|
On December 28 2015 02:58 N e s s wrote:
"trash forums"
wat
Yeah like this:
33% of the people post like "hi!" and don't really do anything else.
33% of the people make awesome cases like "you must be mafia because mafia vigilante shot you on D1, and the only possible explanation is that you shot yourself", and then a town vigilante shoots you.... or like, "this guy who said "Hi!" instead of "Hi." is scum because of the exclamation mark..." (yes, that's really how it goes..)
33% of the people -- the people who actually can play mafia, don't care to play because rofl..
Happens almost everywhere except for here.
|
On December 28 2015 03:01 N e s s wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2015 02:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 02:57 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 02:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 02:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 02:48 N e s s wrote:eh, rayn say whatever about me, atleast i know you're really, really wrong about everything  well said. about a guy who shares at least 2 of your scumreads. to be more exact shares 2/3 of your scumreads, and the third one you have (exo) is never ever going to be mafia in this game. Keep digging a hole. I would want to remind you this is not a forum where people are dumb enough to try lynch me for questioning illogical stuff in comparison to trash forums. Yeah, with that you're on me for the most BSist reasons. How am i sharing scum reads with anyone exactly? I am on you because you say shit that doesn't make any sense and you are not even trying to explain why you do so. You think Vivas is mafia. I do that too. You think TT is mafia. I do too. How the FUCK is that NOT sharing a scumread? It's literally what it is. So, i share 2/3 of your scumreads -- yet you somehow claim you KNOW "i am wrong about everything in this game". That, again -- is literally fucking bullshit. I didn't even realize i was sharing reads with you. and how the fuck am i saying "you're wrong about everything rayn"
then start realizing it. read the thread?
you literally said so.... here:
On December 28 2015 02:48 N e s s wrote:eh, rayn say whatever about me, atleast i know you're really, really wrong about everything
|
nobody seems to know how to behave in a civilised manner
In fact people are acting in a really civilized manner here.
If someone gets mad because they get questioned for their inconsistancies they should probably try to explain it instead of just throwing their shit on the floor and quit.
At least i am trying to act nice, but if people just straight out refuse to even TRY to explain what they mean.... Then it's their probelm.
|
And i am not calling him a moron. Fuck you Holyflare...
|
On December 28 2015 03:18 Holyflare wrote:
This thread doesn't understand the word civilised.
Fuck is not a normal word people used in civilised conversation.
Calling someone stupid is not something people do in civilised conversation.
Your way of questioning him was blatantly antagonistic and not getting the desired results and I'm pretty sure he misunderstood the phrasing of the whole thing and was confused so it did nothing to alleviate the situation.
Ness when someone says "Sharing reads," they simply mean that you have some scum reads and they also have the same scum reads as you. You haven't shared anything per se but you both have the same some scum reads.
And i asked him to explain what does he mean with "sharing reads".
I am also expecting an answer instead of quiting. If he has one.
Because he had an opinion, he should have an opinion what "sharing reads" in his opinion means no?
I am aggressive, i know, but i am no fucking way in hell being a dick here.
|
On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit.
so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant?
|
On December 28 2015 03:23 N e s s wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2015 03:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit. so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant? Well i see the word sharing so i know what that means. I can tell from context clues it means "sharing reads with another person" but i didn't even know i was sharing reads with you.
So, again...
Why did you then decide to say i am wrong on everything.
In my opinion that means all of my reads are bad, no?
But then, after that, you said that you don't know what my reads are (which was already confirmed).
How can you say that? It's not like if i am wrong on you all my other reads are shit aswell, is it?
|
Don't worry. Tkae your time and if you are town try just explain yourself. There is a reasonable explanation if that's the case.
|
On December 28 2015 03:27 N e s s wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2015 03:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:23 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit. so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant? Well i see the word sharing so i know what that means. I can tell from context clues it means "sharing reads with another person" but i didn't even know i was sharing reads with you. So, again... Why did you then decide to say i am wrong on everything. In my opinion that means all of my reads are bad, no? But then, after that, you said that you don't know what my reads are (which was already confirmed). How can you say that? It's not like if i am wrong on you all my other reads are shit aswell, is it? What i meant when i said that was you're wrong about me being scum and that your perspective on me saying that exchange between me and GB was wrong in your eyes.
Okay.
I still can't understand why you asked people on bandwagoning on Moosy (which wasn't exactly bandwagoning since exactly one person voted on him). You know what voting people for either RVS or pressure at the start of the game is, right?
Like... the way you approached to the situation -- based on where you come from, doesn't make sense to me.
So could you explain these things:
1) Why did you were actually concerned on people RVS'ing/"wagoning" on Moosy at the start of the game, when it is completely normal play regardless of anyone's affiliation on almost any forum that plays mafia?
2) Why did it seem like it was a reason to suspect the guy who voted? Did you really think that guy is a suspect for it? If not, again -- why (1)?
|
On December 27 2015 08:15 N e s s wrote:Show nested quote +On December 27 2015 08:03 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Alright guys, I've devised a strategy that is fullproof. Since everyone wanted to lynch moosy before the game began and since not lynching me has a significantly higher percent chance of lynching scum than lynching me, I suggest we lynch moosy until further notice.
##Vote Moosydoosy Band wagoning early? Thats suspicious. Why would you band wagon this early with no reads?
Like.. this is a weird post.
And what i was talking about.
|
On December 28 2015 03:27 N e s s wrote:
i never said you were wrong about your reads on other people.
I understand this can be the case. If you are telling the truth here you should maybe choose your words more carefully in the future. Because i am not even the only person who read your post literally... People here tend to actually read post literally because we expect people to mean what they say and not something else.
If everything can be brushed off with "oh i didn't actually mean this" there is always an out for mafia on anything they ever say. So please. If you say something, be precise.
|
On December 28 2015 03:36 N e s s wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2015 03:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:27 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:23 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit. so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant? Well i see the word sharing so i know what that means. I can tell from context clues it means "sharing reads with another person" but i didn't even know i was sharing reads with you. So, again... Why did you then decide to say i am wrong on everything. In my opinion that means all of my reads are bad, no? But then, after that, you said that you don't know what my reads are (which was already confirmed). How can you say that? It's not like if i am wrong on you all my other reads are shit aswell, is it? What i meant when i said that was you're wrong about me being scum and that your perspective on me saying that exchange between me and GB was wrong in your eyes. Okay. I still can't understand why you asked people on bandwagoning on Moosy (which wasn't exactly bandwagoning since exactly one person voted on him). You know what voting people for either RVS or pressure at the start of the game is, right? Like... the way you approached to the situation -- based on where you come from, doesn't make sense to me. So could you explain these things: 1) Why did you were actually concerned on people RVS'ing/"wagoning" on Moosy at the start of the game, when it is completely normal play regardless of anyone's affiliation on almost any forum that plays mafia? 2) Why did it seem like it was a reason to suspect the guy who voted? Did you really think that guy is a suspect for it? If not, again -- why (1)? 1)I still have no clue as to why everyone voted for moose at the start, am i missing something? Because it doesn't matter alignment or not when voting someone, why would you vote for someone with no reason to at the start? 2) I don't understand what you're asking here, i didn't think anyone who called someone scum in the start would be mafia in a sense, i mean that i don't understand why someone would bother to vote for a person with little or no reason to.
Ugh.... can someone else with better english skills reword the question in case it is unclear because i don't think this answers -- or even tries to -- anything i asked.....
And i don't know if it is my fault or not...
|
On December 28 2015 03:39 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2015 03:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:36 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:27 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:23 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit. so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant? Well i see the word sharing so i know what that means. I can tell from context clues it means "sharing reads with another person" but i didn't even know i was sharing reads with you. So, again... Why did you then decide to say i am wrong on everything. In my opinion that means all of my reads are bad, no? But then, after that, you said that you don't know what my reads are (which was already confirmed). How can you say that? It's not like if i am wrong on you all my other reads are shit aswell, is it? What i meant when i said that was you're wrong about me being scum and that your perspective on me saying that exchange between me and GB was wrong in your eyes. Okay. I still can't understand why you asked people on bandwagoning on Moosy (which wasn't exactly bandwagoning since exactly one person voted on him). You know what voting people for either RVS or pressure at the start of the game is, right? Like... the way you approached to the situation -- based on where you come from, doesn't make sense to me. So could you explain these things: 1) Why did you were actually concerned on people RVS'ing/"wagoning" on Moosy at the start of the game, when it is completely normal play regardless of anyone's affiliation on almost any forum that plays mafia? 2) Why did it seem like it was a reason to suspect the guy who voted? Did you really think that guy is a suspect for it? If not, again -- why (1)? 1)I still have no clue as to why everyone voted for moose at the start, am i missing something? Because it doesn't matter alignment or not when voting someone, why would you vote for someone with no reason to at the start? 2) I don't understand what you're asking here, i didn't think anyone who called someone scum in the start would be mafia in a sense, i mean that i don't understand why someone would bother to vote for a person with little or no reason to. Ugh.... can someone else with better english skills reword the question in case it is unclear because i don't think this answers -- or even tries to -- anything i asked..... And i don't know if it is my fault or not... You're using acronyms he doesn't understand I think, just explain what RVS means?
The thing is i went to his forum and looked at games and they random vote there -- or pressure, just like everywhere else. They even call it RVS..... Which is the problem i can't understand why he doesn't understand what RVS stands for...
|
On December 28 2015 03:47 N e s s wrote:
WHY i thought voting moose is idiotic because there was nothing to go off of from it.
Honestly why can't people realize that, come the hell on people! You realize that we were voting for someone with no reason to.
THATS why i was keen on not understanding why people were voting for him. I know that RVS means Random voting stage, but come on. I don't even use RVS that often.
That's not the point. The point is you at least implied Artanis is suspicious of it when you should know it's not actually suspicious at all (considering you know what RVS is and why people do that).
|
Like i could totally understand it if you said:
"In the same way Artanis voted for Moosy i wanted to pressure him to get the game started and i understand that's what he was trying to do -- regardless of his affiliation".
But you didn't...
|
On December 28 2015 04:47 rsoultin wrote:
rayn do you really think ness is scum here? cause if you don't it would probably be better to drop it i think
I would like him to answer something... like anything that is asked from him... in a manner that is suitable for a mafia game.
On a sidenote.. I could lynch every single person that conmplains about the amount of posts in this game without even trying to do a single thing.
|
Because like "lol you're so bad" is not really an answer i am going to accept. Nor is "i don't wanna talk about this"...
|
So hey Ness, are you "frying these bigger fish" you were talking about? If so, where? If not, were those "bigger fish" sicklucker and Vivax?
|
On December 28 2015 04:47 rsoultin wrote:
lol exo you're one person in a 26-player game going against un-cc'd masons in a known setup
Can i also say that if you think Exo is town you should probably obey his wish so we can be 100% sure you are either mason or mafia?
|
I know but again, if you think Exo is town why would you not do that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
