|
On February 18 2016 06:34 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:27 nooniansoong wrote:On February 18 2016 06:24 Trfel wrote:
Mafia didn't care so much about the lynch, but secretly, they probably wanted Palmar lynched, because he's a player they'd probably have to night kill in the near-ish future. People respect Palmar way too much.. GB can I help you with anything? You actually can't, Kush. You've voted me for a policy lynch that doesn't make sense IMO ("I'm killing GB because GB is unreadable") and you could say that because of my early inactivity, but when I came back you decided you should lynch me anyways because my reason to scum read SL was bullshit (you failed to explain why that was bullshit). You don't think that what you're doing is suspicious? Not giving a single read at all and deciding to vote people using the excuse of a policy lynch, then when asked about people you think could be Mafia you bring a list of people you're suspicious but can't say why they are suspicious? You really can't see why I think you're mafia?
Ask around. I commonly refuse to give reads on d1.
I townread Palmar earlier. I hedged that read by saying I sucked at reading him, but I did townread him.
What didn't make sense about my policy lynch? You had made liek 2 drunk posts that were unreadable.
You came back and I thought your SL read was bullshit, because as I've said THREE times, you hadn't even read all his filter. And SL always has a scummy early game. I thought SL looked townier as the day went on, which you ignored. So that read rung false to me.
|
And FURTHER, GB, you have played only 2 games with my since my hiatus. In one of them you were scum. And I refused to give reads at all earlygame.
|
Shape, what is your point with those quotes?
|
On February 18 2016 03:28 nooniansoong wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 03:25 GlowingBear wrote:On February 17 2016 01:45 nooniansoong wrote:
Just because your name is boldified in red doesn't mean I think you're scum. Enlighten me what you meant here, kush. This doesn't make sense at all Half joking, half discounting my "scumreads" up to that point as not worth very much.
you are missing this quote which should assuage any uneasiness about the scumread/notscumread of palmar.
|
On February 18 2016 06:46 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:42 nooniansoong wrote:
Shape, what is your point with those quotes? Well *folds legs* I thought liek you did post some reads and i was all like "You lieing bastard!" So i filter dive you and I didn't find anything so i was like "Well i was just wrong" But Thennnnnnnn I remember GB saying how putting Palmar name and read made no sense. And Gb prob. thought it was a read and you statement was a joke. Soooooooooo, it would make some sense for Gb to be mad. then you sus. list atm prob. came off as a read. 
So you're townreading GB?
|
you are, you bastard.
what "reasonable angles" did he push?
|
On February 18 2016 06:49 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 06:41 nooniansoong wrote:
And FURTHER, GB, you have played only 2 games with my since my hiatus. In one of them you were scum. And I refused to give reads at all earlygame. I actually remember you commenting stuff in those two games. Especially the newbie one, you were very contributive.. You were more insightful. And you aren't here. Because you are not commenting stuff. I rarely saw you counterargumenting anything in the thread. Why would you hold your reads, Kush? About SL, can you point out what made you think he was town? Because I can't understand, especially when you just said earlier everyone was null
I have made several comments and counterargued. For instance, I did not like breshke's argument against shape. Later I pushed Shape myself. Have you read my filter?
The newbie was a different type of game. When town needs someone to drive discussion I will do that. But this town doesn't need that.
|
@shape, in regards to GB:
On February 18 2016 06:49 nooniansoong wrote:
you are, you bastard.
what "reasonable angles" did he push?
|
@GB I don't liek to share my reads because they are very weak and changing all the time until they become more solidified around d2 usually.
|
On February 18 2016 06:57 GlowingBear wrote:
I didn't read tour filter. I've read most of the game and from that and from the interactions we had it felt like you're mafia.
Anyway I gotta go now but I will dive you later.
you didn't even read all of my short filter yet you are screaming for me to get CFD lynched. That's ridic.
|
Shape, it's wrong that you're not not wrong.
|
On February 18 2016 08:10 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 08:07 nooniansoong wrote:
Shape, it's wrong that you're not not wrong. What does that sentence mean
What does it mean to you?
|
Two thoughts. One, I got a kick out of seeing you write about me like that on actual physical paper. Two, you made me seem really scummy.
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On February 18 2016 10:30 Trfel wrote:
Nooniansoong, you said that you were okay with lynching Palmar despite thinking that he is town. Please explain why you were okay with this?
I wasn't okay with it exactly. I said I thought he was town, I gave a reason, and I voted for someone else.
Now, I wasn't actively campaigning against his lynch, this is true. That's because of these 4 reasons.
1 my read on him was not super solid.
2 I have a terrible of track record of reading him.
3 my terrible track record was lorded over me in the thread on multiple occasions by scott and palmar himself, and I didn't want to look like an idiot by being vocally wrong about him again. So yes I had a townread on him but I kept it kinda quiet.
4 I do not like Palmar. That's mean but it's honest. So him not being in the game makes it more fun for me.
|
scumlist
ticktock
GB
scott
breshke
rsoul
|
On February 18 2016 11:50 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2016 11:32 nooniansoong wrote:
scumlist
ticktock
GB
scott
breshke
rsoul
Hmmm. Hypothetical. You have a gun. Who do you shoot?
Probably Scott. I'm a believer in shooting inactive people.
|
Shining ask a dumb question you gonna get a dumb answer.
I actually town read Scott at the time for a dumb reason.
Now my read is somewhere between scummy, dunno, and town.
So I change my imaginary shot to gb.
|
ya dude your omgus looked really townie
|
@shapelog, so tumble changed his opinions and broke his own rule on no meta. That's not convincing me of his scuminess.
Furthermore, that quote that breshke brought up:
actually yeah shining could totally be mafia for encouraging a claim and then disappearing -_-
I think it's clear that tumble thought that the disappearing afterwards was what made shining scummy, not the encouraging a claim part.
Then breshke calls it contradictory because tumble also enouraged a claim. But it's not contradictory because the scumread wasn't based on merely encouraging the claim.
|
I really did want to townread GB. Shape, your points on him weren't not good. But then again think about this: If all the lynch candidates were town, what motivation does scum have to consolidate on any of them?
Anyway, I really did want to townread GB because I like him. But he put all that effort into MSPaints, and none into developing his reads. He is scumreading me without even reading the entirety of my small filter. You'd think actually reading my content would be a priority for him if he's going to scumread me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/3SdC2Tb.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/zftBrQp.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/pTsavXo.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/R1uxWyo.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/2c7QP5q.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/kfir4s5.jpg)
