|
I disagree that the calix/nu thing was obviously TvT btw. calix had a comparatively passive role in it. Which I can't fault her for but I don't think the whole thing makes her town at all.
|
On October 07 2016 18:31 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
This guy is my hero
If you flip town we should probably lynch him for tmi.
|
On October 07 2016 17:42 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 17:08 justanothertownie wrote:
I disagree that the calix/nu thing was obviously TvT btw. calix had a comparatively passive role in it. Which I can't fault her for but I don't think the whole thing makes her town at all. This is Grade A bullshit. You're telling me that actively posing a question and accusing someone based on that and tunneling is 'comparatively passive'? If that's passive then your posts are worthy of the Pulitzer prize.
"Comparatively" as in "compared to nu".
Yes, you did that stuff and I never said the whole thing makes you mafia. I just feel the general procedure of the argument was nu berating you (never really understood why he felt the need to do it since apparently you are "obvious town" to him) while you just went along with the shitshow. I just don't think that makes you town.
|
On October 07 2016 17:58 Oatsmaster wrote:
jat has posted absolutely no content whatsoever, its disgusting how little shit is in his 10 page filter.
Jat, find a scumread and write some shit about him go
I already stated my reads numerous times and wrote shit about them. If you did not see that you haven't read my filter.
|
On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
The fact that there is nothing new in itself is a reason to scumread palmar btw.
Yes, he is a lazy asshole as town but not when he is the designated lynch.
|
On October 07 2016 18:46 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 18:38 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:31 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
This guy is my hero If you flip town we should probably lynch him for tmi. if I flip town you lynch marv, you understand that, right?
If you actually start to play at some point and he is still leading a mislynch on you then you have a point.
|
On October 07 2016 18:50 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 18:38 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:31 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
This guy is my hero If you flip town we should probably lynch him for tmi. Eww gross post. Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 18:41 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 17:42 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 17:08 justanothertownie wrote:
I disagree that the calix/nu thing was obviously TvT btw. calix had a comparatively passive role in it. Which I can't fault her for but I don't think the whole thing makes her town at all. This is Grade A bullshit. You're telling me that actively posing a question and accusing someone based on that and tunneling is 'comparatively passive'? If that's passive then your posts are worthy of the Pulitzer prize. "Comparatively" as in "compared to nu". Yes, you did that stuff and I never said the whole thing makes you mafia. I just feel the general procedure of the argument was nu berating you (never really understood why he felt the need to do it since apparently you are "obvious town" to him) while you just went along with the shitshow. I just don't think that makes you town. Eww another gross post. Why would me being "passive compared to NU" mean anything? You're not actually accusing me of being passive in general, so your comment is meaningless. You're not accusing me of being mafia. You just FELT the need to make a comment saying that I'm less townie than NU...but you don't think it makes me scum so again, this comment is meaningless. What the fuck was the point? All you said was "Calix is less townie than NU" but you don't think I'm mafia either so it looks like you just posted some bullshit for the sake of posting it.
The point was very simple. People (oats I think) called your shitfight obviously TvT. I disagree with that - this should not be a reason to townread you.
|
On October 07 2016 18:54 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 18:52 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:50 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:38 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:31 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
This guy is my hero If you flip town we should probably lynch him for tmi. Eww gross post. On October 07 2016 18:41 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 17:42 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 17:08 justanothertownie wrote:
I disagree that the calix/nu thing was obviously TvT btw. calix had a comparatively passive role in it. Which I can't fault her for but I don't think the whole thing makes her town at all. This is Grade A bullshit. You're telling me that actively posing a question and accusing someone based on that and tunneling is 'comparatively passive'? If that's passive then your posts are worthy of the Pulitzer prize. "Comparatively" as in "compared to nu". Yes, you did that stuff and I never said the whole thing makes you mafia. I just feel the general procedure of the argument was nu berating you (never really understood why he felt the need to do it since apparently you are "obvious town" to him) while you just went along with the shitshow. I just don't think that makes you town. Eww another gross post. Why would me being "passive compared to NU" mean anything? You're not actually accusing me of being passive in general, so your comment is meaningless. You're not accusing me of being mafia. You just FELT the need to make a comment saying that I'm less townie than NU...but you don't think it makes me scum so again, this comment is meaningless. What the fuck was the point? All you said was "Calix is less townie than NU" but you don't think I'm mafia either so it looks like you just posted some bullshit for the sake of posting it. The point was very simple. People (oats I think) called your shitfight obviously TvT. I disagree with that - this should not be a reason to townread you. It was 100% a TvT, go away
Says the guy who did not list calix as town in his list.
Can you explain how I have been "atrociously wrong" all game? You cannot seriously fault anyone for scumreading you, even if you are town.
|
On October 07 2016 18:57 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 18:56 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:54 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 18:52 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:50 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:38 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:31 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
This guy is my hero If you flip town we should probably lynch him for tmi. Eww gross post. On October 07 2016 18:41 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 17:42 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 17:08 justanothertownie wrote:
I disagree that the calix/nu thing was obviously TvT btw. calix had a comparatively passive role in it. Which I can't fault her for but I don't think the whole thing makes her town at all. This is Grade A bullshit. You're telling me that actively posing a question and accusing someone based on that and tunneling is 'comparatively passive'? If that's passive then your posts are worthy of the Pulitzer prize. "Comparatively" as in "compared to nu". Yes, you did that stuff and I never said the whole thing makes you mafia. I just feel the general procedure of the argument was nu berating you (never really understood why he felt the need to do it since apparently you are "obvious town" to him) while you just went along with the shitshow. I just don't think that makes you town. Eww another gross post. Why would me being "passive compared to NU" mean anything? You're not actually accusing me of being passive in general, so your comment is meaningless. You're not accusing me of being mafia. You just FELT the need to make a comment saying that I'm less townie than NU...but you don't think it makes me scum so again, this comment is meaningless. What the fuck was the point? All you said was "Calix is less townie than NU" but you don't think I'm mafia either so it looks like you just posted some bullshit for the sake of posting it. The point was very simple. People (oats I think) called your shitfight obviously TvT. I disagree with that - this should not be a reason to townread you. It was 100% a TvT, go away Says the guy who did not list calix as town in his list. Can you explain how I have been "atrociously wrong" all game? You cannot seriously fault anyone for scumreading you, even if you are town. I just did
Yes, but if it was 100 % a TvT you would probably have said that when you made your list, no? You wouldn't need her recent posts to figure that out.
|
On October 07 2016 18:57 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 18:46 Palmar wrote:
It jives rather well with what I've been thinking about this game.
Batsnacks sounded like a townie
Oats sounds like a townie
NU sounds like a special snowflake
Grack is not as funny as I would've thought he should be, but I do like him nonetheless, for now.
Superbia is being an ass, but he does that all the time as all alignments, don't think he's been overtly scummy. One of the big milestones today is going to be whether or not he realizes what is up. If he doesn't, he needs to be dropped very low on everyone's lists when I flip town. Superbia is smart, knows me well, and a good player in general. If he votes for me when I'm town, that's super concerning.
Damdred and Stutters are players I have completely ignored.
Marv is going to drop his vote on me. If he actually stays he's 100% mafia. He reads me better than any player in the history of TL mafia, he has basically a 100% rate on figuring my alignment by day 2 when he's town. If I ever flip town, and he is still calling me mafia, he is scum. there is NO WAY AROUND IT. Thing is, I also know that he knows exactly this. He CAN'T be wrong on me, so I know he's going to end up drop his vote on me today. Depending on whether I believe the reasoning there's a tiny chance I'm wrong. But the NK, his play, his lack of enthusiasm for some things and just some tonally weird things, all point to marv-mafia. Not to mention, both HF and I picked up a townie vibe from batsnacks, and marv completely failed to recognize it. He is better at town than both of us, and that is super concerning.
JAT/Koshi/Calix <--- Three strong players who have been atrociously wrong throughout the game. There is definitely town in this group, probably even two. Whichever ones of you are town need to pull head out of asses and start playing reasonably. It is very likely that one of the townies is Koshi, because him tunneling stupid things is kind of what he does as town, the other two are slightly better so who knows.
Regarding Calix specifically, my day 1 read of her is mostly tonal. She felt very analytical and willing to try to solve the game when she was town in the last game I was with her. This contrasts her more timid and reserved tone here. I am also slightly suspicious of how she could read me so well on day 1 (against all odds she was calling me town) and then dropped it with some complete bullshit reasoning on n1, that is worrying. I'm insulted that you think I'm on the same level as JAT based purely on ONE GAME. That's not even meta, that's just a random fucking game.
That was not an insult.
|
On October 07 2016 18:59 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 18:52 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:50 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:38 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:31 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
This guy is my hero If you flip town we should probably lynch him for tmi. Eww gross post. On October 07 2016 18:41 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 17:42 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 17:08 justanothertownie wrote:
I disagree that the calix/nu thing was obviously TvT btw. calix had a comparatively passive role in it. Which I can't fault her for but I don't think the whole thing makes her town at all. This is Grade A bullshit. You're telling me that actively posing a question and accusing someone based on that and tunneling is 'comparatively passive'? If that's passive then your posts are worthy of the Pulitzer prize. "Comparatively" as in "compared to nu". Yes, you did that stuff and I never said the whole thing makes you mafia. I just feel the general procedure of the argument was nu berating you (never really understood why he felt the need to do it since apparently you are "obvious town" to him) while you just went along with the shitshow. I just don't think that makes you town. Eww another gross post. Why would me being "passive compared to NU" mean anything? You're not actually accusing me of being passive in general, so your comment is meaningless. You're not accusing me of being mafia. You just FELT the need to make a comment saying that I'm less townie than NU...but you don't think it makes me scum so again, this comment is meaningless. What the fuck was the point? All you said was "Calix is less townie than NU" but you don't think I'm mafia either so it looks like you just posted some bullshit for the sake of posting it. The point was very simple. People (oats I think) called your shitfight obviously TvT. I disagree with that - this should not be a reason to townread you. Okay so you were just discrediting a town-read that Oats had even though you don't scum-read me either. Good to know.
I did not say that either.
You are somewhere between low end of null and scum. Haven't made up my mind yet.
|
On October 07 2016 19:00 Calix wrote:
JAT's posts are extremely triggering with how scummy they are right now. Pls tag.
If you want to convince anyone you should probably at some point start explaining what exactly about my posts is scummy. Because all you did all game was say they are and the only justification you ever really gave died with batsnacks. It is not very pleasant to put up with this shit.
|
On October 07 2016 19:03 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 19:00 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:59 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:52 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:50 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:38 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:31 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
This guy is my hero If you flip town we should probably lynch him for tmi. Eww gross post. On October 07 2016 18:41 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 17:42 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 17:08 justanothertownie wrote:
I disagree that the calix/nu thing was obviously TvT btw. calix had a comparatively passive role in it. Which I can't fault her for but I don't think the whole thing makes her town at all. This is Grade A bullshit. You're telling me that actively posing a question and accusing someone based on that and tunneling is 'comparatively passive'? If that's passive then your posts are worthy of the Pulitzer prize. "Comparatively" as in "compared to nu". Yes, you did that stuff and I never said the whole thing makes you mafia. I just feel the general procedure of the argument was nu berating you (never really understood why he felt the need to do it since apparently you are "obvious town" to him) while you just went along with the shitshow. I just don't think that makes you town. Eww another gross post. Why would me being "passive compared to NU" mean anything? You're not actually accusing me of being passive in general, so your comment is meaningless. You're not accusing me of being mafia. You just FELT the need to make a comment saying that I'm less townie than NU...but you don't think it makes me scum so again, this comment is meaningless. What the fuck was the point? All you said was "Calix is less townie than NU" but you don't think I'm mafia either so it looks like you just posted some bullshit for the sake of posting it. The point was very simple. People (oats I think) called your shitfight obviously TvT. I disagree with that - this should not be a reason to townread you. Okay so you were just discrediting a town-read that Oats had even though you don't scum-read me either. Good to know. I did not say that either. You are somewhere between low end of null and scum. Haven't made up my mind yet. Duh, obviously you're not going to directly say that. You saw someone give out a town-read. Your first response was to attack the town-read even though you claim you don't scum-read me either. Your reasoning is that I'm "less townie than NU" (lol) This reads like scum rationale over a townie mindset.
Are you intentionally misrepresenting me or just bad at reading?
I saw someone throw out a reason to townread you which I think is faulty. I mentioned that. The end.
Never said that I scumread you in this context or any of the other stuff you are saying right now. My only message was that the shitfight should be treated as NAI regarding you.
|
On October 07 2016 19:06 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 19:00 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:59 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:52 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:50 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:38 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:31 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
This guy is my hero If you flip town we should probably lynch him for tmi. Eww gross post. On October 07 2016 18:41 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 17:42 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 17:08 justanothertownie wrote:
I disagree that the calix/nu thing was obviously TvT btw. calix had a comparatively passive role in it. Which I can't fault her for but I don't think the whole thing makes her town at all. This is Grade A bullshit. You're telling me that actively posing a question and accusing someone based on that and tunneling is 'comparatively passive'? If that's passive then your posts are worthy of the Pulitzer prize. "Comparatively" as in "compared to nu". Yes, you did that stuff and I never said the whole thing makes you mafia. I just feel the general procedure of the argument was nu berating you (never really understood why he felt the need to do it since apparently you are "obvious town" to him) while you just went along with the shitshow. I just don't think that makes you town. Eww another gross post. Why would me being "passive compared to NU" mean anything? You're not actually accusing me of being passive in general, so your comment is meaningless. You're not accusing me of being mafia. You just FELT the need to make a comment saying that I'm less townie than NU...but you don't think it makes me scum so again, this comment is meaningless. What the fuck was the point? All you said was "Calix is less townie than NU" but you don't think I'm mafia either so it looks like you just posted some bullshit for the sake of posting it. The point was very simple. People (oats I think) called your shitfight obviously TvT. I disagree with that - this should not be a reason to townread you. Okay so you were just discrediting a town-read that Oats had even though you don't scum-read me either. Good to know. I did not say that either. You are somewhere between low end of null and scum. Haven't made up my mind yet. She's 100% town. Agree now.
Make me.
|
On October 07 2016 19:08 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 19:07 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 19:06 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 19:00 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:59 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:52 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:50 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:38 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:31 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
This guy is my hero If you flip town we should probably lynch him for tmi. Eww gross post. On October 07 2016 18:41 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 17:42 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 17:08 justanothertownie wrote:
I disagree that the calix/nu thing was obviously TvT btw. calix had a comparatively passive role in it. Which I can't fault her for but I don't think the whole thing makes her town at all. This is Grade A bullshit. You're telling me that actively posing a question and accusing someone based on that and tunneling is 'comparatively passive'? If that's passive then your posts are worthy of the Pulitzer prize. "Comparatively" as in "compared to nu". Yes, you did that stuff and I never said the whole thing makes you mafia. I just feel the general procedure of the argument was nu berating you (never really understood why he felt the need to do it since apparently you are "obvious town" to him) while you just went along with the shitshow. I just don't think that makes you town. Eww another gross post. Why would me being "passive compared to NU" mean anything? You're not actually accusing me of being passive in general, so your comment is meaningless. You're not accusing me of being mafia. You just FELT the need to make a comment saying that I'm less townie than NU...but you don't think it makes me scum so again, this comment is meaningless. What the fuck was the point? All you said was "Calix is less townie than NU" but you don't think I'm mafia either so it looks like you just posted some bullshit for the sake of posting it. The point was very simple. People (oats I think) called your shitfight obviously TvT. I disagree with that - this should not be a reason to townread you. Okay so you were just discrediting a town-read that Oats had even though you don't scum-read me either. Good to know. I did not say that either. You are somewhere between low end of null and scum. Haven't made up my mind yet. She's 100% town. Agree now. Make me. Don't have to, I'll just join her crusade to lynch you.
Have fun with that ^^
But in order to not get lynched you should rather spend your time trying to find mafia instead of wasting it.
|
On October 07 2016 19:09 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 19:06 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 19:03 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 19:00 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:59 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:52 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:50 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:38 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:31 Palmar wrote:On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
This guy is my hero If you flip town we should probably lynch him for tmi. Eww gross post. On October 07 2016 18:41 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 17:42 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 17:08 justanothertownie wrote:
I disagree that the calix/nu thing was obviously TvT btw. calix had a comparatively passive role in it. Which I can't fault her for but I don't think the whole thing makes her town at all. This is Grade A bullshit. You're telling me that actively posing a question and accusing someone based on that and tunneling is 'comparatively passive'? If that's passive then your posts are worthy of the Pulitzer prize. "Comparatively" as in "compared to nu". Yes, you did that stuff and I never said the whole thing makes you mafia. I just feel the general procedure of the argument was nu berating you (never really understood why he felt the need to do it since apparently you are "obvious town" to him) while you just went along with the shitshow. I just don't think that makes you town. Eww another gross post. Why would me being "passive compared to NU" mean anything? You're not actually accusing me of being passive in general, so your comment is meaningless. You're not accusing me of being mafia. You just FELT the need to make a comment saying that I'm less townie than NU...but you don't think it makes me scum so again, this comment is meaningless. What the fuck was the point? All you said was "Calix is less townie than NU" but you don't think I'm mafia either so it looks like you just posted some bullshit for the sake of posting it. The point was very simple. People (oats I think) called your shitfight obviously TvT. I disagree with that - this should not be a reason to townread you. Okay so you were just discrediting a town-read that Oats had even though you don't scum-read me either. Good to know. I did not say that either. You are somewhere between low end of null and scum. Haven't made up my mind yet. Duh, obviously you're not going to directly say that. You saw someone give out a town-read. Your first response was to attack the town-read even though you claim you don't scum-read me either. Your reasoning is that I'm "less townie than NU" (lol) This reads like scum rationale over a townie mindset. Are you intentionally misrepresenting me or just bad at reading? I saw someone throw out a reason to townread you which I think is faulty. I mentioned that. The end. Never said that I scumread you in this context or any of the other stuff you are saying right now. My only message was that the shitfight should be treated as NAI regarding you. Keep proving my point, lol. Why don't you case me and I case you if I'm 'null-scum'? Sound fair?
I will case you whenever I think I need to which is not right now since I am not trying to lynch you.
Since you seem to be trying to lynch me you should probably case me if you can though. So go ahead.
|
On October 07 2016 19:14 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 19:13 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 19:09 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 19:06 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 19:03 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 19:00 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:59 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:52 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:50 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:38 justanothertownie wrote:
[quote]
If you flip town we should probably lynch him for tmi. Eww gross post. On October 07 2016 18:41 justanothertownie wrote:
[quote]
"Comparatively" as in "compared to nu".
Yes, you did that stuff and I never said the whole thing makes you mafia. I just feel the general procedure of the argument was nu berating you (never really understood why he felt the need to do it since apparently you are "obvious town" to him) while you just went along with the shitshow. I just don't think that makes you town. Eww another gross post. Why would me being "passive compared to NU" mean anything? You're not actually accusing me of being passive in general, so your comment is meaningless. You're not accusing me of being mafia. You just FELT the need to make a comment saying that I'm less townie than NU...but you don't think it makes me scum so again, this comment is meaningless. What the fuck was the point? All you said was "Calix is less townie than NU" but you don't think I'm mafia either so it looks like you just posted some bullshit for the sake of posting it. The point was very simple. People (oats I think) called your shitfight obviously TvT. I disagree with that - this should not be a reason to townread you. Okay so you were just discrediting a town-read that Oats had even though you don't scum-read me either. Good to know. I did not say that either. You are somewhere between low end of null and scum. Haven't made up my mind yet. Duh, obviously you're not going to directly say that. You saw someone give out a town-read. Your first response was to attack the town-read even though you claim you don't scum-read me either. Your reasoning is that I'm "less townie than NU" (lol) This reads like scum rationale over a townie mindset. Are you intentionally misrepresenting me or just bad at reading? I saw someone throw out a reason to townread you which I think is faulty. I mentioned that. The end. Never said that I scumread you in this context or any of the other stuff you are saying right now. My only message was that the shitfight should be treated as NAI regarding you. Keep proving my point, lol. Why don't you case me and I case you if I'm 'null-scum'? Sound fair? I will case you whenever I think I need to which is not right now since I am not trying to lynch you. Since you seem to be trying to lynch me you should probably case me if you can though. So go ahead. If you're not trying to lynch me then who are you trying to lynch? And if you're not trying to lynch anyone then what are you doing again?
I am lynching Palmar right now and have said that and also voted him for ages. That should be pretty obvious.
I would love to keep listening to your bullshit but unfortunately I have to work now.
|
Ok, I took a step back from this game. This isn't fun to play at all - I really wanted to care less about this game than I usually have been doing but so far it just doesn't work. And mafia killed the only somewhat reasonable person (besides maybe marv) in the game. What a surprise.
I decided that the people scumreading me can't all be mafia. Still I am being attacked for basically no real reason. The only actual reason I remember for me being mafia came from the guy we mislynched day1. It was hilariously bad but still he believed he had something and he put it into words. It is extremely aggrevating to be called mafia for "being underwhelming" or similar shit without anything to back this claim up. And it is also really really easy for mafia to just hop onto this kind of reasoning without any need for justification. Yes, I did get in some rather unimportant shitfights but I don't handle it very well when I am being accused of things I have no control over or which are simply untrue. That has nothing to do with my alignment and if you want I can prove this by showing you several games were it all went similar to here. So no, I am not underperforming. This has happened always when my time for a mafia game was limited.
I propose the townies between you guys the following deal:
- I will try to keep myself from arguing over little things and provide you with any information you want (I should have some time for the rest of the dayphase).
- If you seriously consider lynching me today you will reason out your reason to scumread me in your own words. No "I am sheeping this guy" or "your filter is boring" or anything like that. If you think my filter is boring then explain to me why. And no easily factcheckable incorrect claims like "you didn't give any reads" or "you aren't pushing anything". I literally gave a read on everyone in the fucking game on day1 for example and I was very clear about what I have been pushing this day.
I will provide you guys with where I stand in general anyways but this way I can 1. easily adress and refute any reason for why you are misreading me 2. figure out who the mafia guys on my wagon are. If you play ball and I still get mislynched it will be my own fault and it probably needed to happen because people just have too high expectations of my play. But I don't think that will happen.
Everyone who keeps accusing me of not having done anything or similar shit will just get ignored and can kindly go fuck himself.
|
And I will immediately prove myself as a giant hypocrite by sayng that as long as Palmar and marv keep scumreading each other the likelihood that I will vote outside of those 2 is very low and I think not solving this today would be a big mistake.
|
On October 08 2016 02:32 NeverUnlucky wrote:Jat, how about you kindly remove me from the /ignore list so we can have a little chat? I will try not to be abrasive, as I can understand it can ruin the fun of the game sometimes. :3 Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 18:44 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 17:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
anyone who tries to give reasons to lynch palmar is clearly not reading the thread because there is nothing new that can be added to the stuff already said about palmar.
The fact that there is nothing new in itself is a reason to scumread palmar btw. Yes, he is a lazy asshole as town but not when he is the designated lynch. First I want to address this. You say that Plamar is lazy as town unless he is set to be the lynch. Considering that he has made some attempts to contribute this morning, why is your vote still on him? What makes him scummy? My understanding of your vote was that it was a pressure vote to get him to contribute, which he has done to an extent. Therefore, unless you think he is scummy and can show me how, I don't understand why your vote is still on him. Show nested quote +On October 07 2016 19:16 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 19:14 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 19:13 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 19:09 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 19:06 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 19:03 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 19:00 justanothertownie wrote:On October 07 2016 18:59 Calix wrote:On October 07 2016 18:52 justanothertownie wrote:
[quote]
The point was very simple. People (oats I think) called your shitfight obviously TvT. I disagree with that - this should not be a reason to townread you. Okay so you were just discrediting a town-read that Oats had even though you don't scum-read me either. Good to know. I did not say that either. You are somewhere between low end of null and scum. Haven't made up my mind yet. Duh, obviously you're not going to directly say that. You saw someone give out a town-read. Your first response was to attack the town-read even though you claim you don't scum-read me either. Your reasoning is that I'm "less townie than NU" (lol) This reads like scum rationale over a townie mindset. Are you intentionally misrepresenting me or just bad at reading? I saw someone throw out a reason to townread you which I think is faulty. I mentioned that. The end. Never said that I scumread you in this context or any of the other stuff you are saying right now. My only message was that the shitfight should be treated as NAI regarding you. Keep proving my point, lol. Why don't you case me and I case you if I'm 'null-scum'? Sound fair? I will case you whenever I think I need to which is not right now since I am not trying to lynch you. Since you seem to be trying to lynch me you should probably case me if you can though. So go ahead. If you're not trying to lynch me then who are you trying to lynch? And if you're not trying to lynch anyone then what are you doing again? I am lynching Palmar right now and have said that and also voted him for ages. That should be pretty obvious. I would love to keep listening to your bullshit but unfortunately I have to work now.
You are correct. At the moment my vote doesn't really mean much tbh. Palmar did stuff and it wasn't horrible. But he certainly did not leave his mafia range like grack claimed. If you think so you have no idea about his play.
I would like to see marvs reaction before concluding anything. Usually the townie between them will easily come out on top. So far it isn't obvious to me who that is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
