[M][N] Star Wars: Rogue 1 Hype Mafia - Page 14

On August 29 2016 19:00 Palmar wrote:


Like to elaborate further on the geript thing. It's of special notice that when he is posting, Rels is clearly running away with the vote, and as such, geript should be paying attention to that part of the game, yet all he says about my case is "i am not impressed" without giving any further reasoning about it. In his conclusion he states "Rels is useless as usual" or something like that, which is like the weakest possible stance you can take on the person currently up for lynch.

Like I would've been fine if geript's criticism was actually explained, or thought out at all. His long posts really stick out as "I'm gonna quote a bunch of shit and add random commentary so it looks like I'm doing things".

Essentially, despite the long form of his posts, what he has done is basically written a glorified list post that looks something like this:



Not that lists aren't fine, they're often a good way to gauge where someone stands on a game, but meeeehhh~~~

Also, he completely disregarded my point on RB which I still think is an excellent point.

So yeah. geript's entrance is shit.

On August 29 2016 23:21 Palmar wrote:
The point is, geript was generally "suspicious" or at least "meh" on most of the things I posted (which is incidentally a very weak stance to take) and then he does this:



Notice the "probably true". He agrees with my logic (and it's perfect logic, my RB read is literlally the best thing in this thread). Geript actually agrees that objectively RB's thought process should lead people to conclude he is town.



and yet he somehow ends up in geript's scumlist. Which basically proves the point that I was trying to make that geript's random commentary is just that, completely random and has no relevance to what he's actually thinking. His summary does not match with his commentary, because he's disassociated from his reads, ie: they're not real because they're not real. He's mafia.

This is actually a really, really good day 1 case guys. Get in line.

On September 01 2016 01:12 Palmar wrote:


This here is a very similar (and very valid) point to the one I made on day 1 regarding geript's RB read. The concept is exactly the same: geript doesn't have any kind of internal consistency in his reads. I'm fine with people changing their minds, but this isn't as much changing his mind as it is just him saying random stuff at random times.

On September 05 2016 20:29 Palmar wrote:
I'm voting geript.

He has twice shown massive inconsistencies in his own reads.

He has done almost nothing to move the game in whatever direction he wants to take it.

He only comments on the game occasionally, and usually with little impact.

On September 06 2016 04:36 Tictock wrote:


The amount of failure in your ability to understand what I write astounds me. I was quite clearly saying how I interpreted his post before and how that lead me to form an early lead, but what he had said in a recent post countered that line of thought.

It's like you are not even trying to see what my thought process is.

If you think me swapping two of my reads around is opportunistic well then that should be fun for you.

On September 06 2016 05:51 Trfel wrote:
If geript and DanelerH are here and willing I would switch to Tictock.

Geript's not even voting to save himself. And I know it's not because the counterwagon is mafia.

On September 06 2016 05:51 Trfel wrote:
If geript and DanelerH are here and willing I would switch to Tictock.

Geript's not even voting to save himself. And I know it's not because the counterwagon is mafia.