else strikes me as interesting so fuck it, lol. If it really was meta-based, you would not care. Fluff posting early/late d1 is NAI for me. I have done it as town and as neutral. I could be doing it as scum. You using it as an argument to call my play scummy reeks of someone trying to force a read. So you're arguing that I am pushing a read onto someone who I claim has obvious town/ scum meta. Let's just indulge in this delusion and pretend that I'm scum and let's assume that you're town...since this push makes no sense for two of the scum to do. I decide to make a lame push on you based on the question. People start to town-read you for your question. I pop in and double down on my push, thus drawing a shit-load of attention to myself. Even if I mislynched you, I would look exceptionally bad for mislynching someone that I claim has "obvious town/ scum meta" So what exactly does scum!Calix get out of doing this, exactly? Inquiring minds want to know. Put that way my point looks dumb. Still feel uneasy about you saying I look for shortcuts often (NAI)and associating a scum-read to it. I don't even know what shortcuts you are referring to. Where is the contradiction? Your posts don't strike me as odd AI-wise, but I am concerned with the points you are missing. Wait, so your posts where you accuse me of "forcing a read on you" and say that I "still make you uneasy" AREN'T things that you find odd??? Ah. I did contradict myself. Well, I think you are town now. So check this: IC 540 I thought I was town to begin with? Your progression is muddled and I don't follow it. Why are you asking me about ice cream? lmao
*giggles* I town-read you since this morning, not from the beginning.
Shucks.
lmaoooooooooo. Think of it like that thing Mesk does in her first posts as town.
|
On October 04 2016 22:09 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:07 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 21:58 Superbia wrote:
Anyone want spoilers yet? Or do people want to figure this game out for themselves? If you have valuable information, spoil me by any means. On October 04 2016 22:00 Superbia wrote:
For serious though. There's a decent meta reason why I want to stay in the sidelines (as town—but also regardless of alignment) d1. I would like to know what reason it is that is preventing you from being useful, but if I ask and the reason is actually valid, then your "lurking.exe" program will get a runtime error. Is it something I should know? How much % of the mafia team do you want?
We already have Stutters, so 66%.
|
On October 04 2016 22:11 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:10 Calix wrote:
Superbia, just spit it out instead of wasting time and posts with promising stuff -_- Wow! I am hurt.  HF. Palmar. 66.67%
Damn, you beat me with the 66%.
I do not agree with Palmar.
|
Oats is a good contender too.
|
jat I think is of the town alignment
|
Quick shitpost to make sure I have more posts than Calix.
|
On October 04 2016 22:21 Superbia wrote:
This buddying is making me a little iffy.
You want in? 
Calix, did you get the essence of the code? Would be nice to have a bond for when we town-read each other over here. Kind of like the one I have with Mesk where we speak in phonetic and broken French so that our talk cannot be translated. Hmm?
|
Another question I ask myself is why would you kill a lurker N1?
|
On October 04 2016 22:40 batsnacks wrote:
Also check out this skit I'm imagining
Mafia Calix goes after Mafia NU for dumb PM BS
People are town reading Mafia NU, Mafia Calix is going in too hard and getting heat
They buddy up and everything is suddenly fine after almost 24 hours of Calix scum reading NU for NAI reasons
Pretty good right?
Good skit. However, I think you are not giving me enough spotlight in it. You know, to make a skit successful, you have to appeal to gender codes. I propose that Mafia Calix is in so much heat that she is about to be lynched... when, suddenly, heroic Mafia NU comes to her rescue by buddying her. All of the assaillants back off the victim in fear of manly NU's wrath. Mafia NU drops Mafia Calix on a cozy hay bed on which she prays Jesus for sending NU to her rescue. Mafia NU leads charge against Town Oatsmaster who finds himself eating rope moments after.
The end.
That's a much better skit.
Sadly it's fiction as Mafia NU is not aboard the Cruise trip.
|
On October 04 2016 22:55 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:50 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:44 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:26 Calix wrote:
Like if you think that WIFOM is going to work out for you then you're going to have a bad time.
Explain yourself or eat rope. Clearly I'm coming here and trying to get superbia to actually post relevant stuff so I can get a read on him that isnt predicated on his horrible first 2 posts. To do this I don't actually need to vote in the voting thread. You guys need to get it out of your heads that voting is alignment indicative. The only place it's alignment indicative is when it's the vote to Lynch someone or to Lynch some else that djdnt actually get lynched. That's detracting from the initial issue. Nobody was objecting to a Superbia vote. We were calling you out on saying that I was scummy while voting for someone else. The fact that the person is Superbia is 0% relevant. And yes, votes are not AI unless you know what some of the flips are. Thanks mate. On October 04 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:44 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:41 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:25 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:23 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 04 2016 22:17 Calix wrote:On October 04 2016 22:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
I don't see what is there to explain calix, I want to vote for him.
I really don't see what is hard to understand man.
Same to you nu. Why the fuck is who my vote on important now.
Calix asked me why I didn't vote for her basically and she clearly thinks it's alignment indicative or else why would she ask me me about it.
What the fuck kind of logic is that? You ask questions to pry into someone's thought processes which you are STILL NOT EXPLAINING. You stated "Calix is scummy" You voted for Superbia. You did not state a scum-read on Superbia. Why the fuck are you not explaining your vote? If it's 'lul randum xD' then why are you random-voting over a scum-read? Obviously I think super is scummy and obviously I dont think it's worth explaining a read on him just yet. Can you propose a reason why I would do this as scum? Can you explain why you are doing it as town? I don't have a fucking clue what you are trying to achieve here, dude. It makes no sense to throw down a 'vote' without actually voting and then refusing to explain it, since this draws a stupid amount of attention to you, but you are also aware of this (like I was earlier) so that weakens the argument a little. So as it stands, my reasoning for both alignments is "you're an idiot" You're welcome for this incisive analysis. In your opinion, after his first 2 posts what did you read superbia as? This is going somewhere, please assist I can't help you out much, lol. I didn't have a read on him with those posts because he said he was planning on lurking on Day 1 in the pre-game so while repeating that is redundant, I just read them as generic "check-in" posts. Come on you can do better than that. So he makes generic check in posts when it's at least 10 pages of stuff he could actually comment on but he chooses not to? What does that initially say about his alignment? Why don't you just tell us what you're getting at instead of trying to prompt me into saying things for you? I can see the leading questions from a mile off. I've already said that I think those posts are NAI by themselves, the end. Spit it out or piss off. I said my point already. Im not explaining my vote because I'm not trying to get other people to vote for superbia. Is that so hard to understand? The vote is to pressure superbia and it's only for him.
Calling a vote a pressure vote kills its intent.
Do you have actual reads?
|
On October 04 2016 22:57 Oatsmaster wrote:
I really don't understand why you expect me to pour all my thoughts out into the game.
Right? People who ask others to explain themselves in a 'talking game' are completely insane!
Is it not obvious that when I vote for someone it's because I think they are scummy?
You just said it was a pressure vote...
So I have to say "xx is scummy vote xx" before voting? That's ludicrous.
Unless you don't want xx lynched, yes.
And it says absolutely nothing about my alignment. So far in this game you have proceed with 2 ridiculous pushes.
Being defensive again.
|
On October 04 2016 22:58 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 22:50 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 22:40 batsnacks wrote:
Also check out this skit I'm imagining
Mafia Calix goes after Mafia NU for dumb PM BS
People are town reading Mafia NU, Mafia Calix is going in too hard and getting heat
They buddy up and everything is suddenly fine after almost 24 hours of Calix scum reading NU for NAI reasons
Pretty good right? Good skit. However, I think you are not giving me enough spotlight in it. You know, to make a skit successful, you have to appeal to gender codes. I propose that Mafia Calix is in so much heat that she is about to be lynched... when, suddenly, heroic Mafia NU comes to her rescue by buddying her. All of the assaillants back off the victim in fear of manly NU's wrath. Mafia NU drops Mafia Calix on a cozy hay bed on which she prays Jesus for sending NU to her rescue. Mafia NU leads charge against Town Oatsmaster who finds himself eating rope moments after. The end. That's a much better skit. Sadly it's fiction as Mafia NU is not aboard the Cruise trip. So oats is town, yeah? 
He may be. If he is, I'm not ever calling myself bad again.
|
On October 04 2016 23:00 Calix wrote:
I don't know if Oats is mafia. There was one post he made a while back which I felt was kind-of town.
Other than that, I don't understand him whatsoever.
Would you kindly quote that one post?
|
On October 04 2016 23:17 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 23:02 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 22:58 batsnacks wrote:On October 04 2016 22:50 NeverUnlucky wrote:On October 04 2016 22:40 batsnacks wrote:
Also check out this skit I'm imagining
Mafia Calix goes after Mafia NU for dumb PM BS
People are town reading Mafia NU, Mafia Calix is going in too hard and getting heat
They buddy up and everything is suddenly fine after almost 24 hours of Calix scum reading NU for NAI reasons
Pretty good right? Good skit. However, I think you are not giving me enough spotlight in it. You know, to make a skit successful, you have to appeal to gender codes. I propose that Mafia Calix is in so much heat that she is about to be lynched... when, suddenly, heroic Mafia NU comes to her rescue by buddying her. All of the assaillants back off the victim in fear of manly NU's wrath. Mafia NU drops Mafia Calix on a cozy hay bed on which she prays Jesus for sending NU to her rescue. Mafia NU leads charge against Town Oatsmaster who finds himself eating rope moments after. The end. That's a much better skit. Sadly it's fiction as Mafia NU is not aboard the Cruise trip. So oats is town, yeah? He may be. If he is, I'm not ever calling myself bad again. why don't you think oats is Mafia?
Um, that's not what I think. I've him lean-scum.
What I implied in that post you quoted is that he may be town. When criticised about his Superbia vote, he did not back off. He stubbornly thought what he was doing was right which I associate with town.
Also, I feel bad for the guy. I just read that Singapore had forced military service for two years. Why though? Who would attack a 5 million people country that is 700 km (squared)?
Poor Oatsy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
