| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 22:34 justanothertownie wrote: If you seriously think Palmars response was better than mine than I question your sanity. You are scum, so you can be forgiven. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 22:35 Calix wrote: Yes, doing shit is generally a good thing. 'arbitrarily better' ??? I thought Palmar's responses were okay until Koshi pointed out the flaws in them. You also agreed with this assessment. I agreed with koshi's points on Palmar just like I agreed with jat's points on Super. Despite agreeing with them, I did not scum-read either. I pretty much voted Superbia because I agreed with jat's case even though I did not scum-read Super. I regret that. Arbitrarily better because jat's got no town tone and never proposed that his lynch was a ML nor that he was town. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 22:41 Calix wrote: NU, are you just scum-reading JAT for that comment about how "it's rare that the scummers are among the active, interested players"? Because if so, I don't even know what to say to you. No. It's a point among others. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
| ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 22:46 Oatsmaster wrote: Rephrase this lol, i dont not understand. lololol Never lynch this guy. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 22:47 Calix wrote: So...he didn't claim he was town, doesn't have 'town tone' and made a random comment about the active players. Good stuff for sure. Defense purely based on self-meta with nothing game-related. Anti-town behavior. Is Titus' smurf. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 22:48 Calix wrote: Also wait, you didn't scum-read Superbia but you agreed with the case? How does that make any sense? How do you agree with the points but not think they make Superbia scum but vote for Superbia anyway? ??? Not quite it. I agreed with the points, so I was fooled into thinking that he was scum for those points. Before that, I had Superbia in my lock-town circle and was joking around with him. I'm sure the same thing happened to you. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 22:50 Calix wrote: And why do you keep voting for people that you 'don't scum-read'? I've covered this. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 22:51 justanothertownie wrote: Once anyone brings up a game related reason for me to be mafia I will gladly defend myself against that. Those small pointers were all game-related. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 22:46 NeverUnlucky wrote: Calix, please post your list of non-lock town in order of scumminess. And defend your town-read of jat if you would be so kind. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 22:55 justanothertownie wrote: I really wasn't close to being lynched at all. And I just assumed that you do not scumread damdred since in the post before that you declared the mafia team to be me, palmar and scott. My last question is very simple. Why would I only push out side of damdred and scott as mafia? Why would I not do that as town? Look, Calix. His questions are ones that need to be answered with "WIFOM". He has no will to defend himself out of WIFOM, because WIFOM and only WIFOM make his play make sense as town. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 22:46 NeverUnlucky wrote: Calix, please post your list of non-lock town in order of scumminess. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 23:11 Oatsmaster wrote: Literally not interested in continuing this converstation. I want to lynch scott tmr k guys. You misspelled Damdred. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
I'm in the process of reading Jat's filter, and so far I like his Day One posts. Especially his early case on Grack: On October 05 2016 17:35 justanothertownie wrote: Wow, I had to read an insane amount of bullshit just now. I already told you guys I won't be around much today before the game started and this still holds true (only activity possible today will be what I can sneak in during work). So I will adress the horrendous stuff which has been posted about me and give you my lynchpool before I leave. Won't have time for much more. Let's start: How do you go from the bolded, which is entirely accurate, to me being his prefered lynch? When being agreeable is basically my bog-standard townmeta? I am literally known for this. Still mafia superbia made the same case on me in my last towngame. It is highly irritating. Literally nothing about my play changed between those posts. As if reevaluating my read on batsnacks was the slightest bit scummy. I had an impression of his game which didn't really hold up when I rechecked his filter. And as far as I know this was the only time this game where I "weakened my read". Never did I retract what I said about Palmar. I wasn't questioned either. Grack is misrepresenting what happened here. Overall this is a bullshit accusation which does not require any towny mindset to come up with. Combined with gracks lackluster play it can easily come from mafia. What does "on the ground floor" even mean? I said that calix approach was hard to understand since nu apparently is such an easy read for her. That's literally the only somewhat interesting thing about that fight and since calix was obviously really invested and out herself out there I did not think it made her mafia. The rest of your accusation is just what you said earlier already and it is probably the silliest accusation I have ever heard. If you only lynch people who do this kind of "anti town" stuff you will never win a single game as town. In fact it is so silly that I find it hard to imagine mafia batsnacks trying to attack me with it. This guy on the other hand is just making a thowaway comment on me without following up un it. He is putting me on the backburner because "I did not offend him" (what kind of bs reason is that?) - possibly because he doesn't really think I will actually get lynched. Might come from mafia. And this lil' joke: On October 05 2016 04:36 justanothertownie wrote: You could just play the game if you are town. I know - foreign concept. Might be town. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 23:18 justanothertownie wrote: I call it the neverunlucky effect. Yes, it is mostly my fault. No sarcasm. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
| ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
Jat makes some good points on Grack who seems to be back-tracking with every step Jat takes in his direction. Jat had a solid Day 1 performance from what I am seeing. Don't want to lynch him anymore. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
He was always willing to lynch Palmar though. I don't think Palmar/Grack is a thing with their interactions. Grack/Oats makes sense because they have been distantly town-reading each other. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 06 2016 21:29 justanothertownie wrote: Palmar is a pretty shit shot. You always lynch palmar and similar people who are good at defending themselves as town. Stutters is by far the best shot because he will never be readable and the day we finally get rid of him will be a complete waste with 0 information gained. What did you think of Palmar's defense? | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 09 2016 06:04 beentheredonethat wrote: Day 2: Final Vote Count
Not voting (1) - Damdred Grack CFD. Palmar and Oats on Jat for sick read. Scott ninja'd. Damdred AWOL. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm |
|
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
OSC
IPSL
Dewalt vs Bonyth
OSC
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
Patches Events
|
|
|
EPT
