|
On May 25 2016 05:29 Holyflare wrote:
I don't particularly understand how you can be so certain of tumblewood being mafia that you completely ditch your evaluation of Superbia looking scummy ritoky.
Good post.
In all seriousness though, I find Ritoky's line of thought very questionable here. You are so sure on tumble being mafia that that makes me town? I'm all for calling me town, but really?
Your TW case did not convince me. If you do not convince me of TW being mafia by EoD, you're done boyo.
|
On May 25 2016 05:35 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On May 25 2016 05:33 Superbia wrote:On May 25 2016 05:31 Holyflare wrote:
Also the JAT Superbia fight is bs and definitely looks forced for no reason other than to shit up the thread. Superbia looking worse for just ignoring easily fact checkable information to perpetuate arguments and the fact that he couldn't understand why I called him scummy. You actually thought that was scummy? That was not an information-prod? It can be both but to make it easier I'll just say yes.
How is it scum indicative?
|
On May 25 2016 05:31 Holyflare wrote:
Also the JAT Superbia fight is bs and definitely looks forced for no reason other than to shit up the thread. Superbia looking worse for just ignoring easily fact checkable information to perpetuate arguments and the fact that he couldn't understand why I called him scummy.
What's your point? Are you insinuating we are mafia together or just that one player intentionally tried to shit up the thread and to look like he is contributing something by arguing with the other one? The latter is possible. The former is ridiculous.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 25 2016 05:36 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On May 25 2016 05:35 Holyflare wrote:On May 25 2016 05:33 Superbia wrote:On May 25 2016 05:31 Holyflare wrote:
Also the JAT Superbia fight is bs and definitely looks forced for no reason other than to shit up the thread. Superbia looking worse for just ignoring easily fact checkable information to perpetuate arguments and the fact that he couldn't understand why I called him scummy. You actually thought that was scummy? That was not an information-prod? It can be both but to make it easier I'll just say yes. How is it scum indicative?
Because it's something scum would do when they're not particularly thinking and trying to look like they're contributing.
|
On May 25 2016 05:35 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On May 25 2016 05:29 Holyflare wrote:
I don't particularly understand how you can be so certain of tumblewood being mafia that you completely ditch your evaluation of Superbia looking scummy ritoky. Good post. In all seriousness though, I find Ritoky's line of thought very questionable here. You are so sure on tumble being mafia that that makes me town? I'm all for calling me town, but really?
Your TW case did not convince me. If you do not convince me of TW being mafia by EoD, you're done boyo.
See? We agree on something.
(I am on my quest to buddy you now!)
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 25 2016 05:37 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 25 2016 05:31 Holyflare wrote:
Also the JAT Superbia fight is bs and definitely looks forced for no reason other than to shit up the thread. Superbia looking worse for just ignoring easily fact checkable information to perpetuate arguments and the fact that he couldn't understand why I called him scummy. What's your point? Are you insinuating we are mafia together or just that one player intentionally tried to shit up the thread and to look like he is contributing something by arguing with the other one? The latter is possible. The former is ridiculous.
Quite obviously the latter since I didn't say anything about you.
|
On May 25 2016 05:37 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On May 25 2016 05:36 Superbia wrote:On May 25 2016 05:35 Holyflare wrote:On May 25 2016 05:33 Superbia wrote:On May 25 2016 05:31 Holyflare wrote:
Also the JAT Superbia fight is bs and definitely looks forced for no reason other than to shit up the thread. Superbia looking worse for just ignoring easily fact checkable information to perpetuate arguments and the fact that he couldn't understand why I called him scummy. You actually thought that was scummy? That was not an information-prod? It can be both but to make it easier I'll just say yes. How is it scum indicative? Because it's something scum would do when they're not particularly thinking and trying to look like they're contributing.
It's slightly suboptimal town play. And even that is arguable.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Well I'm glad your need to be a pedant supercedes the need to point out who mafia are. It's very productive.
|
Yeah, he is really obstinate. Like I said - fits his mafia meta.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 25 2016 05:42 justanothertownie wrote:
Yeah, he is really obstinate. Like I said - fits his mafia meta.
The irony of this coming from you is not lost on me :D
What didn't you like about ritoky's my tw case?
|
On May 25 2016 05:43 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On May 25 2016 05:42 justanothertownie wrote:
Yeah, he is really obstinate. Like I said - fits his mafia meta. The irony of this coming from you is not lost on me :D What didn't you like about ritoky's my tw case?
I already forgot the specific because it as just really uninteresting in general. I think you pointed out some "problems" with his towny mindset and maybe I would agree with you had I not experienced tumbles townplay in a few games recently. He doesn't act very logical in general.
|
And sure - I can be obstinate. But at least in my case it isn't a scumtell :D
|
On May 25 2016 05:45 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 25 2016 05:43 Holyflare wrote:On May 25 2016 05:42 justanothertownie wrote:
Yeah, he is really obstinate. Like I said - fits his mafia meta. The irony of this coming from you is not lost on me :D What didn't you like about ritoky's my tw case? I already forgot the specific because it as just really uninteresting in general. I think you pointed out some "problems" with his towny mindset and maybe I would agree with you had I not experienced tumbles townplay in a few games recently. He doesn't act very logical in general.
^
|
This is genuinely frustrating because I don't think you can both be mafia.
Am I losing my mind here? Why the fuck is no one agreeing with me.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
2. Damdred
3. ritoky
4. Rels
5. LightningStrike
6. Koshi
7. Palmar
8. marvellosity
9. justanothertownie
10. sicklucker
11. Superbia
12. Tumblewood
13. nnn_thekushmountains
Well there's my mafia list.
|
On May 25 2016 05:42 justanothertownie wrote:
Yeah, he is really obstinate. Like I said - fits his mafia meta. You refering to Superbia in this post right JAT? If so what was his meta scumtells? I only played vs his scum/antitown twice but that was it.
|
On May 25 2016 05:46 Holyflare wrote:
2. Damdred
3. ritoky
4. Rels
5. LightningStrike
6. Koshi
7. Palmar
8. marvellosity
9. justanothertownie
10. sicklucker
11. Superbia
12. Tumblewood
13. nnn_thekushmountains
Well there's my mafia list.
Congrats everyone is mafia except for you. Wow so good......
|
On May 25 2016 05:46 Superbia wrote:
This is genuinely frustrating because I don't think you can both be mafia.
Am I losing my mind here? Why the fuck is no one agreeing with me.
JAT agreed with you on TW O_o So you are losing your mind here.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
When did ls become so mean?
|
On May 25 2016 05:47 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On May 25 2016 05:42 justanothertownie wrote:
Yeah, he is really obstinate. Like I said - fits his mafia meta. You refering to Superbia in this post right JAT? If so what was his meta scumtells? I only played vs his scum/antitown twice but that was it.
I don't have much more experience playing with him than you. But besides the JAT game recently where he acted like that I also remember another game where he was mafia and really really aggressive towards me. I don't know the games name off the top of my hat though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
