EPT[M][N]A Wonderful Normal Game of Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
| ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 14:45 RiceyKins wrote: Mig hasn't said a word since the game started where Dr.P has said one thing and hasn't come back. If the discussion is about which inactive player we believe should be lynched I'll go with Dr.P because he's clearly been here and made a decision not to continue but Mig is a ? and I can deal with waiting to see. It's not a great situation either way but if we're picking between the two I'd lynch Dr.P. And yeah I think it looks rehearsed. 18 hours into the game where neither of you have shown up "Oh man JAT hasn't posted yet he must be sick!" 5 minutes later "Ha Ha oh Marv I just came back from the doctor cause I'm sick". If you don't think that's some oddly good timing and an insane coincidence idk Considering there's almost nothing else to mention about the two of you to this point yeah its suspect. You also don't have to be lying about coming back from the doctor, it's very possible Marv knew and just waited for you to be around to put on a show. Why? Why on earth would we put on a show like that? It doesn't make any sense. What does a supposed mafia team of marv and me gain from doing that? Explain this to me. Of course it is an insane coincidence. That's why I found it so funny. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 14:52 Alakaslam wrote: Nah. It didn't actually do anything as it was largely ignored since it was always only half serious to begin with. Glad there are fewer postings this game. Not gonna ruin it any further with my usual behaviour behavior. Welcome the Saitama. I would gladly welcome the saitama. Didn't the saitama post quite a bit though? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 15:00 RiceyKins wrote: It gets way too WIFOM if I try to base everything on that JAT, and as I said you're still Null imo it just didn't look right and it's the only thing that's even worth mentioning about you so far. Although tbh you didn't seem to find it "so funny" either which is also why I found the whole thing kind of odd. It's not even WIFOM. There is 0 reason to assume we would do that as mafia if you think about if even for a split second. Your supposed line of thought is "this is unusual so it is scummy" without critically evaluating if that makes sense or not. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 15:16 Tubesock wrote: headed out for drinks and dinner. Will be back in a few hours. In the mean time: Towns: Kush Shape Slam Marvish Ricey jat If I were to pick who to lynch of the "actives" as it were I'd take time deciding between killing and Fazer. I didnt' really like their answers but they are actually closer to null than anything. You can probably infer what I didn't like about them by some of the questions I directed at them. for the inactives I'd lynch in this orderish Dr Thrawn Etellex Mig (modkill though?) Palmar I don't see how ricey or shape can be in a townlist. I have no problem with Killing so far. I would not add Palmar to the inactivity policy lynches. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 15:17 Tubesock wrote: I posted that before I saw you're Etellex vote. I was unsure if you were actually goign to do anything. I'm happy with your last few posts. I think I agree with this though. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 15:35 Alakaslam wrote: This should tell you more. Not sure if just getting there first or not seeing it... Are you talking to me? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 15:37 Alakaslam wrote: Yes. Indirectly enough though- I apologize. Do you glean more than you are saying here or no? Not really. I wouldn't give a townread to anyone for stuff that has been posted this far but the ones I pointed out are the ones where I don't understand how Tubesock could even come to this conclusion. And concerning the scumreads - Fazer is just problematic in general. He did next to nothing last game and then he got vigged on my command. He was town. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
If you think there is more to glean then go ahead and explain. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 20:48 marvellosity wrote: I don't like this very much, Slam. This may be because I have close and recent personal experience of my other half struggling in exactly the same fashion.I thought (weakly) when I read Etellex's first post that it indicated town. While town doesn't know at all what to look for, mafia doesn't have to know what to look for, and can always find something, anything, suspicious because it doesn't actually matter what Well... | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
| ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 20:52 marvellosity wrote: i dunno about Riceykins. His point about you (jat) and me is ridiculous. But if he's a smurf who has a vague idea of who we are (and i guess especially me because i've been around longer) it's kinda a bold play to try to implicate 2 influential players with something so thin. Maybe but on the other hand I would be more inclined to believe he actually genuinely thought that if he would NOT be familiar with our play. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 20:55 marvellosity wrote: yes. but you have to go back 4+ years to not be familiar with mine Exactly. Which is the problem. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
| ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 21:02 marvellosity wrote: all the players i signed up to play with aren't playing  this makes me sad as i'm not playing so much anymore Yeah... I signed up hoping to finally just be a sheep for once. And now everyone is bailing. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 21:04 Tubesock wrote: I think you guys are being over dramatic about his scumming you. He said you're both nulls and thought the coincidence was strange. I don't get why it matters if he knows your reputations or not. He'd know you're both good players, maybe he doesn't know you enough to know you don't do crazy shit. You're good enough to do crazy shit though. And even then if he hasn't played in awhile then he woldn't know if you could do crazy shit or not. Why is this such a big deal? Overall it is not that big of a deal but from the reads that habe been posted so far it is definitely one of the worst. Because it just doesn't check out. I don't see a town mindset or thought process behind it. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 20:39 Tubesock wrote: To be fair, there isn't a single player in this game that has done anything that a mafia version of them couldn't do. Shape did 1 thing I thought was furthering town (pushed Fazer). I liked a couple of Ricer's posts. + Show Spoiler [2 posts I liked from Ricey] + On May 04 2016 10:58 RiceyKins wrote: I don't think bold accusations are inherently bad Fazers, but I disagree that Killing is being bold with his claims. If one of his reasons for suspecting me is saying sorry to Marv idk I find that rather weak actually On May 04 2016 11:26 RiceyKins wrote: I think it's just that I don't find him convincing Fazers. Calls me out for being non-confrontational and then half-commits to Shape and myself by saying his theory is probably dumb and he didn't really want to go into detail. I agree with you that it's good that he's trying though but I obviously disagree with his targets  jat, so do you think Marv is town? I mean whatever you want to call it since you don't like giving away townreads. And by your disbelief should I infer you think Shape and/or Ricer is mafia? I missed this earlier. No, it is too early to tell on marv. Sadly him posting is not enough since I know that he did not join a game recently on the grounds of not being able to put in a decent effort as mafia. So if he is mafia I expect him to try this game. His tone has been ok so far. Shape is completely null to me and Rice is somewhat suspicious. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
You have to come up with mafiareads. You have to fabricate reasons to do so. This seems like a fabricated reason. Like I said his explanation translates to "this is unusual/improbable so it is scummy". | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 21:32 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: May I explain it? Mafia hard it hard to interact with each other. They know each other are scummy but don't want to lynch each other. So by forcing yourself to have a natural conversation, you are making your interactions not look like s/s. So naturally you would go about having a "natural" conversation by inventing some ridiculously improbable scenario. Ok kush. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16342 Posts
On May 04 2016 21:36 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: You are missing Ricey's point I think. It's not the coincidence that you were there at the same time as much as the banter itself. Which felt forced and awkward to him (and annoying to me). The things are related. If you want to fake a natural conversation you don't try to draw attention to it by putting on a unnecessary show like that. | ||
| ||
