|
On June 26 2016 11:58 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 11:48 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:31 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:14 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 10:31 GlowingBear wrote:
The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you. I'm saying that his style of play is not well suited to leadership. Do you have a better option? At the moment I think that tumble or super are better. Are you comfortable with calling them almost-confirmed town? If so, what makes you think they're town? Also, what kind of approach do you think they have which makes them suitable to be president?
No, I don't think I'm comfortable calling them almost-confirmed town at this point. But I put them in a similar boat with QT. I think they have a more stable, considering play style, whereas I find QT more erratic.
|
On June 26 2016 12:01 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Chez because he has a more confusing playstyle
You think that's a good thing ? XD
|
|
|
On June 26 2016 12:10 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 12:07 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:58 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:48 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:31 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:14 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 10:31 GlowingBear wrote:
The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you. I'm saying that his style of play is not well suited to leadership. Do you have a better option? At the moment I think that tumble or super are better. Are you comfortable with calling them almost-confirmed town? If so, what makes you think they're town? Also, what kind of approach do you think they have which makes them suitable to be president? No, I don't think I'm comfortable calling them almost-confirmed town at this point. But I put them in a similar boat with QT. I think they have a more stable, considering play style, whereas I find QT more erratic. . So, you're saying that QT, Tumble and Superbia are basically at the same level of towniness, is that right? I'd like you to specify to me what exactly made you think they are town.
That's quite the order! I don't think I have time to make it exact so this synopsis will have to suffice:
Super: I see a very similar style of game play to what I saw last game when he was town. I think that his posts have been pretty on point.
Tumble: I think that he has been open with his thoughts, and I like the direction that he has been giving to the game so far. Many of his thoughts I find are echoing mine.
QT: I find that his posts have been very reminiscent of the last game. I think that he has shown consideration of the game so far.
|
On June 26 2016 12:11 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 12:08 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 12:01 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Chez because he has a more confusing playstyle You think that's a good thing ? XD of course. if chezinu is the mayor, we'd have no idea who he'd kill which means mafia wouldn't be able to predict the death and work around it or plan anything beforehand.
But mayor only chooses the kill the first night...
|
On June 26 2016 12:00 MoosyDoosy wrote:
@emperorchampion, what do you think of Artanis?
Have to read up on this guy, null atm
|
I'll have to think on it, but my gut says that the "towniest" person should be the pardonner, since this is the role we really can't give to maf.
|
On June 26 2016 12:34 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 12:22 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 12:10 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:07 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:58 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:48 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:31 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:14 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 10:31 GlowingBear wrote:
The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you. I'm saying that his style of play is not well suited to leadership. Do you have a better option? At the moment I think that tumble or super are better. Are you comfortable with calling them almost-confirmed town? If so, what makes you think they're town? Also, what kind of approach do you think they have which makes them suitable to be president? No, I don't think I'm comfortable calling them almost-confirmed town at this point. But I put them in a similar boat with QT. I think they have a more stable, considering play style, whereas I find QT more erratic. . So, you're saying that QT, Tumble and Superbia are basically at the same level of towniness, is that right? I'd like you to specify to me what exactly made you think they are town. That's quite the order! I don't think I have time to make it exact so this synopsis will have to suffice: Super: I see a very similar style of game play to what I saw last game when he was town. I think that his posts have been pretty on point. Tumble: I think that he has been open with his thoughts, and I like the direction that he has been giving to the game so far. Many of his thoughts I find are echoing mine. QT: I find that his posts have been very reminiscent of the last game. I think that he has shown consideration of the game so far. I have no problem with your Tumble and QT reads, but I don't understand what you like on Superbia. I went to his filter and I saw a lot of questions with no follow-up to them. Also, I saw him town leaning on Jean Valjean when he had like just 1 post that was null at best. I don't really understand how his posts have been on point. Also, do you have any idea how Superbia's scum meta is? Because although he might be playing a similar game to his last one, it doesn't necessarily mean he is town if his scum meta is pretty much the same as his mafia meta.
How do you not find fault with my QT read, but then with my Super read?
|
On June 26 2016 12:37 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 12:34 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:22 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 12:10 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:07 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:58 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:48 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:31 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:14 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 10:31 GlowingBear wrote:
The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you. I'm saying that his style of play is not well suited to leadership. Do you have a better option? At the moment I think that tumble or super are better. Are you comfortable with calling them almost-confirmed town? If so, what makes you think they're town? Also, what kind of approach do you think they have which makes them suitable to be president? No, I don't think I'm comfortable calling them almost-confirmed town at this point. But I put them in a similar boat with QT. I think they have a more stable, considering play style, whereas I find QT more erratic. . So, you're saying that QT, Tumble and Superbia are basically at the same level of towniness, is that right? I'd like you to specify to me what exactly made you think they are town. That's quite the order! I don't think I have time to make it exact so this synopsis will have to suffice: Super: I see a very similar style of game play to what I saw last game when he was town. I think that his posts have been pretty on point. Tumble: I think that he has been open with his thoughts, and I like the direction that he has been giving to the game so far. Many of his thoughts I find are echoing mine. QT: I find that his posts have been very reminiscent of the last game. I think that he has shown consideration of the game so far. I have no problem with your Tumble and QT reads, but I don't understand what you like on Superbia. I went to his filter and I saw a lot of questions with no follow-up to them. Also, I saw him town leaning on Jean Valjean when he had like just 1 post that was null at best. I don't really understand how his posts have been on point. Also, do you have any idea how Superbia's scum meta is? Because although he might be playing a similar game to his last one, it doesn't necessarily mean he is town if his scum meta is pretty much the same as his mafia meta. Btw can you quote a post where you think he was "on point"?
So I'll pussy(cat) out on the question answering stand-off since I'm heading to bed meow.
On June 25 2016 21:22 Superbia wrote:
I'm going to go with mainly gut again bc that actually worked out pretty well last d1.
Town:
- Art
- TW
- QT
Almost there:
- Chez
- TT
- Jin Valjean
- Damdred
- GB (least sure)
Somewhere:
- EC
- Skynx
On their way out of here:
- Moosy
- Jealous
|
On June 26 2016 12:55 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 12:50 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 12:37 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:34 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:22 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 12:10 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:07 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:58 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:48 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:31 GlowingBear wrote:
[quote]
Do you have a better option? At the moment I think that tumble or super are better. Are you comfortable with calling them almost-confirmed town? If so, what makes you think they're town? Also, what kind of approach do you think they have which makes them suitable to be president? No, I don't think I'm comfortable calling them almost-confirmed town at this point. But I put them in a similar boat with QT. I think they have a more stable, considering play style, whereas I find QT more erratic. . So, you're saying that QT, Tumble and Superbia are basically at the same level of towniness, is that right? I'd like you to specify to me what exactly made you think they are town. That's quite the order! I don't think I have time to make it exact so this synopsis will have to suffice: Super: I see a very similar style of game play to what I saw last game when he was town. I think that his posts have been pretty on point. Tumble: I think that he has been open with his thoughts, and I like the direction that he has been giving to the game so far. Many of his thoughts I find are echoing mine. QT: I find that his posts have been very reminiscent of the last game. I think that he has shown consideration of the game so far. I have no problem with your Tumble and QT reads, but I don't understand what you like on Superbia. I went to his filter and I saw a lot of questions with no follow-up to them. Also, I saw him town leaning on Jean Valjean when he had like just 1 post that was null at best. I don't really understand how his posts have been on point. Also, do you have any idea how Superbia's scum meta is? Because although he might be playing a similar game to his last one, it doesn't necessarily mean he is town if his scum meta is pretty much the same as his mafia meta. Btw can you quote a post where you think he was "on point"? So I'll pussy(cat) out on the question answering stand-off since I'm heading to bed meow. On June 25 2016 21:22 Superbia wrote:
I'm going to go with mainly gut again bc that actually worked out pretty well last d1.
Town:
- Art
- TW
- QT
Almost there:
- Chez
- TT
- Jin Valjean
- Damdred
- GB (least sure)
Somewhere:
- EC
- Skynx
On their way out of here:
- Moosy
- Jealous This is Superbia being on point? The post where he puts a guy as probably town for his opening only? Yeah, I can't trust you. You might be mafia.
Super's post is good because 1) I think the town reads are solid, 2) I liked his interpretation of Moosy's entrance 3) he has given thought to every player in the game. I think especially 3 shows the level of thought that he has put into the game so far, and is reflective of how I think he plays as town.
|
Oh boy, these are some dark days.
Hold on, let me go through a few more things
|
On June 26 2016 13:04 Tumblewood wrote:ok now I focus on ec Show nested quote +On June 26 2016 12:22 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 12:10 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 12:07 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:58 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:48 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 11:31 GlowingBear wrote:On June 26 2016 11:14 emperorchampion wrote:On June 26 2016 10:31 GlowingBear wrote:
The fact that you're trying to discredit quicktwist while still calling him town makes me very suspicious of you. I'm saying that his style of play is not well suited to leadership. Do you have a better option? At the moment I think that tumble or super are better. Are you comfortable with calling them almost-confirmed town? If so, what makes you think they're town? Also, what kind of approach do you think they have which makes them suitable to be president? No, I don't think I'm comfortable calling them almost-confirmed town at this point. But I put them in a similar boat with QT. I think they have a more stable, considering play style, whereas I find QT more erratic. . So, you're saying that QT, Tumble and Superbia are basically at the same level of towniness, is that right? I'd like you to specify to me what exactly made you think they are town. That's quite the order! I don't think I have time to make it exact so this synopsis will have to suffice: Super: I see a very similar style of game play to what I saw last game when he was town. I think that his posts have been pretty on point. Tumble: I think that he has been open with his thoughts, and I like the direction that he has been giving to the game so far. Many of his thoughts I find are echoing mine. QT: I find that his posts have been very reminiscent of the last game. I think that he has shown consideration of the game so far. these reads are not very thought out. you could press the button on generictownreadgenerator.com a few times and get the same results. also his response to gb's questioning is pretty meh, just one step above picking a random post from super's filter.
The reads are thought out, I just wanted to go to bed bruh. If you look through your filter and mine I think you will find a lot of similar ideas.
|
On June 27 2016 01:42 Superbia wrote:
Nice timing EC.
Better bring something good to the table x;
Good time to finish eating and doing other things :D
|
On June 26 2016 18:20 Superbia wrote:
EC is mostly for being on sidelines and not really doing anything. It became clear to me post-newbie-game that he is a something experience mafia/werewolf player. At least in real life. He should know what to do.
Ya got me, my main account is "Jean Valjean" :x
|
I find myself very at odds with Jean's posts.
It looks like now he has a lot of time to spend on this mafia game, whereas his entrance post he was giving a very hands-off look for all of day 1.
On June 25 2016 19:54 Jean Valjean wrote:
Hello
I am unfortunately not going to be able to contribute heavily today. I will do my best to get a chance to read the game and I will probably focus on the first few hours of posting.
I am more just popping by to let you guys know I am alive and have no intention of getting replaced or modkilled, despite the fact that my start will be slower than I would have preferred.
To me I have two acceptable outcomes this cycle. The preferred outcome is that I actually find something that's worth chasing and put my vote there, but a very reasonable alternative that is probably more likely to happen is that I find someone I strongly believe to be town, and lend my vote to whatever his or hers cause is.
I'm looking forward to talking to you all and playing with you.
My conclusion at the end of this post:
[quote]
From his posts so far this is what I have seen:
1) He is admittedly not very involved
2) He has read through Super's and my filter, which he believes are empty but he gives no mention of Moosy's lack of contributions
3) Very defensive posting
Overall I'm not thrilled with his responses, and I will be very interested to see the level of his interactions as the game progresses.
[\quote]
I believe that the three points above can easily be explained by someone who is afk, ie you don't have time to look through the entire game, you just read filter, you've given a reason that you are away and someone leans scum on you for not believing that reason. This in a way makes sense to me.
Jean's activity since then I'm not so sure. It seems like he is willing to invest time in the game now, and he has been making posts that are at odds with his opening goals. I would be interested to hear others opinions on this matter though, since he seems to be heavily town read.
|
Wrong "/" whoops ^
Anyhow, I'm going to shower
|
On June 27 2016 02:29 Jealous wrote:
Hahaha "giving my D". I meant "Giving my D1 reads."
Still high, eh 
|
On June 27 2016 02:36 GlowingBear wrote:
Btw I'm inactive right now because I'm working. Tomorrow is the first day of a theatre play we've being working on for months and I am rehearsing right now
Good luck, beak a leg 
|
So can we have a proportional representation system? I'm not sure if I like the top candidates :/
|
On June 27 2016 02:40 GlowingBear wrote:
Reminder:
I AM NAMED VT
Vote me for mayor but REMEMBER TO SPREAD YOUR VOTES WITH SOMEONE VERY TOWNIE
Don't just vote me or you'll let Mafia have an easy time to decide the pardonner
Whether or not this is true, this is such a good play since you won't be able to be cop read once you are pardoner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
