|
On February 18 2016 06:31 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:28 Shapelog wrote:+ Show Spoiler [Tumble's Read progession] +On February 17 2016 11:11 Tumblewood wrote:
@rsoul : I the only people I have any real insight on are Trfel, Eden (town), Tictock, kush (townlean), you, Shapelog (null), Palmar, SL (scum).
The other four have been too absent for my tastes... Breshke has been moderately active, stay tuned for a filter dive. On February 17 2016 11:15 Tumblewood wrote:
EBWOP: Palmar as a scum lean because I have little confidence in that read. On February 18 2016 03:42 Tumblewood wrote:
No one's acting definitively scummy, so I'm going to POE this vote.
The 'Do Not Lynch' List
Eden, for putting a lot of effort into finding scum and moving the day along productively.
Trfel, for similar reasons. Also, I stand by that mafia would not have gotten into an argument like that earlier in the game.
Tictock, for making clear and useful points.
The 'Bad Lynch' List
Rsoul, for helping in a trolly manner.
Palmar, for being overconfident and having huge changes of heart.
Kush, but I don't know why.
Breshke, for making clear and insightful points, though sparse.
The 'Wait And See' List
GB, Scott, and The Shining for showing up late.
That leaves us SL and... other SL. I keep seeing things in sick's play that are scummy, but then you all assure me that those are just normal things for him. Sick's defense amounts to "don't lynch me because that's a bad idea / I'm an easy townread."
Shape has been acting similar to his last game as scum. I had the privilege of being in the scum QT with him, and his gameplan was this: play the "too scummy to be scum" card, and spam the thread (especially with votes) to make it harder to follow.
I think both are valid options for a lynch; whoever makes the better case in the next two hours dodges my vote. On February 18 2016 05:30 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 05:26 Breshke wrote:On February 18 2016 05:24 Tumblewood wrote:On February 18 2016 05:18 Trfel wrote:
Oh yeah, scott31337's in the game.
Maybe just lynch him? This feels scummy to me... Town doesn't just settle for a lynch like that, especially when there are other valid options. Who are the valid options? I think trefels post is perfectly justified. Right now my lynch list is shining, GB, scott and palmar. I have not mentioned any of these people before and it is mostly based on activity and how this EoD is turning out. SL, Shape, gB, shining, Scott, and Palmar are all reasonable lynches; I don't see what makes Scott the better option in Trfel 's mind. On February 18 2016 05:56 Tumblewood wrote:
I can't sleep easy if I see any of the other wagons getting lynched over Palmar. ##vote: Palmar So he scum leans Palmar, puts him in the bad lynch pile, then calls him a reasonable lynch. And then ends up votes for him. SO the real question is....Why did Tumble vote Palmar (with a passion) when he put palmar in the bad lynch list? a good question -_-
Who is your top scum read R-Rated Girl?
|
On February 18 2016 06:34 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:27 nooniansoong wrote:On February 18 2016 06:24 Trfel wrote:
Mafia didn't care so much about the lynch, but secretly, they probably wanted Palmar lynched, because he's a player they'd probably have to night kill in the near-ish future. People respect Palmar way too much.. GB can I help you with anything? You actually can't, Kush. You've voted me for a policy lynch that doesn't make sense IMO ("I'm killing GB because GB is unreadable") and you could say that because of my early inactivity, but when I came back you decided you should lynch me anyways because my reason to scum read SL was bullshit (you failed to explain why that was bullshit). You don't think that what you're doing is suspicious? Not giving a single read at all and deciding to vote people using the excuse of a policy lynch, then when asked about people you think could be Mafia you bring a list of people you're suspicious but can't say why they are suspicious? You really can't see why I think you're mafia?
Ask around. I commonly refuse to give reads on d1.
I townread Palmar earlier. I hedged that read by saying I sucked at reading him, but I did townread him.
What didn't make sense about my policy lynch? You had made liek 2 drunk posts that were unreadable.
You came back and I thought your SL read was bullshit, because as I've said THREE times, you hadn't even read all his filter. And SL always has a scummy early game. I thought SL looked townier as the day went on, which you ignored. So that read rung false to me.
|
*pulls shirt* Umm...Kush
+ Show Spoiler +On February 17 2016 01:26 nooniansoong wrote:PALMARI don't agree with Trfel's meta of palmar. Nothing about palmar seems townie to me. His reads are lazy or don't make sense. Show nested quote +On February 16 2016 20:31 Palmar wrote:
List of mafia:
Trfel for TMI on my alignment and something I can't remember
Breshke for 100% mafia
Tumblewood for complaining
sicklucker for complaining about useless day
Tictock for sheeping other people when he knows he's best player SLSeems to be playing the "tooscummytobescum" card He wants to kill Eden because he "claimed VT" is wrong for town and easy for scum. On February 17 2016 01:45 nooniansoong wrote:
Just because your name is boldified in red doesn't mean I think you're scum. On February 18 2016 04:44 nooniansoong wrote:
@GB I'm sorry. You deserve a real answer from me. I don't like to do this day 1, even if it's only for my own benefit but here goes.
People I am the most suspicious of currently:
2) Shapelog
3)Ticktock
5) Breshke
8) The Shining
9) mdergScott31337
10) Eden1892
12GlowingBear
On February 18 2016 05:00 nooniansoong wrote:
Fine let's switch to GB.
I still think shape should claim, because we won't know if there is 2 or 3 prs depending on how many mafia prs there are.
So if he claims that makes his claim more easily verifiable or falsifiable.
I think this is what GB is trying to get at....
|
And FURTHER, GB, you have played only 2 games with my since my hiatus. In one of them you were scum. And I refused to give reads at all earlygame.
|
Shape, what is your point with those quotes?
|
On February 18 2016 06:35 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:31 rsoultin wrote:On February 18 2016 06:28 Shapelog wrote:+ Show Spoiler [Tumble's Read progession] +On February 17 2016 11:11 Tumblewood wrote:
@rsoul : I the only people I have any real insight on are Trfel, Eden (town), Tictock, kush (townlean), you, Shapelog (null), Palmar, SL (scum).
The other four have been too absent for my tastes... Breshke has been moderately active, stay tuned for a filter dive. On February 17 2016 11:15 Tumblewood wrote:
EBWOP: Palmar as a scum lean because I have little confidence in that read. On February 18 2016 03:42 Tumblewood wrote:
No one's acting definitively scummy, so I'm going to POE this vote.
The 'Do Not Lynch' List
Eden, for putting a lot of effort into finding scum and moving the day along productively.
Trfel, for similar reasons. Also, I stand by that mafia would not have gotten into an argument like that earlier in the game.
Tictock, for making clear and useful points.
The 'Bad Lynch' List
Rsoul, for helping in a trolly manner.
Palmar, for being overconfident and having huge changes of heart.
Kush, but I don't know why.
Breshke, for making clear and insightful points, though sparse.
The 'Wait And See' List
GB, Scott, and The Shining for showing up late.
That leaves us SL and... other SL. I keep seeing things in sick's play that are scummy, but then you all assure me that those are just normal things for him. Sick's defense amounts to "don't lynch me because that's a bad idea / I'm an easy townread."
Shape has been acting similar to his last game as scum. I had the privilege of being in the scum QT with him, and his gameplan was this: play the "too scummy to be scum" card, and spam the thread (especially with votes) to make it harder to follow.
I think both are valid options for a lynch; whoever makes the better case in the next two hours dodges my vote. On February 18 2016 05:30 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 05:26 Breshke wrote:On February 18 2016 05:24 Tumblewood wrote:On February 18 2016 05:18 Trfel wrote:
Oh yeah, scott31337's in the game.
Maybe just lynch him? This feels scummy to me... Town doesn't just settle for a lynch like that, especially when there are other valid options. Who are the valid options? I think trefels post is perfectly justified. Right now my lynch list is shining, GB, scott and palmar. I have not mentioned any of these people before and it is mostly based on activity and how this EoD is turning out. SL, Shape, gB, shining, Scott, and Palmar are all reasonable lynches; I don't see what makes Scott the better option in Trfel 's mind. On February 18 2016 05:56 Tumblewood wrote:
I can't sleep easy if I see any of the other wagons getting lynched over Palmar. ##vote: Palmar So he scum leans Palmar, puts him in the bad lynch pile, then calls him a reasonable lynch. And then ends up votes for him. SO the real question is....Why did Tumble vote Palmar (with a passion) when he put palmar in the bad lynch list? a good question -_- Who is your top scum read R-Rated Girl?
between GB/shining right now
their behavior just doesn't line up with how they voted
i think i'm inclined to more or less believe you unless i have a reason to think otherwise
bresh/trfel have been and likely always will be town for me
unless eden's play has greatly changed i don't see him being scum here, either
scott/tumble are kinda up in the air for me (;o; i really don't want tumble to be scum...it would be nice to be right on him) and i'd like them to answer questions
yeah i need to reread tho
|
^ Tis true. last game Kush was a meanie and we had to make him think he was correct to give us the reads. *Looks at kush and runs way."
I kid I kid, I <3 you Kush, U to GB.
|
On February 18 2016 03:28 nooniansoong wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 03:25 GlowingBear wrote:On February 17 2016 01:45 nooniansoong wrote:
Just because your name is boldified in red doesn't mean I think you're scum. Enlighten me what you meant here, kush. This doesn't make sense at all Half joking, half discounting my "scumreads" up to that point as not worth very much.
you are missing this quote which should assuage any uneasiness about the scumread/notscumread of palmar.
|
On February 18 2016 06:42 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:35 Shapelog wrote:On February 18 2016 06:31 rsoultin wrote:On February 18 2016 06:28 Shapelog wrote:+ Show Spoiler [Tumble's Read progession] +On February 17 2016 11:11 Tumblewood wrote:
@rsoul : I the only people I have any real insight on are Trfel, Eden (town), Tictock, kush (townlean), you, Shapelog (null), Palmar, SL (scum).
The other four have been too absent for my tastes... Breshke has been moderately active, stay tuned for a filter dive. On February 17 2016 11:15 Tumblewood wrote:
EBWOP: Palmar as a scum lean because I have little confidence in that read. On February 18 2016 03:42 Tumblewood wrote:
No one's acting definitively scummy, so I'm going to POE this vote.
The 'Do Not Lynch' List
Eden, for putting a lot of effort into finding scum and moving the day along productively.
Trfel, for similar reasons. Also, I stand by that mafia would not have gotten into an argument like that earlier in the game.
Tictock, for making clear and useful points.
The 'Bad Lynch' List
Rsoul, for helping in a trolly manner.
Palmar, for being overconfident and having huge changes of heart.
Kush, but I don't know why.
Breshke, for making clear and insightful points, though sparse.
The 'Wait And See' List
GB, Scott, and The Shining for showing up late.
That leaves us SL and... other SL. I keep seeing things in sick's play that are scummy, but then you all assure me that those are just normal things for him. Sick's defense amounts to "don't lynch me because that's a bad idea / I'm an easy townread."
Shape has been acting similar to his last game as scum. I had the privilege of being in the scum QT with him, and his gameplan was this: play the "too scummy to be scum" card, and spam the thread (especially with votes) to make it harder to follow.
I think both are valid options for a lynch; whoever makes the better case in the next two hours dodges my vote. On February 18 2016 05:30 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 05:26 Breshke wrote:On February 18 2016 05:24 Tumblewood wrote:On February 18 2016 05:18 Trfel wrote:
Oh yeah, scott31337's in the game.
Maybe just lynch him? This feels scummy to me... Town doesn't just settle for a lynch like that, especially when there are other valid options. Who are the valid options? I think trefels post is perfectly justified. Right now my lynch list is shining, GB, scott and palmar. I have not mentioned any of these people before and it is mostly based on activity and how this EoD is turning out. SL, Shape, gB, shining, Scott, and Palmar are all reasonable lynches; I don't see what makes Scott the better option in Trfel 's mind. On February 18 2016 05:56 Tumblewood wrote:
I can't sleep easy if I see any of the other wagons getting lynched over Palmar. ##vote: Palmar So he scum leans Palmar, puts him in the bad lynch pile, then calls him a reasonable lynch. And then ends up votes for him. SO the real question is....Why did Tumble vote Palmar (with a passion) when he put palmar in the bad lynch list? a good question -_- Who is your top scum read R-Rated Girl? between GB/shining right now their behavior just doesn't line up with how they voted i think i'm inclined to more or less believe you unless i have a reason to think otherwise bresh/trfel have been and likely always will be town for me unless eden's play has greatly changed i don't see him being scum here, either scott/tumble are kinda up in the air for me (;o; i really don't want tumble to be scum...it would be nice to be right on him) and i'd like them to answer questions yeah i need to reread tho
Why am I Mafia again?
|
On February 18 2016 06:42 nooniansoong wrote:
Shape, what is your point with those quotes?
Well *folds legs* I thought liek you did post some reads and i was all like "You lieing bastard!" So i filter dive you and I didn't find anything so i was like "Well i was just wrong" But Thennnnnnnn I remember GB saying how putting Palmar name and read made no sense. And Gb prob. thought it was a read and you statement was a joke. Soooooooooo, it would make some sense for Gb to be mad. then you sus. list atm prob. came off as a read.
|
On February 18 2016 06:46 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:42 nooniansoong wrote:
Shape, what is your point with those quotes? Well *folds legs* I thought liek you did post some reads and i was all like "You lieing bastard!" So i filter dive you and I didn't find anything so i was like "Well i was just wrong" But Thennnnnnnn I remember GB saying how putting Palmar name and read made no sense. And Gb prob. thought it was a read and you statement was a joke. Soooooooooo, it would make some sense for Gb to be mad. then you sus. list atm prob. came off as a read.
So you're townreading GB?
|
On February 18 2016 06:45 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:42 rsoultin wrote:On February 18 2016 06:35 Shapelog wrote:On February 18 2016 06:31 rsoultin wrote:On February 18 2016 06:28 Shapelog wrote:+ Show Spoiler [Tumble's Read progession] +On February 17 2016 11:11 Tumblewood wrote:
@rsoul : I the only people I have any real insight on are Trfel, Eden (town), Tictock, kush (townlean), you, Shapelog (null), Palmar, SL (scum).
The other four have been too absent for my tastes... Breshke has been moderately active, stay tuned for a filter dive. On February 17 2016 11:15 Tumblewood wrote:
EBWOP: Palmar as a scum lean because I have little confidence in that read. On February 18 2016 03:42 Tumblewood wrote:
No one's acting definitively scummy, so I'm going to POE this vote.
The 'Do Not Lynch' List
Eden, for putting a lot of effort into finding scum and moving the day along productively.
Trfel, for similar reasons. Also, I stand by that mafia would not have gotten into an argument like that earlier in the game.
Tictock, for making clear and useful points.
The 'Bad Lynch' List
Rsoul, for helping in a trolly manner.
Palmar, for being overconfident and having huge changes of heart.
Kush, but I don't know why.
Breshke, for making clear and insightful points, though sparse.
The 'Wait And See' List
GB, Scott, and The Shining for showing up late.
That leaves us SL and... other SL. I keep seeing things in sick's play that are scummy, but then you all assure me that those are just normal things for him. Sick's defense amounts to "don't lynch me because that's a bad idea / I'm an easy townread."
Shape has been acting similar to his last game as scum. I had the privilege of being in the scum QT with him, and his gameplan was this: play the "too scummy to be scum" card, and spam the thread (especially with votes) to make it harder to follow.
I think both are valid options for a lynch; whoever makes the better case in the next two hours dodges my vote. On February 18 2016 05:30 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 05:26 Breshke wrote:On February 18 2016 05:24 Tumblewood wrote:On February 18 2016 05:18 Trfel wrote:
Oh yeah, scott31337's in the game.
Maybe just lynch him? This feels scummy to me... Town doesn't just settle for a lynch like that, especially when there are other valid options. Who are the valid options? I think trefels post is perfectly justified. Right now my lynch list is shining, GB, scott and palmar. I have not mentioned any of these people before and it is mostly based on activity and how this EoD is turning out. SL, Shape, gB, shining, Scott, and Palmar are all reasonable lynches; I don't see what makes Scott the better option in Trfel 's mind. On February 18 2016 05:56 Tumblewood wrote:
I can't sleep easy if I see any of the other wagons getting lynched over Palmar. ##vote: Palmar So he scum leans Palmar, puts him in the bad lynch pile, then calls him a reasonable lynch. And then ends up votes for him. SO the real question is....Why did Tumble vote Palmar (with a passion) when he put palmar in the bad lynch list? a good question -_- Who is your top scum read R-Rated Girl? between GB/shining right now their behavior just doesn't line up with how they voted i think i'm inclined to more or less believe you unless i have a reason to think otherwise bresh/trfel have been and likely always will be town for me unless eden's play has greatly changed i don't see him being scum here, either scott/tumble are kinda up in the air for me (;o; i really don't want tumble to be scum...it would be nice to be right on him) and i'd like them to answer questions yeah i need to reread tho Why am I Mafia again?
the bs about not townreading palmar when you're saying it's a mafia-pushed lynch, and then throwing your vote away
|
you are, you bastard.
what "reasonable angles" did he push?
|
On February 18 2016 06:41 nooniansoong wrote:
And FURTHER, GB, you have played only 2 games with my since my hiatus. In one of them you were scum. And I refused to give reads at all earlygame.
I actually remember you commenting stuff in those two games. Especially the newbie one, you were very contributive.. You were more insightful. And you aren't here. Because you are not commenting stuff. I rarely saw you counterargumenting anything in the thread.
Why would you hold your reads, Kush?
About SL, can you point out what made you think he was town? Because I can't understand, especially when you just said earlier everyone was null
|
On February 18 2016 06:30 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:27 The Shining wrote:On February 18 2016 06:18 rsoultin wrote:On February 18 2016 05:48 The Shining wrote:
Actually Palmar isn't bad either, he's done nothing towny and he could just be getting a pass because he posted direct stuff and fuxkwd off after ??? And then my stronger read Tumble voted him. And GB made a point about how votes piled on Palmar. only you voted for tumble long before tumble voted for palmar lol >< bs meter alert both of these things happened AFTER your vote on tumble
No voting for my stronger read happened before anything else. Even though I didn't think Palmar wasn't that bad of a lynch, he wasn't my preferred lynch. When I considered possibly switching, Tumble voted and GB made the point he made. It's pretty simple.
|
On February 18 2016 06:42 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:35 Shapelog wrote:On February 18 2016 06:31 rsoultin wrote:On February 18 2016 06:28 Shapelog wrote:+ Show Spoiler [Tumble's Read progession] +On February 17 2016 11:11 Tumblewood wrote:
@rsoul : I the only people I have any real insight on are Trfel, Eden (town), Tictock, kush (townlean), you, Shapelog (null), Palmar, SL (scum).
The other four have been too absent for my tastes... Breshke has been moderately active, stay tuned for a filter dive. On February 17 2016 11:15 Tumblewood wrote:
EBWOP: Palmar as a scum lean because I have little confidence in that read. On February 18 2016 03:42 Tumblewood wrote:
No one's acting definitively scummy, so I'm going to POE this vote.
The 'Do Not Lynch' List
Eden, for putting a lot of effort into finding scum and moving the day along productively.
Trfel, for similar reasons. Also, I stand by that mafia would not have gotten into an argument like that earlier in the game.
Tictock, for making clear and useful points.
The 'Bad Lynch' List
Rsoul, for helping in a trolly manner.
Palmar, for being overconfident and having huge changes of heart.
Kush, but I don't know why.
Breshke, for making clear and insightful points, though sparse.
The 'Wait And See' List
GB, Scott, and The Shining for showing up late.
That leaves us SL and... other SL. I keep seeing things in sick's play that are scummy, but then you all assure me that those are just normal things for him. Sick's defense amounts to "don't lynch me because that's a bad idea / I'm an easy townread."
Shape has been acting similar to his last game as scum. I had the privilege of being in the scum QT with him, and his gameplan was this: play the "too scummy to be scum" card, and spam the thread (especially with votes) to make it harder to follow.
I think both are valid options for a lynch; whoever makes the better case in the next two hours dodges my vote. On February 18 2016 05:30 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 05:26 Breshke wrote:On February 18 2016 05:24 Tumblewood wrote:On February 18 2016 05:18 Trfel wrote:
Oh yeah, scott31337's in the game.
Maybe just lynch him? This feels scummy to me... Town doesn't just settle for a lynch like that, especially when there are other valid options. Who are the valid options? I think trefels post is perfectly justified. Right now my lynch list is shining, GB, scott and palmar. I have not mentioned any of these people before and it is mostly based on activity and how this EoD is turning out. SL, Shape, gB, shining, Scott, and Palmar are all reasonable lynches; I don't see what makes Scott the better option in Trfel 's mind. On February 18 2016 05:56 Tumblewood wrote:
I can't sleep easy if I see any of the other wagons getting lynched over Palmar. ##vote: Palmar So he scum leans Palmar, puts him in the bad lynch pile, then calls him a reasonable lynch. And then ends up votes for him. SO the real question is....Why did Tumble vote Palmar (with a passion) when he put palmar in the bad lynch list? a good question -_- Who is your top scum read R-Rated Girl? between GB/shining right now their behavior just doesn't line up with how they voted i think i'm inclined to more or less believe you unless i have a reason to think otherwise bresh/trfel have been and likely always will be town for me unless eden's play has greatly changed i don't see him being scum here, either scott/tumble are kinda up in the air for me (;o; i really don't want tumble to be scum...it would be nice to be right on him) and i'd like them to answer questions yeah i need to reread tho
Idk, i can see how Town!GB comes back after not reading the thread and end up voting Kush. Especially since Kush sort of, whats the word, voted him? No not that something else. If it is Scum!GB, hmmm. Maybe be parked his vote on Kush for cred or something? But that wouldn't really make sense, since he didn't have merit to the read and therefore would not get cred.
Shining....Idk. Might of parked his vote on off wagon as scum. I prob check his filter in the morning.
Idk, Head hurts to much to do a lot. I think i am getting a mirgane :/
|
On February 18 2016 06:50 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:30 rsoultin wrote:On February 18 2016 06:27 The Shining wrote:On February 18 2016 06:18 rsoultin wrote:On February 18 2016 05:48 The Shining wrote:
Actually Palmar isn't bad either, he's done nothing towny and he could just be getting a pass because he posted direct stuff and fuxkwd off after ??? And then my stronger read Tumble voted him. And GB made a point about how votes piled on Palmar. only you voted for tumble long before tumble voted for palmar lol >< bs meter alert both of these things happened AFTER your vote on tumble No voting for my stronger read happened before anything else. Even though I didn't think Palmar wasn't that bad of a lynch, he wasn't my preferred lynch. When I considered possibly switching, Tumble voted and GB made the point he made. It's pretty simple.
hn...okay, could be
don't leave the area lol ><
|
On February 18 2016 06:49 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:45 GlowingBear wrote:On February 18 2016 06:42 rsoultin wrote:On February 18 2016 06:35 Shapelog wrote:On February 18 2016 06:31 rsoultin wrote:On February 18 2016 06:28 Shapelog wrote:+ Show Spoiler [Tumble's Read progession] +On February 17 2016 11:11 Tumblewood wrote:
@rsoul : I the only people I have any real insight on are Trfel, Eden (town), Tictock, kush (townlean), you, Shapelog (null), Palmar, SL (scum).
The other four have been too absent for my tastes... Breshke has been moderately active, stay tuned for a filter dive. On February 17 2016 11:15 Tumblewood wrote:
EBWOP: Palmar as a scum lean because I have little confidence in that read. On February 18 2016 03:42 Tumblewood wrote:
No one's acting definitively scummy, so I'm going to POE this vote.
The 'Do Not Lynch' List
Eden, for putting a lot of effort into finding scum and moving the day along productively.
Trfel, for similar reasons. Also, I stand by that mafia would not have gotten into an argument like that earlier in the game.
Tictock, for making clear and useful points.
The 'Bad Lynch' List
Rsoul, for helping in a trolly manner.
Palmar, for being overconfident and having huge changes of heart.
Kush, but I don't know why.
Breshke, for making clear and insightful points, though sparse.
The 'Wait And See' List
GB, Scott, and The Shining for showing up late.
That leaves us SL and... other SL. I keep seeing things in sick's play that are scummy, but then you all assure me that those are just normal things for him. Sick's defense amounts to "don't lynch me because that's a bad idea / I'm an easy townread."
Shape has been acting similar to his last game as scum. I had the privilege of being in the scum QT with him, and his gameplan was this: play the "too scummy to be scum" card, and spam the thread (especially with votes) to make it harder to follow.
I think both are valid options for a lynch; whoever makes the better case in the next two hours dodges my vote. On February 18 2016 05:30 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 05:26 Breshke wrote:On February 18 2016 05:24 Tumblewood wrote:On February 18 2016 05:18 Trfel wrote:
Oh yeah, scott31337's in the game.
Maybe just lynch him? This feels scummy to me... Town doesn't just settle for a lynch like that, especially when there are other valid options. Who are the valid options? I think trefels post is perfectly justified. Right now my lynch list is shining, GB, scott and palmar. I have not mentioned any of these people before and it is mostly based on activity and how this EoD is turning out. SL, Shape, gB, shining, Scott, and Palmar are all reasonable lynches; I don't see what makes Scott the better option in Trfel 's mind. On February 18 2016 05:56 Tumblewood wrote:
I can't sleep easy if I see any of the other wagons getting lynched over Palmar. ##vote: Palmar So he scum leans Palmar, puts him in the bad lynch pile, then calls him a reasonable lynch. And then ends up votes for him. SO the real question is....Why did Tumble vote Palmar (with a passion) when he put palmar in the bad lynch list? a good question -_- Who is your top scum read R-Rated Girl? between GB/shining right now their behavior just doesn't line up with how they voted i think i'm inclined to more or less believe you unless i have a reason to think otherwise bresh/trfel have been and likely always will be town for me unless eden's play has greatly changed i don't see him being scum here, either scott/tumble are kinda up in the air for me (;o; i really don't want tumble to be scum...it would be nice to be right on him) and i'd like them to answer questions yeah i need to reread tho Why am I Mafia again? the bs about not townreading palmar when you're saying it's a mafia-pushed lynch, and then throwing your vote away
I wasn't townreading Palmar, then suddenly his wagon piled on and I thought could be Mafia driven, so I tried to lynch Kush
I really don't know how to explain. Like, I thought he was an okay lynch but at the same time his wagon gaining torque felt off?
|
On February 18 2016 06:31 Eden1892 wrote:
Tbh not really interested in defending the palmar lynch. My vote was not very well reasoned out. I just felt it was decent enough to consolidate on after I couldn't get Yung Shining on tha blocc
You still havent even acknowledged my response to you. And nothing about your case on me makes me lock scum. if you're town, you should probably reconsider and actually think objectively about who you're pushing and what their response is. But my town read is pretty weakened on you now after your showing up Just to push me before lynching another town in Palmar.
I'm really curious in what you have to say about my response
|
On February 18 2016 06:49 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:41 nooniansoong wrote:
And FURTHER, GB, you have played only 2 games with my since my hiatus. In one of them you were scum. And I refused to give reads at all earlygame. I actually remember you commenting stuff in those two games. Especially the newbie one, you were very contributive.. You were more insightful. And you aren't here. Because you are not commenting stuff. I rarely saw you counterargumenting anything in the thread. Why would you hold your reads, Kush? About SL, can you point out what made you think he was town? Because I can't understand, especially when you just said earlier everyone was null
I have made several comments and counterargued. For instance, I did not like breshke's argument against shape. Later I pushed Shape myself. Have you read my filter?
The newbie was a different type of game. When town needs someone to drive discussion I will do that. But this town doesn't need that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
