EPTExcept the jimmies of those who are voting him, cause they are rustled anyway, ergo he scumreads me, GB, sno_man. Everyone else basically stays null/town or he talks about em on request (like FF)
Haunted Mansion Mini Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
Except the jimmies of those who are voting him, cause they are rustled anyway, ergo he scumreads me, GB, sno_man. Everyone else basically stays null/town or he talks about em on request (like FF) | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
On November 27 2015 03:05 Tictock wrote: Dude, what game are you reading? What part of this game does the bolded apply to? I'm saying you talk about a lot of hogwash that doesn't lead anywhere to finding a good lynch, it's just there to talk. Stuff along the lines of "onegu policy lynch? bitch please" as if that was in any way relevant to the game, it's just relevant for you cause you needed to get some opinions out quickly. Meanwhile I only give a fuck about lynching you and Chrom and marv and everyone else so far felt ok to me. Just scott is 100% null cause I didn't even read his posts. I also don't care how much you post after your horrible post on FF contrary to people who think effort=town, I only care that when you did you picked all your reads based on people scumreading you/not caring about you/townreading you in order to get on the good side of the latter two and to scumread people who are already scumreading you anyway. | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + SL incoming | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
On November 27 2015 03:21 Tictock wrote: This is just a pile of confirmation bias about me. Your not bothering to try and suggest why my scumreads are bad, or why the reasons I have given for my townreads aren't valid. You haven't really explained any of your reads besides the one on me, which apparently makes me confirmed mafia. Like how am I supposed to believe you are town here Vivax? I don't have to do any of that as long as I find better reasons to scumread you outside of what you ask me to look at. What you say is utterly stupid and actually something mafia would do. I don't need to find why you're mafia in everything you post, I need to find why you're mafia in some of what you post, and in what you do not post. Do you really expect me to go through every one of your reads and start questioning it just based on my belief that you're mafia? I look at the sum of it: You scumread group x who is scumreading you and townread everyone who can be of help to you staying alive. Your FF response to SL was fake as fuck. I don't need more to scumread you, I don't need to pick apart every other read of yours to prove you're scum. That's totally enough for me. | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
On November 27 2015 03:27 GlowingBear wrote: Yes. And I can relate to Vivax when he says Tictock came back over-contributive Seems you understood the firecracker metaphor, smart guy | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
On November 27 2015 03:28 Koshi wrote: Vivax Can you explain to me why Chrom is mafia? It is like the one I don't really think is mafia. All the others I cba about atm if I have to be really honest here. See, this is precisely why I cba to mention everyone I'm scumreading besides my strongest scumread, it leads to shitty questions like these and is the reason I should just shut up about my thoughts. I want to lynch TT today and I cba to answer anything about marv or Chrom. No,I won't answer, gtfo. | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
I want to lynch TT, I'll talk about TT. | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
On November 27 2015 03:36 Koshi wrote: I just want to see if you have anything smart to say or just gave an extra name and are basically bullshitting. When you answer like this... I am going for bullshitting. Why Chrom? Cause I just played with him when he was town in the game BH won and he feels different. Fake contributive, opportunistic. I scumread him and marv when marv asked him something and he answered it or the other way around, I don't remember exactly. But it's more a tonish/feelish read, not really anything I can justify with specific content, except for one thing: He has been maneuvering around TT while agreeing on him with me and GB, at least around the time we posted against TT. Precisely how I'd see him bussing TT. Do you see any intention of him wanting to lynch TT while saying he agreed with the arguments???? Marv was also really silent around the time the TT thing got started. Now what really matters for me is: Do you think TT had any reason to agree with SL on FF if you look back to it except to not piss him off? I don't. It's obvious he only agreed with him for the sake of agreeing (who doesn't like people who agree with you?), since afterwards FF didn't mean jack to him except when marv asked him about it. | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
| ||
| ||
