[M][N] Murder on the Cruise Trip Mafia - Page 14

On October 09 2016 19:20 Calix wrote:
Palmar and Scott FTW.

Do you have anything else about your JAT read? I'm not so convinced there.

On October 09 2016 19:24 justanothertownie wrote:
Oats is probably mafia.

Can anyone tell me how the green and the red can go together in the mindset of a townie?


If you thought he could have easily flipped mafia then how on earth is it scummy for me to push his lynch? Or why would the lynch not happen without scum intervention? It doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. If you don't even think damdred is mafia then why would scum need to intervene to get the lynch off of him and onto someone else?
These 2 posts alone are full with contradictions.

The Palmar point is alright though. He had no business being right on superbia there after calling himself an acceptable lynch just before. And he also never moved his vote away from me or tried to convince anyone to lynch who he wants to be lynched.
You cannot complain afterwards if you didn't do anything about the lynch while you were clearly around at times.

On October 09 2016 20:37 justanothertownie wrote:

Can you repeat what "everyone else has said" then? If it's such a sick read that shouldn't be too hard.

On October 09 2016 20:43 justanothertownie wrote:

You mean you can't since noone really put into words why I should be mafia and you are just bullshitting right now.

On October 09 2016 20:54 Calix wrote:
Do you have any reason for wanting to lynch Scott first? lol

On October 09 2016 21:00 Oatsmaster wrote:

hes idependantly scummy, also what a retarded vote on damdred then the super sheep onto super.

Ok really going nowhere jat. Like you really think that I cant find shit in other peoples filters?
Honestly.

On October 09 2016 21:27 Calix wrote:


Naw.

On September 26 2016 07:21 Calix wrote:
In fact, scum dying Day 1 is extremely informative. It basically tells us that the mafia have to be a bunch of passive fucktards, 100% no quibbling.

"But Calix, what if there was some WIFOM9000 bussing plan?" - No. Allow me to explain the logic:

- Scum rarely die on Day 1.

- Scum do not want to bus their partners on Day 1 because they lose numbers and give town a shitton of information and the only advantage they get is "muh town cred" which means jack shit because they still have to survive for an extra day and town cred doesn't save you in LYLO.

- Scum with strong thread presence do not lose their partners on Day 1 because they can divert the lynch onto a townie.

- If a scum player dies on Day 1, then the scum cannot have a strong thread presence because otherwise the lynch would have not hit scum.

- Therefore the scum must be among the passive lurkers.

Like this is fucking airtight logic.

On October 09 2016 21:27 justanothertownie wrote:
Oats is just flailing right now.

On October 09 2016 22:24 Calix wrote:
Because Oats is skirting around doing anything productive in the most hilarious manner. Did you see his talk with JAT earlier?

I still think your Palmar town-read sucks. Can you find town motivation for the posts that Koshi has flagged up? Otherwise having a 'strong opening' is not a town tell.

On October 09 2016 22:27 justanothertownie wrote:
Really oats? That's the "sick read"?

On October 09 2016 22:37 Calix wrote:
My dude, if you think JAT was making up shit with his Superbia case then surely you can go to the case and point out where JAT was bullshitting, right?